European Salon de News, Discussion et Klatsch - 16 March

by Fran
Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 05:08:30 PM EST

 A Daily Review Of International Online Media 


Europeans on this date in history:

1940 – Birth of Bernardo Bertolucci, an Italian film director and screenwriter, whose well known films include: The Conformist, Last Tango in Paris, The Last Emperor and The Dreamers.

More here and video

 The European Salon is a daily selection of news items to which you are invited to contribute. Post links to news stories that interest you, or just your comments. Come in and join us!


The Salon has different rooms or sections for your enjoyment. If you would like to join the discussion, then to add a link or comment to a topic or section, please click on "Reply to this" in one of the following sections:

  • EUROPE - is the place for anything to do with Europe.
  • ECONOMY & FINANCE - is where you find what is going on in finance and the economy.
  • WORLD - here you can add links and comments on topics concerning world affairs.
  • LIVING OFF THE PLANET - is about the environment, energy, agriculture, food...
  • LIVING ON THE PLANET - is about humanity, society, culture, history, information...
  • PEOPLE AND KLATSCH - this is the place for stories about people and off course also for gossipy items. But it's also there for open discussion at any time.
  • I hope you will find this place inspiring - of course meaning the inspiration gained here to show up in interesting diaries on ET. :-)

    There is just one favor I would like to ask you - please do NOT click on "Post a Comment", as this will put the link or your comment out of context at the bottom of the page.

    Actually, there is another favor I would like to ask you - please, enjoy yourself and have fun at this place!

Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 03:17:37 PM EST
EurActiv: Three commissioners to act as Ashton's deputies
Catherine Ashton, the EU's recently-appointed foreign policy chief, will be able to trim her busy work schedule and counter criticism of her lack of visibility thanks to the assistance of three EU commissioners, who will act as her deputies.

Štefan Füle, the Czech commissioner for enlargement, Andris Piebalgs, his Latvian colleague responsible for development, and Kristalina Georgieva, the Bulgarian commissioner for humanitarian aid, will all assist Ashton, a Commission official said.

Catherine Ashton has endured attacks from several quarters, including French ministers, for not flying the EU flag at hotspots such as earthquake-hit Haiti or being unable to attend European gatherings.

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 03:35:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]
most of the criticism of Ashton I've seen seems to have been coming from the UK press...

Wind power
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 05:22:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Ashton is strongly supported by Finland.

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 06:39:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]
BBC: Georgia mafia suspects arrested in six countries

Sixty-nine suspected Georgian mafia members have been arrested in a co-ordinated operation across Europe.

Twenty-four of them were detained in Spain, mainly in Barcelona and Valencia, as part of Operation Java, Spanish police said.

The arrests are the result of a year-long investigation initiated by Spanish police.

The other arrests took place in Austria, Germany, Switzerland, France and Italy.

by Sassafras on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 04:32:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Deutsche Welle: Top EU diplomat slams Israeli settlements on first trip to Middle East

Catherine Ashton, the European Union's new high representative for foreign affairs and security policy, has kicked off her first official trip to the Middle East with tough talk for Israel.

Addressing members of the Arab League in Cairo on Monday, Ashton voiced her disapproval of Israel's decision last week to approve the construction of 1,600 new homes in West Bank settlements, just two days after Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas had reluctantly agreed to begin indirect peace talks. Those talks have since been put on the backburner.

EU foreign policy chief Catherine AshtonBildunterschrift: Großansicht des Bildes mit der Bildunterschrift:  Ashton's speech in Cairo was seen a major test for the EU's new foreign policy chief

She said the move "endangered and undermined the tentative agreement to begin proximity talks."

by Sassafras on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 04:49:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
good for her. won't make any difference tho' cos it's the US that signs the cheques.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 05:27:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The EU provides no aid to Israel.
by asdf on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 12:54:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It does provide mostly free access to Israeli goods on the EU markets...

Wind power
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 05:22:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Independent: Dutch political party PVND formed by paedophiles disbanded

A Dutch political party formed by self-described pedophiles has voted to disband itself after failing for the second time to participate in national elections in June.

The group, which sought to lower the age of sexual consent to 12, says it could not get the 600 signatures necessary to win a place on the ballot in a country of 16.5 million. It would need 60,000 votes to win a seat in the 150-member Dutch parliament.

by Sassafras on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 04:53:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]
France24.com: Socialists triumph while National Front makes headway

Amid record voter apathy, France's Socialist Party have triumphed over the ruling right-wing UMP party in regional elections. The far-right National Front made significant headway while the centrist MoDem party suffered a spectacular defeat.
by Sassafras on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 04:59:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Telegraph: Nicolas Sarkozy identity debate 'boosted votes for far-Right'

Opponents said the president's decision to start a high-profile discussion about issues including immigration, the burka and social cohesion led voters to back Jean-Marie Le Pen's National Front (FN).

The near-bankrupt FN had been written off after a disastrous showing in the 2007 presidential elections, but on Sunday scored almost 12 per cent in the first round of regional elections.

by Sassafras on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 05:01:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Deutsche Welle: Putin's United Russia Party punished at the ballot box

Prime Minister Vladimir Putin's United Russia Party won in the eight regions that held elections in Russia on Sunday with between 43 and 70 percent of the votes cast. But it saw support fall by between nine and 24 percentage points in six regional parliaments compared to national election results in 2007, when it scored a landslide victory.

Opposition parties said the elections were marred by widespread voting violations and complained that President Dmitry Medvedev had failed to follow through on a pledge for free and fair elections.

by Sassafras on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 05:10:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It's all a matter of perspective...  lol.

NYT: Kremlin Sweeps Regional Elections

MOSCOW -- The pro-Kremlin party, United Russia, has again dominated regional elections, according to preliminary results released Monday, though opposition parties have made slight gains in a vote that has been seen as a test of President Dmitri A. Medvedev's call for greater political plurality in Russia.

Voters chose new legislatures in eight regions on Sunday, and regional and municipal elections were held in 76 of Russia's 83 regions.

United Russia, which is headed by the country's preeminent leader, Prime Minister Vladimir V. Putin, chalked up landslide victories in all eight legislative elections and won four of five mayoral races. The party held large victory rallies throughout the country on Monday, including one in Moscow attended by 15,000 people, the party said.

The Commies did rather well, and continue to be the most viable opposition party.  When the Western papers clamor for more democratic polls in Russia, to allow opposition parties more power, is it the Communist Party they envision as harbingers of a vibrant democracy, I wonder?  


"Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.

by poemless on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 05:36:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Why not?  It'd allow the western press to carry on with its fearmongering to a greater degree.

Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
by Drew J Jones (myfriends@thisispancakes.com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 07:50:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]
the Communists are seen as a helful thing by the Kremlin, because they give the impression of a legitimate opposition when it's well known that communists will never get back to power and can be co-opted when necessary.

In other words, it's a totally harmless and useless opposition party, even if it's the only one to actually be organised and to fight for a few thing on behalf of its (aging) voters...

Wind power

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 05:24:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Actually 1) they have become more vocal in their opposition lately and 2) regarding the "impression of a legitimate opposition" and "can be co-opted when necessary", this applies equally if not more to parties like Just Russia, which were actually invented by the Kremlin to give an appearance of competition (and I would argue that if Medvedev starts his own party the same should be said of that) or LDPR which votes with UR but siphons off the extremist crazies during elections giving UR an air of sanity in the midst of madness.  

The Communist Party is at least a genuine party seeking to provide a center left alternative to the center right UR.  They are a hell of a lot more of a "legitimate" opposition than the disorganized micro-parties which have little to no popular support but are most vocal in their opposition to the Kremlin.  

"Pretending that you already know the answer when you don't is not actually very helpful." ~Migeru.

by poemless on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 10:43:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Asda meat supplier excludes English speakers from factory work

Cooked meat manufacturer Forza AW, a major supplier of the Asda supermarket chain, has turned down British workers for factory jobs because they don't speak Polish, it's claimed.

The government's equality watchdog says it plans to contact the firm regarding allegations of discrimination against British jobseekers.

An emailed advert for factory work on Forza's East Anglia production line, sent out via employment agency OSR Recruitment this month, reads: ''Immediate factory work available!!!!

"If you are available or have any friends available, work is starting tomorrow for induction training.

''Transport provided. Applicants must speak Polish. Please call asap!!!!!!''

by das monde on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 06:41:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 03:18:45 PM EST
EurActiv: Offshore hedge funds put EU regulation in doubt
The Spanish EU Presidency is aiming to close an agreement on the draft hedge and private equity funds directive at a meeting of finance ministers in Brussels tomorrow (16 March), with teething problems on foreign fund treatment threatening to derail a deal.

The UK is pushing for EU-wide recognition of hedge funds that have won approval on its territory.

But such an agreement appears unattainable at the moment as Britain and France continue to hold opposing views on the proposed Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD).

[...]

The UK is alone in making such demands and will be overruled by other member states if necessary, the diplomat indicated.

"All members [of the EU's Council of Ministers] are against. The United Kingdom is isolated on this issue. When you are alone, at one point or another you have to recognise it."

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 03:38:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Just overrule the UK and be done with it. Sadly we are like the republicans, we are not negotiating in good fiath.

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 05:29:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]
European Voice: Greece  told to ensure 'solid austerity plan'

Greece told to ensure 'solid austerity plan'
By Contant Brand
15.03.2010 / 18:24 CET
Dutch finance minister says there will be intervention, but no bail-out of Greece.

The Netherlands today warned Greece at a meeting of eurozone finance ministers not to expect "a free ride to cheap loans" as part of any EU co-ordinated measures to help it out of its financial woes.

Dutch Finance Minister Jan Kees de Jager said that Greece had "to ensure a solid austerity plan" before any other aid is offered by the other members of the eurozone.

"It's possible we will take measures in a co-ordinated way...but there will be no bail-out, because a bail-out is also forbidden in the [EU's] treaty," de Jager said.


Voor een demissionair kabinet praten ze wel veel.
by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 04:19:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Reuters: EU to recommend more UK cuts
The European Commission will tell Britain to do more to cut its ballooning budget deficit in the medium term, saying the country's fiscal programme lacks ambition, a draft from the EU executive showed on Monday.

The draft, obtained by Reuters two days before publication, said the programme failed to guarantee Britain would meet a European Union deadline of 2014-15 for cutting the deficit to below the bloc's cap of 3 percent of economic output.

"The overall conclusion is that the fiscal strategy in the convergence programme is not sufficiently ambitious and needs to be significantly reinforced," said the draft, expected to be approved by the Commission on Wednesday.

"A credible timeframe for restoring public finances to a sustainable position requires additional fiscal tightening measures beyond those currently planned," it said.

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 04:47:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]
BBC News - Budget 2010: EU calls for faster UK deficit cuts

The government's plans for reducing the budget deficit are not ambitious enough - according to a European Commission report to be published later this week.

The report warns that the UK is not on course to cut its deficit in line with EU rules by a deadline of 2015.

Those rules say deficits must be below 3% of GDP, but the UK's is expected to hit £178bn - 12.6% of GDP - this year.

Ministers insist their plans to halve the deficit in four years are less likely to halt the economic recovery.

Those plans, announced in the pre-Budget report, would see the UK's deficit reduced to 4.7% by 2015 - missing the EU target outlined by finance ministers last year.



If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 09:08:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]
How will the Eurosceptics in the Tory party handle this? Europe interfering in the UK's internal affairs.

If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
by ceebs (ceebs (at) eurotrib (dot) com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 09:09:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The Brussels-Hoover Consensus strikes again.

Europe is Doomed and I'm not a scaremongering right-winger. We're doomed because we're incapable of thinking past right-wing frames - our institutions are rotten to the core with neo-liberalism.

by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 07:22:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
[Metatone's Crystal Ball of Doom™ Technology]

Sad but true.

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 07:23:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Metatone:
our institutions are rotten to the core with neo-liberalism.

i just heard trichet mouthing opaque platitudes on euro news. the operative, repetitive phrase 'structural reforms' was chanted as my gut clenched in rhythm.

not that structures don't need reforming, but...

"Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do." Jim Hightower

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 11:51:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I believe the IMF exists to give out rides on cheap loans, in exchange for austerity measures.

So what is the Dutch FM proposing again? And why should Greece take it?

by Upstate NY on Wed Mar 17th, 2010 at 12:31:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Timmy-Gate: Did Geithner Help Hide Lehman's Fraud?   By L. Randall Wray

Timmy-Gate Takes a Turn For The Worse: Did Geithner Help Lehman Hide Accounting Tricks?

Just when you thought that nothing could stink more than Timothy Geithner's handling of the AIG bailout, a new report details how Geithner's New York Fed allowed Lehman Brothers to use an accounting gimmick to hide debt. The report, which runs to 2200 pages, was released by Anton Valukas, the court-appointed examiner. It actually makes the AIG bailout look tame by comparison. It is now crystal clear why Geithner's Treasury as well as Bernanke's Fed refuse to allow any light to shine on the massive cover-up underway.

Recall that the New York Fed arranged for AIG to pay one hundred cents on the dollar on bad debts to its counterparties--benefiting Goldman Sachs and a handful of other favored Wall Street firms. (see here) The purported reason is that Geithner so feared any negative repercussions resulting from debt write-downs that he wanted Uncle Sam to make sure that Wall Street banks could not lose on bad bets. Now we find that Geithner's NYFed supported Lehman's efforts to conceal the extent of its problems. (see here) Not only did the NYFed fail to blow the whistle on flagrant accounting tricks, it also helped to hide Lehman's illiquid assets on the Fed's balance sheet to make its position look better. Note that the NY Fed had increased its supervision to the point that it was going over Lehman's books daily; further, it continued to take trash off the books of Lehman right up to the bitter end, helping to perpetuate the fraud that was designed to maintain the pretense that Lehman was not massively insolvent.

Wray cites a NYT article on the subject of the Fed's involvement in hiding the insolvency:

They were considered the dregs of Lehman Brothers -- "bottom of the barrel," as one banker put it. But as Lehman executives tried to keep the floundering bank afloat in 2008, they used these troubled investments to raise quick cash that helped mask the extent of the firm's troubles. And they did it with the help of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

The newly released report on the collapse of Lehman Brothers -- which lays out what it characterizes as "materially misleading" accounting at the bank -- also sheds surprising new light on Lehman's dealings with the New York Fed.

Lehman engaged in a series of transactions with the New York Fed that were similar to the ones that drew criticism from the bankruptcy court examiner who investigated its collapse. The examiner, Anton R. Valukas, drew no conclusions about the transactions with the Fed, and focused instead on deals that were known inside Lehman as "Repo 105."

But the report by Mr. Valukas nonetheless raises fresh questions about the role of the New York Fed in supporting Lehman during the frantic months leading up to its collapse. It suggests that Lehman executives believed the Fed would be able to help the bank avert disaster and provide it with a business opportunity.


So, we have "the dregs of Lehman Brothers" traded to the Fed for "high powered money" at face value. Sort of defines "cash for trash".  But back to Wray:


Geithner told Congress that he has never been a regulator. (see here) That is a quite honest assessment of his job performance, although it is completely inaccurate as a description of his duties as President of the NYFed. Apparently, Geithner has never met an accounting gimmick that he does not like, if it appears to improve the reported finances of a Wall Street firm. We will leave to the side his own checkered past as a taxpayer, although one might question the wisdom of appointing someone who is apparently insufficiently skilled to file accurate tax returns to a position as our nation's chief tax collector. What is far more troubling is that he now heads the Treaury--which means that he is not only responsible for managing two regulatory units (the FDIC and OCC), but also that he has got hold of the government's purse strings. How many more billions or trillions will he commit to a futile effort to help Wall Street avoid its losses?

Geithner has denied that he played any direct role in the AIG bail-out--a somewhat implausible claim given that he was the President of the NYFed and given that this was a monumental and unprecedented action to funnel government funds to AIG's counterparties. He may try to deny involvement in the Lehman deals. (Again, this is implausible. Lehman executives claimed they "gave full and complete financial information to government agencies", and that the government never raised significant objections or directed that Lehman take any corrective action. In fairness, the SEC also overlooked any problems at Lehman. (see here) But here is what is so astounding about the gimmicks: Lehman used "Repo 105" to temporarily move liabilities off its balance sheet--essentially pretending to sell them although it promised to immediately buy them back. The abuse was so flagrant that no US law firm would sign off on the practice, fearing that creditors and stockholders would have grounds for lawsuits on the basis that this caused a "material misrepresentation" of Lehman's financial statements. (see here) The court-appointed examiner hired to look into the failure of Lehman found "materially misleading" accounting and "actionable balance sheet manipulation." (here) But just as Arthur Andersen had signed off on Enron's scams, Ernst & Young found no problem with Lehman. (here)

In short, this was an Enron-style, go directly to jail and do not pass go, sort of fraud. Lehman's had been using this trick since 2001. (here) It looked fine to Timmy's Fed, which extended loans allowing Lehman to flip bad assets onto the Fed's balance sheet to keep the fraud going.

More generally, this revelation drives home three related points. First, the scandal is on-going and it is huge. President Obama must hold Geithner accountable. He must determine what did Geithner know, and when did he know it. All internal documents and emails related to the AIG bailout and the attempt to keep Lehman afloat need to be released. Further, Obama must ask what has Geithner done to favor his clients on Wall Street? It now looks like even the Fed BOG, not just the NYFed, is involved in the cover-up. It is in the interest of the Obama administration to come clean. It is hard to believe that it does not already have sufficient cause to fire Geithner. In terms of dollar costs to the government, this is surely the biggest scandal in US history. It terms of sheer sleaze does it rank with Watergate? I suppose that depends on whether you believe that political hit lists and spying that had no real impact on the outcome of an election is as bad as a wholesale handing-over of government and the economy to Wall Street.

At least Senator Kaufman, who took Joe Biden's seat, has spoken out on this outrage. But the Republicans are hoping to win back Wall Street's favor, so they are keeping quiet about this massive ongoing fraud, and, of course, the Obama White House, who received the most money ever for a presidential campaign from Wall Street, is demonstrating to Wall Street just what their largess has purchased. From HuPo, who picked up Simon Johnson's article in Baseline Scenario:

Last week, Senator Ted Kaufman (D., DE) gave a devastating speech in the Senate on "too big to fail" and all it entails. A long public silence from our political class was broken -- and to great effect. Today's Dodd reform proposals stand in pale comparison to the principles outlined by Senator Kaufman. And yes, DE stands for Delaware -- corporate America has finally decided that its largest financial offspring are way out of line and must be reined in.

Now, the Senator has gone one better, putting many private criticisms of the financial sector -- the kind you hear whispered with conviction on the Upper East Side and in Midtown -- firmly and articulately on the public record in a Senate floor speech to be delivered tomorrow (this is a direct link to speech). He pulls no punches:
   

"fraud and potential criminal conduct were at the heart of the financial crisis"

He goes after Lehman -- with its infamous Repo 105 -- as well as the other entities potentially implicated in those transactions, including Ernst and Young (Lehman's auditors). This is the low hanging fruit -- but have you heard even a squeak from the White House or anyone else in the country's putative leadership on this issue?

And then he goes for the twin jugulars of Wall Street as it still stands: The idea that we saved something, at great expense in 2008-09, that was actually worth saving; and Goldman Sachs.
   

"[T]his is not about retribution. This is about addressing the continuum of behavior that took place -- some of it fraudulent and illegal -- and in the process addressing what Wall Street and the legal and regulatory system underlying its behavior have become."

I certainly hope that Sen. Kaufman, D. Del. does, as Simon suggests, have the tacit approval of the preponderance of the many corporations incorporated in Delaware. Wall Street's activities have long since ceased to benefit any but themselves. Divide and conquer could spell the end of the cover-up, of Wall Street and the existing system of financialization. I dream. But their goal would be to save corporatism by sacrificing some of Wall Street.

(Everywhere a "(here)" appears in Wray's text there is a link that I did not incorporate. It is way past my bedtime.)

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."

by ARGeezer (ARGeezer at eurotrib.com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 01:52:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Lehman was using repo 105s to temporarily convert securities into cash at the time of quarterly book closings, to make its accounts look better (less leveraged, mainly).

At some point it ran out of securities that its (commercial) counterparties would accept as collateral for these very short term cash loans. And that's where apparently the Fed took over, by taking in junk in exchange for fresh cash.

Amazing.

Wind power

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 05:30:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Amazing
Geithner told Congress that he has never been a regulator. (see here) That is a quite honest assessment of his job performance, although it is completely inaccurate as a description of his duties as President of the NYFed. Apparently, Geithner has never met an accounting gimmick that he does not like, if it appears to improve the reported finances of a Wall Street firm.
I think Congress should drop on Geithner like a ton of bricks.

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 06:05:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The level of awesome™ here is frying my Geiger counter
Lehman's had been using this trick since 2001
In other words, when the .com bubble burst it should have taken Lehman Brothers with it. It didn't. Instead, Lehman was allowed to cook the books until well after the next bubble burst.

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 06:10:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Who thinks Lehman is the only 'investment' bank capable of systematic dishonesty?

Lying is what very serious people do for a living. The head nodding, think tank funding and suit wearing are just protective colouration.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 09:36:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Is this in the same league?

BBC: ECB lends $500bn€350bn to lower rates (18 December 2007)

All banks with enough collateral, and which submitted bids of at least 4.21%, received funds from the ECB.

The ECB said 390 banks across the eurozone had sought the funding.

The move - making the extra cash available over the next two weeks -will ease fears of a credit meltdown over the Christmas period, when banks need extra cash.

I'm not sure any more what's legitimate and what's accounting fraud (borderline or outright).

I mean, how is ease fears of a credit meltdown over the Christmas period, when banks need extra cash [to close their year-end books] different from Jérôme's temporarily convert securities into cash at the time of quarterly book closings, to make its accounts look better?

Lehman was using repo 105s to temporarily convert securities into cash at the time of quarterly book closings, to make its accounts look better (less leveraged, mainly).

At some point it ran out of securities that its (commercial) counterparties would accept as collateral for these very short term cash loans. And that's where apparently the Fed took over, by taking in junk in exchange for fresh cash.

What's so
Amazing
here?

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 10:13:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The ECB action looks like a panic one-off loan - effectively a short-term overdraft for the banks to cover cash flow requirements.

The Lehman innovation was systematic misreporting of its solvency, repeated quarterly to give a misleading impression to markets - aided by the Fed, which presumably was doing similar deals elsewhere on Wall St.

It's the difference between a one-off loan with full disclosure, and a quick bung between friends, which is never reported or disclosed.

In the UK it's illegal for a company to trade while insolvent. Lehman was insolvent in real terms, and was hiding that fact behind a facade of misreporting, creative accounting and generous undisclosed cash handouts from Timmy.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 10:36:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In the UK it's illegal for a company to trade while insolvent.

So it is in Spain. However, a Decree was enacted on December 12 2008 providing that losses on real state investments or inventory are not computed for the purposes of technical insolvency. Just in time to close the books for the year, I might point out.

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 10:58:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The ECB has explicit standards for collateral. The Fed seems to have taken complete (unrated) junk from Lehman.

Wind power
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 02:06:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I guess the Fed had swallowed the ideological position that a central bank need only carry out only open market operations and set the base interest rate hook, line and sinker; to the point that they had forgotten how to operate the discount window.

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 04:12:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]
At some point (Lehman) ran out of securities that its (commercial) counterparties would accept as collateral...

That point might have been five years ago! IIRCC, Repo 105 only accounted for around $50 billion of the >$300 billion hole that suddenly appeared on Lehman's books. It may be that "cash for trash" "Special Investment Vehicles, (SIVs), courtesy of the Fed, accounted for the rest.

Gotta love the multiple meanings of "accounted." And who says the financialization industry doesn't have a brutal sense of humor. A long term repo written around trash and held by a subsidiary or the friendly Fed is a SIV!

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."

by ARGeezer (ARGeezer at eurotrib.com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 01:19:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
At some point it ran out of securities that its (commercial) counterparties would accept as collateral for these very short term cash loans. And that's where apparently the Fed took over, by taking in junk in exchange for fresh cash.
It appears that's not correct, and may be an exaggeration by the New York Times when they say
They were considered the dregs of Lehman Brothers -- "bottom of the barrel," as one banker put it. But as Lehman executives tried to keep the floundering bank afloat in 2008, they used these troubled investments to raise quick cash that helped mask the extent of the firm's troubles. And they did it with the help of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
If Lehman brothers an out of willing counterparties it was not because of the quality of the assets, but because its own creditworthiness was deteriorating, and because of the high value of liquidity. Specifically, according to FT Alphaville's What's in Repo 105
But what exactly was Lehman Bros stuffing into the Repo 105 sausage?

Perhaps counter-intuitively it was not using the stuff on its balance sheet that was hardest to sell into markets.

Rather, it was the most liquid -- things like A- to AAA-rated securities, Treasuries and Agency debt, which you can see in the below table, from the Examiner's Report (Appendix 17)

What this means is that Lehman was using Repo 105 exclusively to reduce its leverage (by shrinking its balance sheet) rather than to get liquidity. It needed to put good quality collateral into the Repo 105 in order to find willing counterparties. Of course, as the crisis worsened it had to turn to the Fed, but the collateral seems to have been good (or, at least, blessed with a good rating by the agencies) except for a 5-10 percent of the total value of the Repo 105. Tyler Durden of Zero Hedge writes in The "Repo 105" Scam: How Lehman Fooled Everyone (Including Allegedly Dick Fuld) And How Other Banks Are Likely Doing This Right Now
In August 2008, just before it was over, the firm allowed $55 million, or seven securities, rated CCC to be included in a Repo 105 transaction.
$55 million is just 0.1% of the $50bn that Lehman shifted off of its balance sheet in the second quarter of 2008 alone (link to HuffPo). Tyler Durden proceeds:
The next chart makes it evident it that 105s were used simply to game the firm's assets into quarter end (yellow highlights), by reducing overall asset for leverage ratio calculations.

That this scam was going unsupervised (just who the hell were the counterparties?) for many years, and that many banks are likely using it right now to fool investors, regulators, rating agencies, and the idiots at the FRBNY (who certainly also know about this), is beyond criminal. Yet that nobody will go to jail for this is as certain as the market going up another 10% tomorrow. A full investigation has to be conducted immediately into whether existing Wall Street firms, and in particular those who use Ernst & Young as auditors, are currently abusing public confidence via such transactions.

The "scam" is not that they were getting cash for junk, but that they were reporting repos as sales, not as financial transactions.

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 04:45:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]
President Obama must hold Geithner accountable. He must determine what did Geithner know, and when did he know it.
Remind me again what the stated justification was for Obama to appoint Geithner Treasury Secretary? Can we say fox in the henhouse?

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 06:16:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Can we say Fox Industrial Chicken Harvesting Inc?

It's becoming less and less clear who exactly appointed whom. See also:

Senator Kaufman Makes A Stand Against The Criminality Exposed By The Lehman Examiner Report, Questions The Core Principles Of US Democracy | zero hedge

One person, however, who refuses to let it go, is Senator Ted Kaufman, whose determined support for an overhaul of market structure we have followed over the past year. The Senator now moves on to yet another pressing issue: the disclosures of unprecedented impropriety conducted by virtually every person of responsibility within the Lehman organization, as well as associated firms like Ernst & Young, and regulators who were asleep at the wheel during the moment of greatest stress for the American financial system. Kaufman calls for a "a thorough investigation, both civil and criminal, to identify every last person who had knowledge that Lehman was misleading the public about its troubled balance sheet - and that means everyone from the Lehman executives, to its board of directors, to its accounting firm, Ernst & Young. Moreover, if the foreign bank counterparties who purchased the now infamous "Repo 105s" were complicit in the scheme, they should be held accountable as well."

So what happens now?

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 09:46:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Kaufman calls for a "a thorough investigation, both civil and criminal, to identify every last person who had knowledge that Lehman was misleading the public about its troubled balance sheet - and that means everyone from the Lehman executives, to its board of directors, to its accounting firm, Ernst & Young. Moreover, if the foreign bank counterparties who purchased the now infamous "Repo 105s" were complicit in the scheme, they should be held accountable as well."

Funny the (New York) Fed is not mentioned...

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 09:49:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I noticed that too.

I wonder how the audit bill is doing.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 10:03:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Noting how the Catholic church seems to pass off the repeated manifestations of priestly kiddy-fiddling as "a couple of bad apples, nothing institutional whatsoever, move along", I'm sure that we'll find that there were no systemic problems whatsoever, but it was just " a couple of bad apples".

Over and over again.

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 11:00:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Deal Book (NY Times blog): In Lehman's Demise, Some Shades of Enron (12 March, 2010)
The examiner's report gives us a new term for hiding problems on a corporate balance sheet that may become common parlance: "Repo 105." Starting in 2001, Lehman Brothers engaged in repurchase agreements, called "repos," which were described by DealBook as "what amounts to a short-term loan, exchanging collateral for cash up front, and then unwinding the trade as soon as overnight." Repos are  a common method for investment banks to finance their operations and are neither illegal nor questionable, at least when clearly accounted for.

Lehman Brothers went a step further by having the collateral exchange under the agreement worth 105 percent of the cash it received -- hence, the "105" in the firm's nomenclature. By doing so, that turned it into a sale for accounting purposes, so that the firm could move the assets it exchanged in the deal off of its balance sheet, at least for a short while.

As explained by DealBook, "That meant that for a few days -- and by the fourth quarter of 2007 that meant end-of-quarter -- Lehman could shuffle off tens of billions of dollars in assets to appear more financially healthy than it really was." By timing Repo 105 transactions to the end of a quarter, the reports filed with the S.E.C. and reviewed by investors looked much better than what was going to be the case just a short time later. Enron did much the same thing with some of its assets, such as its notorious Nigerian barge deal.



The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 10:20:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Here's what I don't understand.

A repo is, roughly, a contract where A pays B an amount X in exchange for collateral worth Y and the commitment to repurchase the collateral for Z at a later date.

Are we supposed to understand from the Repo 105 issue that, depending on the relative values of X, Y, and Z, the transaction may or may not be a sale or a derivative or a loan for accounting purposes? Can accounting regulations be this byzantine and at the same time this harebrained?

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 11:13:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Accounting regulations are decided by committees of accountants.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 11:27:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That explains it.

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 01:27:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Oh, worse. Many transnational corporate auditors are conniving thieves.

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 11:27:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
We have an answer from MarketBeat (WSJ blogs)
First off, what's a repo?: Repos, or repurchase agreements, are transactions which banks use to borrow cash short term. The deals involve raising cash to fund operations by lending out high-quality assets (usually Treasury bills) for a short period of time. As part of the deals, the banks agree to repurchase their collateral within days or weeks.

What is the accounting?: In most circumstances, these transactions are accounted for as a loan on the books of the company. Accountants can treat these agreements as sales of assets rather than loans, only if the companies show that the company receiving the loan does not retain control over the securities used as collateral.

How do you know if the company controls the securities or not?: Guidance in the accounting rules suggests that an exchange of securities in excess of 102% of the cash value would show a lack of control. So Lehman exchanged securities worth 105% of the cash it received, which is why they were called Repo 105 deals, according to the Lehman examiner's report. So according to the report, Lehman would get these things off its books, report earnings, showing lower leverage rationsratios, and then buy the assets back.

Let's replay that in slow motion:
Guidance in the accounting rules suggests that an exchange of securities in excess of 102% of the cash value would show a lack of control.
That's is the most stupid accounting regulation ever! There are all kinds of reasons for overcollateralization, and over-the-counter credit transactions (putting on an accountant's hat for a minute let's call them all loans) can include credit spreads above or below market interest rates. So, under US GAAP, if you slap a 200 basis point credit charge on a repo counterparty they get to book a collateralised loan as a sale!? WTF?

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 04:55:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]
In fact, it's a little more complicated than that. I guess the WSJ guy is right that GAAP gives that harebrained guidance about control being lost for collateral in excess of 102% of loan value, but it's likely that's not what Lehman was doing. According to the FT alphaville piece What's in Repo 105 that I linked to here
Lehman's own accounting policy required assets used for Repo 105 "be readily obtainable" -- i.e. liquid -- according to the report. Lehman's lawyers also recommended they be liquid so that "the Buyer could easily dispose of the Purchased Securities and acquire equivalent securities if it wished."
The first time I read that it struck me as odd - in a regular repo, the parties commit to exchanging the exact same security at the beginning and end of the transaction. But Lehman's, in order to make sure that the loss of control GAAP guidance applied, must have written into its repo contracts a clause allowing the counterparty to dispose of the collateral at will, as long as it returned an equivalent security at the end of the repo's life. But in order for this to be a meaningful clause, the security must have been highly liquid. Hence the internal requirement by the lawyers (not the accountants) that the assets be highly liquid.

Clever little buggers, Lehman Brothers...

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 05:35:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Still not clever enough...

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 07:26:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Every ponzi scheme comes to an end.

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 07:47:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Enron did much the same thing with some of its assets, such as its notorious Nigerian barge deal.
I got an email today from an executive in a big American bank telling me he had a barge in Nigeria he needed to move and did I have a couple million for a repo...

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 12:10:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I got an email today from an executive in a big American bank telling me he had a barge in Nigeria he needed to move and did I have a couple million for a repo...

For real?!


As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer at eurotrib.com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 01:03:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I was trying to make a joke about Nigerian scam email spam...

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 01:24:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]
These days, considering your day job, it is hard to know...  :-/

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer at eurotrib.com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 02:35:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]
E-mail him back and ask if he could get GS to write you a CDS around the deal at his expense

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer at eurotrib.com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 01:09:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]
FREMONT, Calif. (AP) -- The United Auto Workers union has reached a tentative agreement to shut down California's sole remaining auto plant which employs 4,600 people....

Nummi, which stands for New United Motor Manufacturing Inc., began 25 years ago as a joint venture between Toyota and General Motors Co. The goal was to let GM observe the Japanese car-making system and let Toyota test out its production model on U.S. workers....

Toyota plans to move production of the Corolla to Canada and Japan and the Tacoma to Texas.

Read more...



Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
by Cat on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 09:05:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]
"If these programs keep growing, you're going to wind up with more and more students who are graduating and can't find meaningful employment," said Rafael I. Pardo, a professor at Seattle University School of Law and an expert on educational finance. "They can't generate income needed to pay back their loans, and they're going to end up in financial distress."...

The administration is also tightening regulations to ensure that vocational schools that receive aid dollars prepare students for "gainful employment." Under a proposal being floated by the Department of Education, programs would be barred from loading students with more debt than justified by the likely salaries of the jobs they would pursue.

"During a recession, with increased demand for education and more anxiety about the ability to get a job, there is a heightened level of hazard," said Robert Shireman, a deputy under secretary of education. "There is a lot of Pell grant money out there, and we need to make sure it's being used effectively." ...

For-profit schools have proved adept at capturing Pell grants, which are a centerpiece of the Obama administration's efforts to make higher education more affordable. The administration increased financing for Pell grants by $17 billion for 2009 and 2010 as part of its $787 billion stimulus package.

Two years ago, students at for-profit trade schools received $3.2 billion in Pell grants, according to the Department of Education, less than went to students at two-year public institutions. By the 2011-12 school year, the administration now estimates, students at for-profit schools should receive more than $10 billion in Pell grants, more than their public counterparts. (Those anticipated increases may shrink, depending on the outcome of wrangling in Congress over health care and student lending.) ...

Jeffrey West was working at a pet store near Philadelphia, earning about $8 an hour, when he saw advertisements for training programs offered by WyoTech, a chain of trade schools owned by Corinthian Colleges Inc., a publicly traded company that last year reported revenue of $1.3 billion. After Mr. West called the school, an admissions representative drove to his house to sell him on classes in auto body refinishing and upholstering technology, a nine-month program that cost about $30,000.

Read more...

Possibly related vitriol:
Feb 2010

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

by Cat on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 09:20:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]
   

Updated and expanded graph. Growth and stability pact is major FAIL.


Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 10:53:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Bigger graph.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 10:55:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]
France, Germany and the BeNeLux have been in violation of the Growth and Stability pact for years. However, they are Northern Europe and so they get to lecture Club Med for years before EU accession and ever since.

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 11:05:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I mean Euro accession.

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 01:27:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]
(l) Slide #6 of WH Health Care Talking Points for the Democratic Party Caucus. The pull quote is presumably derived from the health reform up-or-down-vote campaign speech Mr Obama prepared for delivery yesterday in Strongsville, Ohio. Source. I note with interest this reference to the former investment bank Goldman Sachs. This reference leads me to wonder, what insurable interest the company and its not-middle-class employees hold in health care reform that warrants special mention.

Mr Obama does not mention the company by name. He does however deprecate advocates of insurance deregulation calling "less oversight and fewer rules ...the fox-guarding-the-henhouse approach to health insurance reform." He says deregulation --of current monopolistic insurer practices-- "would segment [sic] the market further." More interesting, he associates "bargaining power" of government or "big company" benefits planners opposed to insurers to the "negotiating power" of an individual member or an insurers' actuarial pool (market "segment") defined by age, location, income, plan design, and pre-existing medical condition-- rather than that purchasing power exemplified by single-payer, federal administration of managed care insurance models Medicaid and Medicare. And he of course continues to gloss guaranteed issue and guaranteed renewal provisions of coverages with premium "affordability" these bills purport to establish.Source

While I can support Mr Obama's intention to reassure employed, insured citizens that legislative opponents misrepresent substantitive health insurance regulation, I still cannot support either his alternative explanation of insurance reform or the inexplicable urgency of passing this bill, this week. I reviewed H.R. 3590 this week and it is evident to me that since 24 Dec., House intransigence and popular agitation have produced some beneficial alterations to the senate language. So-called debate must continue and senators up for re-election forced early and often to reveal their hands to constituents.

Possibly related news:

legitimate "process arguments"
"illigitimate" process arguments, Rules Committee "psy-ops"
reconciliation tactics

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

by Cat on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 01:14:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Know the difference between a market maker and a market taker ("price taker").

article, "Market power".

Individual buyers (policy holders) whether not grouped by community- or experience-ratings (risk) participate in an insurance market as individual price takers. First, Baucus bill Romneycare does not alter the market power of individual buyers; it in fact formalizes inelasticity of demand or zero pricing power viz. insurers. Second, actuarial classification of individual buyers by insurers does not solve or eliminate agency inequities identified as monopolistic practices if individual buyers are prohibited by law from uniting their insurable interests and purchase decisions; it in fact formalizes insurer price discrimination and scheduled rate adjustments, while imposing an annualized debt limit on insureds' cost-sharing obligations for consideration of guaranteed issue and guaranteed renewable policy ownership; and it in fact only empowers medical goods and services producers that are state contractors bargaining license, limit cost plus 175% mark-up. Thank you.


Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

by Cat on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 02:05:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Market power doesn't exist. I thought that was the axiom in elementary economics, right?

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 04:14:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Free market theories are rife with contradictions, chief among these being conditions of perfect information, ceteris paribus, that foreclose monopoly to all participants but the state, which doesn't or shouldn't exist either.

Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
by Cat on Wed Mar 17th, 2010 at 08:31:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 03:20:02 PM EST
EUobserver: China exploring rail routes to Europe
China is exploring the possibility of extending its high-speed train network as far as Europe, potentially cutting rail travel time between London and Beijing to as little as two days.

Officials hope to see the project completed over the next ten years, enabling passengers to travel the roughly 8,000 kilometre journey at speeds of up to 320 kilometres per hour.

Two lines to Europe are reportedly being considered under the proposals, one passing through India, Pakistan, and the Middle East, while a second would head to Germany via Russia. Exact routes are currently undecided however. A third line would extend south from China to connect Vietnam, Thailand, Burma and Malaysia.

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 03:33:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
(Makes squeaky want-a-railpass noises)
by Sassafras on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 05:11:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]
i bet the food will be good!

can you squeak in mandarin?

"Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do." Jim Hightower

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 05:21:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
To be called the Occident Express?
by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 05:21:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]
too close to Accident for my liking

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 05:30:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]
that's visionary, i'm impressed...

"Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do." Jim Hightower
by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 05:21:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Truly epic. It makes the US look like a big island.

We could have a group ET outing to Shanghai from Paris.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 09:48:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You can thank the USA for funding such an impressive project!
by asdf on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 12:55:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
asdf:
You can thank the USA for funding such an impressive project!

heh, all hail the mighty american consumer!

i thought it was the chinese financing the american afghan-iraq madventure.

signed,
confused

"Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do." Jim Hightower

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 11:46:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's quid pro quo

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 12:43:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]
SPIEGEL: Washington Mulls Modernization of Aging Bombs
Germany's foreign minister has called for the removal of Cold War legacy nuclear weapons being stored here, but some in Washington may have other plans. The US Department of Energy is requesting a budget of close to $2 billion to modernize the country's oldest models of nuclear weapons, including those being kept in Germany.

In a move that could have an impact on the future of nuclear weapons stored in Germany and other parts of Europe, the United States Department of Energy has included requests in its latest budget proposal for funding to modernize parts of the country's aging nuclear arsenal -- a move that would seem to contradict the vision of a nuclear weapons-free world President Barack Obama announced last year.

From 2011 to 2015, the agency wants to allocate close to $2 billion to push forward plans to modernize its arsenal of B-61 nuclear bombs. Some of these weapons are being kept in Europe, including some at storage facilities at the German air force base in Büchel. In total, the US Air Force still has around 150 strategic B-61 bombs in its active arsenal as well as around 400 non-strategic models and a reserve of around 200 further non-strategic bombs.

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 03:42:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]
No wonder they are so indulgent of Israel's constant agitation to push the envelope, they can't stop themselves either. what do they want all those weapons for ?

keep to the Fen Causeway
by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 05:32:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The B-61 is our primary aircraft deployed nuclear weapon.  It can be programmed for variable yield, thus it is a "tactical" as well as "strategic" weapon, as well as altitude, sub-surface to air-only burst.  So it has multi-mission capability.

And the 'Bomb's Away!' boys within the USAF would be sucking hind teat, versus the missile carried weapons platforms, if they didn't have 'em.

And aircraft deployed nuclear weapons is the only operationally verified means of delivering the goddamn things.

No one could have predicted

by ATinNM on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 05:46:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]
"aircraft deployed nuclear weapons is the only operationally verified means of delivering the goddamn things"

And that was when there was a SAC. With the modern Fat Force, who would bet that they could find their way to the target?

by asdf on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 12:57:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]
in the 90s criticizing the US educational system.  Showed an AF general and a pimply-faced LT in a bunker with a map of Europe on the screen they were looking at.  The caption read:

"Russia, that's the one shaped like a boot, right?"

"Schiller sprach zu Goethe, Steck in dem Arsch die Flöte! Goethe sagte zu Schiller, Mein Arsch ist kein Triller!"

by Jeffersonian Democrat (rzg6f@virginia.edu) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 10:02:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Closer to home, the Anglo redtop 'The Sun' just did a story about the David Beckham detached tendon and the immediate surgery to be performed by a renowned Finnish sports surgeon in Turku - the old capital of Finland. They even provided a useful map for their readers showing the location of the Sth African World Cup 2010, Milan where the accident happened, and Turku, which was placed in southern Sweden.

Mind you, we have been struggling to put Finland on the map for ages. Only now we're thinking of taking it off again. People who can't find us are not people we really want to know.

A standard tactic against an invading army used to be revolving the signposts at road intersections.

You can't be me, I'm taken

by Sven Triloqvist on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 11:20:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
No need to use it against the British. They are perfectly capable of invading the wrong country by themselves.
by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 11:36:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
a move that would seem to contradict the vision of a nuclear weapons-free world President Barack Obama announced last year.

hahaha, haha, ha. That's even funnier than claims of Obama wanting to improve health care. At least in the case of health care he had some power on the table to play with.

you are the media you consume.

by MillMan (millguy at gmail) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 03:12:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
War is Peace.

The Nobel Peace Prize has gone nuclear.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 09:49:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Al Jazeera: Thailand caught in protest standoff

Tens of thousands of anti-government protesters in Thailand have rallied outside a military base on the outskirts of the capital in an effort to increase pressure on the country's prime minister to stand down and call fresh elections.

The protesters, known as the Reds Shirts, had set a deadline of noon on Monday (0500GMT) for Abhisit Vejjajiva to resign or face what they say will be crippling mass demonstrations in the Thai capital.

That deadline has now passed and Abhisit has rejected their demand for fresh elections.

by Sassafras on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 05:15:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]
BBC: ANC's Julius Malema guilty of South Africa hate speech

A South African judge has convicted ANC official Julius Malema of hate speech for his comments about the woman who accused President Jacob Zuma of rape.

The Equality Court judge ordered Mr Malema to make an unconditional apology and pay 50,000 rand ($6,700; £4,500) to a centre for abused women.

The ANC Youth League leader had said the woman must have had a "nice time". Mr Zuma was acquitted of rape.

by Sassafras on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 05:18:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]
From Ha'aretz.
Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman on Monday boycotted Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva's speech to Israel's Knesset to protest the visiting leader's refusal to lay a wreath at Mount Herzl.

Lieberman also boycotted a meeting between Lula and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, claiming the Brazilian president slighted Israel by refusing the customary diplomatic visit to Mount Herzl and the gravesite of Zionist leader Theodore Herzl.

Maybe it would be simpler to keep a list of those countries Lieberman hasn't insulted yet?
by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 05:27:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Since nobody bothered to explain why Lula skipped the Mt. Herzl visit,  I looked at google.com.br. According to one article, and using my nonexistent knowledge of Portuguese, it looks like Lula simply wasn't aware of the fact that they had just made up a new tradition.
"Não é uma questão de dar sinais políticos ocultos. Está se fazendo uma tempestade em copo d'água, e a decisão não é uma desfeita por parte do presidente", disse a fonte.

A informação que chegou ao governo brasileiro é de que a visita ao túmulo de Herzl não é praxe de viagens oficiais. Os dois últimos chefes de Estado que passaram por Israel - o presidente francês, Nicolas Sarkozy, e o primeiro-ministro italiano, Silvio Berlusconi - não visitaram o local.

by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 06:39:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 03:20:49 PM EST
EUobserver: `We failed' on species extinction, admits EU
European Union environment ministers officially gave up on a decade-old target to stop the depletion of the continent's animal and plant species on Monday.

"We have missed our 2010 biodiversity target, obviously," European environment commissioner Janez Potocnik told reporters in Brussels following his first attendance at an EU environment council. "We must not repeat that mistake."

"This is year we want to establish [new] baseline targets and develop a convincing strategy on how to ensure we won't fail again," he added.

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 03:24:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]
European Voice: Potočnik offers concessions on soil directive to get deal
Janez Potočnik, the European commissioner for the environment, said today that he was prepared to offer concessions to a group of six countries that are blocking a deal on the EU's first-ever law on soil protection.

Speaking at a meeting of EU environment ministers in Brussels, Potočnik said he would make "further efforts to bring member states on board".

Austria, Germany France, Malta, the Netherlands and the UK today re-stated their opposition to a draft directive on soil. The proposal, which would oblige countries to draw up plans to clean up contaminated soil and offset soil lost to urban expansion, has failed to make progress in the Council of Ministers for more than three years.

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 03:26:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]
EUobserver: EU's gas pipe to Caspian Sea faces make or break decision
Countries bordering the Caspian sea need to sign supply contracts this year for Europe's long-planned Nabucco gas pipeline if the project is to go ahead, with a `big push' expected from the European Commission and member states involved, one of the stakeholders told this website.

Eight years into the preparation phase of the EU's most ambitious pipeline project, stakeholders are now increasingly nervous about securing the necessary gas supplies from Caspian littoral countries to make the investment worth while.

"We are basically sitting at the borders of Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan and waiting. We're in discussions, but we need now to pull this together to get the supply commitments," Jeremy Ellis, head of business development at German energy company RWE, one of the Nabucco stakeholders told EUobserver in a phone interview.

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 04:45:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
apparently the plan is to rely on Kurdistan (née Iraq) gas now...

Wind power
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 05:31:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The Archdruid Report
The energy contained in a photon is defined by its frequency, and that remains pretty much the same (barring a bit of gravitational redshifting) from the moment it spins out of the thermonuclear maelstrom of the Sun until the moment eight minutes later when it arrives on earth and gets absorbed by a green leaf, let's say, or the absorbent surface in a solar water heater. Once again, though, that's a matter of the quantity of energy, not the concentration. The concentration, in this case, is determined by the rate at which photons impact the leaf or the solar panel; that depends on how widely spread the photons are, and that depends, in turn, on how far the leaf and the panel are from the Sun.

Think of it this way. The individual photons that heat the planet Mercury each contain, on average, the same quantity of energy as the individual photons that heat the planet Neptune. Is Neptune as warm as Mercury? Not hardly, and the reason is that by the time they get out to the orbit of Neptune, the Sun's rays are spread out over a much vaster area, so each square foot of Neptune gets a lot fewer photons than a corresponding square foot of Mercury. The photons are less concentrated in space, and that, not the quantity of energy they each contain, determines how much of the hard work of heating a planet they are able to do. There are stars in the night sky that produce photons far more energetic, on average, than those released by the Sun, but you're not going to get a star tan from their light!


"Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do." Jim Hightower
by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 05:14:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]
So that's why it's springtime! The Earth is getting closer to the Sun!!!

Oh, no, sorry.

by asdf on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 12:59:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Guardian: Money spent on tar sands projects could decarbonise western economies

The £250bn cost of developing Canada's controversial tar sands between now and 2025 could be used to decarbonise the western economy by funding ambitious solar power schemes in the Sahara or a European wide shift to electric vehicles, according to a new report released today.

The same amount of investment would also help the world to hit half of the Millenium Development Goals in the 50 least-developed countries, says the research from The Co-operative and conservation group, WWF, which is released to coincide with a new film, Dirty Oil, being premiered in 25 cinemas around the UK today.

by Sassafras on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 05:51:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Blaha-blaha.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 11:01:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]
by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 03:21:10 PM EST
European Voice: EU  institutions launch new recruitment procedures
The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) will launch a new selection procedure for recruiting EU officials tomorrow (16 March). The new system aims to speed up the process of recruiting officials to under a year and move to a more predictable procedure that allows job-seekers to plan their applications and the institutions to fill their recruitment needs more efficiently.

Maroš Šefčovič, the European commissioner responsible for personnel and administration, said: "In an increasingly competitive jobs market, the European institutions have to be able to attract a diverse range of top quality applicants." He added that the institutions would only be able to convince good candidates to join if they have "the prospect of finding an attractive post without undue delay". In the past candidates have been deterred by having to wait up to two years between applying and being put on the reserve list, the final stage before getting a job in the institutions.


... and here I was banking on it being 2 years
by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 03:29:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]
SPIEGEL: Pope Remains Silent as Abuse Allegations Hit Close to Home
Allegations of sexual abuse in the German Catholic Church continue to surface. Questions have been raised about what Pope Benedict XVI may have known about specific incidents of abuse and his brother, Georg Ratzinger, is also under fire. The pope, however, has so far remained silent.

Georg Ratzinger came clean about his transgressions. Indeed, it seemed to be the end of the matter -- one which placed him squarely in the center of Germany's ever expanding Church abuse scandal.

"In the beginning, I slapped (the boys) in the face on a number of occasions," said Ratzinger, who, for decades, was the director of the Regensburger Domspatzen, one of the most renowned boys' choirs in Germany. But he stopped the practice back in 1980, he says, because the state had banned corporal punishment. He says that he "strictly" observed the new law.

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 03:39:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]
NY Times: German Priest Suspended in Abuse Case Close to Pope
The priest at the center of a German sex-abuse scandal that has embroiled Pope Benedict XVI was suspended Monday, more than 30 years after the church first heard allegations that he had molested children.

The priest, Peter Hullermann, was suspended after church officials acknowledged in a statement on Friday that he had continued working with children even after being forbidden in 2008. His supervisor, Prelate Josef Obermaier, resigned, according to the Archdiocese of Munich and Freising.

In 1980, Benedict, then archbishop there, approved Father Hullermann's move to Munich after he was accused of sexually abusing boys in the Diocese of Essen, though on Friday a deputy took full responsibility for allowing the priest to return to full pastoral duties shortly thereafter. Father Hullermann was convicted of sexually abusing children in the Bavarian town of Grafing in June 1986 by a district court in nearby Ebersberg, church officials said Friday.

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 04:43:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Where did he slap them after the law was changed?
by asdf on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 01:01:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Guardian: 'Shakespeare's lost play' no hoax, says expert

It has thrills, spills, sword fights, violent sexual assault and - to modern ears - a terrible ending, but the little-known 18th century play Double Falsehood was propelled into the literary limelight today when it was claimed as a lost Shakespeare.

Professor Brean Hammond of Nottingham University will publish compelling new evidence next week that the play, a romantic tragi-comedy by Lewis Theobald is - as the author always maintained it was - substantially based on a real Shakespeare play called Cardenio.

Hammond has been backed in his assertion by the Shakespeare publisher Arden and there are unconfirmed rumours that the play will open at the Royal Shakespeare Company's Swan Theatre in Stratford when the venue reopens after its three-year closure

by Sassafras on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 04:36:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]
BBC: Dotcom web address celebrates silver anniversary

The internet celebrates a landmark event on the 15 March - the 25th birthday of the day the first dotcom name was registered.

In March 1985, Symbolics computers of Cambridge, Massachusetts entered the history books with an internet address ending in dotcom.

That same year another five companies jumped on a very slow bandwagon.

It took until 1997, well into the internet boom, before the one millionth dotcom was registered.

by Sassafras on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 05:05:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 03:22:52 PM EST
Guardian: How going green may make you mean

According to a study, when people feel they have been morally virtuous by saving the planet through their purchases of organic baby food, for example, it leads to the "licensing [of] selfish and morally questionable behaviour", otherwise known as "moral balancing" or "compensatory ethics".

Do Green Products Make Us Better People is published in the latest edition of the journal Psychological Science. Its authors, Canadian psychologists Nina Mazar and Chen-Bo Zhong, argue that people who wear what they call the "halo of green consumerism" are less likely to be kind to others, and more likely to cheat and steal.

by Sassafras on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 04:40:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Oh whatever fucking next.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 05:11:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Tsk.  Watch that compensatory aggression there, afew...
by Sassafras on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 05:21:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I know, it's the organic baby food...
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 05:28:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]
So here's my theory: After years of eating recycled cardboard and living in an unheated house, the environmental purist builds up points that allow him to go out and buy the biggest gas hog of a pickup truck available.

I have proof.

by asdf on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 01:02:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I positively don't know a naturalist who sniffs at anyone whose home can be endured without Arctic clothing and drives a 4x4.
by Sassafras on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 02:09:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]
mon dukes! il est dans l'ADN.

"We are here to try to understand you before judging you."


Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.

by Cat on Mon Mar 15th, 2010 at 06:42:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]