Sarko On The Skids

by afew
Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 06:57:21 AM EST

I first said this a week ago about the rumour around the French president's marriage to Carla Bruni. The first-round regional election results on Sunday now leave a political situation in which Sarkozy's capacity to persuade people he is leading the country in a coherent manner is plainly revealed as nil, and in which his majority-building strategy, based on a single pro-presidential party on the right, is crumbling.

So was the first round of an "exclusively regional" election an epiphany? It looks like it. First, by the extremely low turnout, less than 50%. Next, by the defeat for the right: the left of the political spectrum comes out solidly ahead. Then, by the destruction, willed by Sarkozy and his advisors, of the centrist right: there is now no identifiable party capable of drawing centre-right voters, while François Bayrou's would-be independent centrist party, the MoDem, is a fast-sinking ship. Finally, by the resurrection as a player of the Front National, with between 11% and 12% of the vote, and able to contest the second round of the election in twelve regions (out of 22).

Add to this, that Sarkozy's personal inconsistency and lack of vision have entered the field of mass perception as he has lost control of the media cycle. Even with help from media-owning friends, non-stop communication, photo ops, declarations and promises backed by the appearance of action, end by wearying the electorate. Once belief, or the suspension of disbelief, is lost, the presidential image can go very quickly downhill. So, the phrase has been going the rounds, of the "Kleenex president", the one you use and throw away: and the meme has not come from the opposition, but from Sarko's own side.


The UMP strategy, the one hegemonic party that would include the former Gaullists, the former centre-right, extend to the far right to siphon off Le Pen's electorate, and cross the lines into the soft belly of the left, has also taken a big hit.

It depended, on one side, on "opening up" towards Socialists who could be tempted away with job offers. In itself, that works depressingly well, given the number of takers and wannabes lining up to "work for the good of the country", but, at the same time, it offers the disadvantage of frustrating and blunting the motivation of the conservative base. Sarko has held out so many lollipops to the kids on the "centre left", that the kids in his own gang are feeling deprived and jealous.

The failure on the other side, the far right, is more momentous. There's been plenty of comment on ET about Sarkozism's deliberate playing to the rightwing gallery on immigration and security, and I've written before on the recuperation of the symbols of the Résistance at the same time as power has communicated strongly on Vichy-replica concepts like "national identity": the muddying of the waters, the attempted rewriting of the popular perception of history. It's important to note that the appeal to Le Pen's electorate is what allowed Sarkozy to win in 2007. The appeal doesn't seem to be working any more: what a certain portion of the working class, suffering from the crisis, wants is not communication on symbols, but defence of its interests by means of throwing immigrants out of the country. The FN is back in the game with a mighty wish for revenge on Sarko.

The remaining two years or so of Sarko's five-year mandate look bleak (for him). This is likely to have an effect on the continuing subjacent programme of neoliberal "reform" that is Sarkozism's real work. Sarko announced in the middle-class conservative Fig-Mag last week that there would be a lull in "reform" in the second part of next year (just before the elections in 2012). The "lull" is likely to begin sooner.

Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password

Display:
From an article in Le Monde:

Malgré la défaite, Nicolas Sarkozy garde le cap - LeMonde.frIn spite of the defeat, Nicolas Sarkozy steers the same course [note by afew: headline in contradiction with the contents of the article]
"Les Français ont peur. Ils nous savent en faillite. Ils ne voient pas d'issue pour le pays et pour leurs proches, et constatent avec consternation l'inefficacité du sarkozysme, analyse un proche du président."The French are frightened. They know we're bankrupt. They can't see any way out for the country or for their families, and they are dismayed to note the inefficiency of Sarkozism," is the analysis of someone close to the president.

This is not just standard "experts say" or "analysts consider", the article is by a well-informed and -connected journalist and the quotes are verbatim. When presidential advisors are willing to say this kind of thing, albeit anonymously, it's a sign: just as the speed with which the rumour of the separation of Sarkozy and Bruni took hold was a sign.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 07:03:14 AM EST
note by afew: headline in contradiction with the contents of the article

Say it isn't so!

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 07:17:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Le Monde mustn't upset the apple cart.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 07:40:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Considering the turnout, is the FN 'resurrection' not over-valued? In absolute numbers, the FN dropped more than a third of its votes vs. 2004 (the same as in the 2009 EP elections vs. 2004), and Le Pen got even more in the 2007 Presidential. And far-right voters tend to turn out strongly in domestic elections whatever other people do, giving them a higher share when overall turnout is low.

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.
by DoDo on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 02:52:52 PM EST
That's what some people are saying. But Sarkozy was credited with having neutralised the FN by siphoning off its electorate (while Le Pen was seen as finished). It's pretty clear the movement is not dead, and that Le Pen's daughter Marine is doing rather well as she takes over from him.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 03:36:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Looking at comparable elections (Wikipedia.fr):

Regional elections, 1st round, 1992: Front National 13.9%
Parliamentary elections, 1st round, 1997: FN 14.9%
Parliamentary elections, 1st round, 2002: FN 11.3%
Regional elections, 1st round, 2004: FN 14.7%
Parliamentary elections, 1st round, 2007: FN 4.3%
Regional elections, 1st round, 2010: FN 11.4%

You'll note the only outliers: the 2007 "legislatives" in the wake of Sarkozy's victory at the Presidency. This is when Sarko was widely credited for having siphoned off the FN electorate and the FN's themes of "Immigration & National Identity": he then created the namesake Ministry and appointed the infamous Hortefeux at it.

Bottom line? The FN is now back to its historical average, and rather to the bottom part of it, it seems.


Europeans think a hundred miles is a long way. Americans think a hundred years is a long time.

by Bernard on Tue Mar 16th, 2010 at 05:12:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
In absolute numbers, which I argued to count more for the far-right:

Regional elections (one round), 1992: FN 3,371,624
Parliamentary elections, 1st round, 1993: FN 3,152,543
Parliamentary elections, 1st round, 1997: FN 3,800,785
Regional elections (one round), 1998: FN 3,271,686
Parliamentary elections, 1st round, 2002: FN 2,862,960, splitters MNR 276,376, together 3,139,336
Regional elections, 1st round, 2004: FN 3,564,059, MNR 349,181, together 3,913,240
Parliamentary elections, 1st round, 2007: FN 1,116,136
Regional elections, 1st round, 2010: FN 2,223,760

That's far off the historical levels for 2010, even if twice the level of the 2007 outlier.

As a separate series:
Presidential elections, 1st round, 1995: Le Pen 4,571,138
Presidential elections, 1st round, 2002: Le Pen 4,804,772, Bruno Mégret 667,043, together 5,471,815
Presidential elections, 2nd round, 2002: Le Pen 5,525,034
Presidential elections, 1st round, 2007: Le Pen 3,834,530

Again as a separate series:
European elections, 1994: FN 2,050,086
European elections, 1999: FN 1,005,225, MNR 578,774, together 1,583,999
European elections, 2004: FN 1,684,947
European elections, 2009: FN 1,091,691

*Traitor*, n.
A benighted individual who perceives an illusory distinction between serving his nation and abetting the criminals who govern it.

by DoDo on Wed Mar 17th, 2010 at 04:41:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The main point is perception. The FN was supposed to have been eaten up by Sarkozy (and dying out with its ageing chief). It now appears to everyone that this is not so. Ergo, the FN is back in the game.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Wed Mar 17th, 2010 at 04:54:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
... with daughter Le Pen.

Europeans think a hundred miles is a long way. Americans think a hundred years is a long time.
by Bernard on Wed Mar 17th, 2010 at 06:26:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I think the key point isn't that the FN itself is on the rise (it's numbers are not terrific) but that it has resisted assimilation into the UMP-fold.  This says far more about the UMP than it does the FN, which is living to fight another day with the same army whereas UMP put it's eggs in the far-right basket and appears to be coming away empty.
by paving on Wed Mar 17th, 2010 at 02:49:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]