The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
by afew Sat Oct 13th, 2012 at 03:42:20 PM EST
On Friday's episode of "Real Time with Bill Maher," Maher wondered why conservative Christians who claim to do God's work always manage to screw up so badly. "If you're doing God's work and God is perfect, how come you're always wrong?" he wonders. "Is the problem that you can't follow instructions, or is Jesus just dicking you around?" Maher revisits a 2008 letter sent out by Focus on the Family detailing the horrors that would befall the nation if Barack Obama won the Presidency. As Maher points out, not a single one of the group's 34 dire predictions came to pass: school children still say the Pledge of Allegiance and the government has not seized everyone's guns. Maher admits that Focus in the Family is in the business of scaring "rubes" into giving them money, so the truth is not their highest priority. "But 0 for 34?" he asks in disbelief. Watch Maher eviscerate the right-wing group below.
Reading the Nov. 2012 California propositions so you don't have to. Von überall könnte das Volk, Urbrut alles Undemokratischen, Zelle des Terrors, über die gewählten Hüter von Wachstum und Wohlstand® kommen. - flatter
So that's already 2 horrors. Others include Guantanamo still being in operation, of course. And capital being taxed at a discount rate.
Seems that there are plenty of them around. Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's need, but not every man's greed. Gandhi
Many pundits write or speak of the Hollywood Left, and whether there's any there to that supposed there, this film was a clear piece of right wing disinformation. Plus, it was a truly horrible film, with no clear attempt at being filmic or even interesting.
(I have never read a single review or description of this film, in fact had forgotten it was made. I have no perception of what others think.)
Eastwood has made a brilliant feignt against the horror legacy that was hoover, the legacy of red scare, national security, homeland security, the Patriot Act, and all destruction of the fantasy that was the amurkan dream.
Brilliantly done, it made Hoover a flawed, even sick, man... but one who was ultimately driven by a love for protecting "his country," read TPTB.
The focus was on the secret files Hoover obtained through his perverse illegality with supreme power. the film shows Eleanor Roosevelt as a lesbian, and Kennedy as a philanderer, and King enjoying sex. And Hoover as just a Machiavellian character in a Machiavellian world.
Ignoring the unchecked violent, lawless abuse of power at the heart of Hoover's FBI. Which results in the horror that is democracy today.
brian grazer, hairdresser tuned propagandist using his whollyweird power, has produced one for the books. Look over here, Jedgar was a weird person with the protection of the country at his heart.
Jedgar perhaps was weird, in a psychopathic way, in the way of addiction to power. But he also set the stage for today's homeland security, with targeted assassination of radicals, and invasion with tanks and helicopters and arsenals of arsenals against people who will go down in history as non-violent freedom fighters.
Lesson: there is no more powerful force for social change than control of the media.
But this film is from a talented filmmaker who talks to empty chairs when supporting a powerful puppet for president.
(why am i so dedicated as to watch this shit?) "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
with targeted assassination of radicals, and invasion with tanks and helicopters and arsenals of arsenals against people who will go down in history as non-violent freedom fighters.
Was not referring to drones against Taliban and weddings. WAS referring to assassinations of left wing radicals in the US, and the armed attack against AIM at Wounded Knee.
(and i consider myself to be scientifically spiritual. yet i always must refer to violence in this "civilization." "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
-- Can't Eatwood "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
anyone seen it? It's a fine line between homage, parody, and consumer opportunism. Jess Walter
charlie brooker is fantastic when he's on, less so in his guardian columns. It's a fine line between homage, parody, and consumer opportunism. Jess Walter
Responding to misinformation:
http://www.anecdote.com.au/archives/2012/10/how_to_respond.html
This is a really bad post, with no evidence listed, but it syncs up with the evidence I've seen. So maybe it's a starting point...
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U.K.H., Seifert, C.M., Schwarz, N. & Cook, J. 2012, 'Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing', Psychological Science in the Public Interest, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 106-31. Cialdini, R.B. 1993, Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion, Quill Publishers, New York.
Cialdini, R.B. 1993, Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion, Quill Publishers, New York.
The worse way to combat misinformation is to just set the record straight by merely setting out the facts: our strategy was created by the executive over a three week period we used a well defined and accepted strategy formulation method the board has approved the strategy and all the executives are committed to its execution It turns out that by simply stating the facts merely reinforces the misinformation. The original story gets stronger.
So what do you do? Well, you can only displace a story with a better story. And in fact you need to tell two stories to correct misinformation. The first story should explain how the misinformation happened in the first place. ... The second story should then explain what actually happened.
...
The second story should then explain what actually happened.
A couple of caveats. 1) The stories you tell must be what happened: no spin. 2) Your leaders must be able to tell these stories orally and tell them often.
Or if you're Republican, you can just lie.
I already have Cialdini's Persuasion. It's recommended for non-Machiavellians.
you can only displace a story with a better story
Better can be about the techne of storytelling - or it can be about the way the story plays into existing frames.
But also, it's about finding ways to undermine/subvert the stories that the opposition are using - or their linkage with existing frames.
What's depressing is that repetition is very powerful, but on the left we have no media ownership, so straight repetition cannot be the linchpin of the strategy.
I'm working on a diary about this, I mostly put this comment up as reminder for later...
"We hired Bob based largely on his demonstrated ability to generate effective strategies and for the similarity between the challenges he faced in his previous position and those we face. So he did, to a considerable degree, adapt what had worked previously to our situation. There were several meetings with the Board and others to confirm the appropriateness of this strategy for our challenges."
Unless those assertions are laughably absurd on their face that should work. They also could add:
"This minimized the time and money we would otherwise had to have spend on expensive 'strategy consultants'." As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
Study links eating chocolate to winning Nobels
5:32PM EDT October 10. 2012 - Take this with a grain of salt, or perhaps some almonds or hazelnuts: A study ties chocolate consumption to the number of Nobel Prize winners a country has and suggests it's a sign that the sweet treat can boost brain power.No, this does not appear in the satirical Onion newspaper. It's in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine, which published it online Wednesday as a "note" rather than a rigorous, peer-reviewed study.The author -- Dr. Franz Messerli, of St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital and Columbia University in New York -- writes that there is evidence that flavanols in green tea, red wine and chocolate can help "in slowing down or even reversing" age-related mental decline -- a contention some medical experts may dispute.
5:32PM EDT October 10. 2012 - Take this with a grain of salt, or perhaps some almonds or hazelnuts: A study ties chocolate consumption to the number of Nobel Prize winners a country has and suggests it's a sign that the sweet treat can boost brain power.
No, this does not appear in the satirical Onion newspaper. It's in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine, which published it online Wednesday as a "note" rather than a rigorous, peer-reviewed study.
The author -- Dr. Franz Messerli, of St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital and Columbia University in New York -- writes that there is evidence that flavanols in green tea, red wine and chocolate can help "in slowing down or even reversing" age-related mental decline -- a contention some medical experts may dispute.
(Man, that's going to be incomprehensible to future generations.) -----sapere aude
There was a close, significant linear correlation (r=0.791, P<0.0001) between chocolate consumption per capita and the number of Nobel laureates per 10 million persons in a total of 23 countries). When recalculated with the exclusion of Sweden, the correlation coefficient increased to 0.862. Switzerland was the top performer in terms of both the number of Nobel laureates and chocolate consumption. The slope of the regression line allows us to estimate that it would take about 0.4 kg of chocolate per capita per year to increase the number of Nobel laureates in a given country by 1. For the United States, that would amount to 125 million kg per year. The minimally effective chocolate dose seems to hover around 2 kg per year, and the dose-response curve reveals no apparent ceiling on the number of Nobel laureates at the highest chocolate-dose level of 11 kg per year.
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMon1211064
Hmmm. 11 kg per year is around 200 grams per week. That's only two of those familiar Lindt chocolate bars containers per week...
No! MRI imaging of broccoli. I distribute. You re-distribute. He gives your hard-earned money to lazy scroungers. -- JakeS
I think this is an appropriate development concurrent with the ongoing devaluation of the Peace Prize. Why is the Nobel committee so involved in current politics? Why are they using the prize as an advance payment to influence current events instead of rewarding people who have actually effected positive developments?
or the nobel committee has fused with the onion... It's a fine line between homage, parody, and consumer opportunism. Jess Walter
Still, I'm happy the Norwegians are the ones who have to deal with the Peace Prize. Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
Feels a bit like "right complete bastard at the right time" Churchill constantly winning "Greatest Briton". -----sapere aude
Visit the State of Enchantment. Jump out of a balloon. Buy our wonderful native Arts & Crafts on the way down." (P.S. Cash or Credit Card only)
(P.S. Cash or Credit Card only)
wonder why he didn't free fall longer, had something unplanned happened? "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
The unbeaten free fall record without a drogue parachute (for initial stabilization) belongs to a Russian.
(To be honest, I don't really understand either. I only pretend to.) It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
That's it.
gambling and testosterone are joined at the hip. It's a fine line between homage, parody, and consumer opportunism. Jess Walter
From a woman's perspective men are secretly schzoid:
According to Ralph Klein, there are many fundamentally schizoid individuals who present with an engaging, interactive personality style which contradicts the observable characteristic emphasized by the DSM-IV and ICD-10 definitions of the schizoid personality. Klein classifies these individuals as secret schizoids, presenting themselves as socially available, interested, engaged, and involved in interacting in the eyes of the observer, while at the same time remaining emotionally withdrawn and sequestered within the safety of the internal world.
Offsetting this, from a male perspective, women exhibit Historinic personality disorder:
characterized by a pattern of excessive emotionality and attention-seeking, including an excessive need for approval and inappropriately seductive behavior, usually beginning in early adulthood.
So there you have it. Both genders think the other needs psychological intervention.
:-) Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
and if they are under such a tree, then the leaves falling off it will stain the yurt unless you climb onto the roof and sweep them off.
i guess trees are scarce on the steppes, and too much heat is no problem in mongolia! they do get warm really fast in the winter with a stove, but the first one up in the morning has to brave the freezing temperature to light it! It's a fine line between homage, parody, and consumer opportunism. Jess Walter
by DoDo - May 20 9 comments
by Nomad - May 10 14 comments
by JakeS - May 15 7 comments
by Metatone - May 14 85 comments
by ARGeezer - May 16 13 comments
by gmoke - May 17 1 comment
by DoDo - May 12 10 comments
by Migeru - May 6 100 comments
by DoDo - May 209 comments
by gmoke - May 171 comment
by ARGeezer - May 1613 comments
by JakeS - May 157 comments
by Metatone - May 1485 comments
by DoDo - May 1210 comments
by Nomad - May 1014 comments
by Migeru - May 78 comments
by marco - May 782 comments
by Migeru - May 6100 comments
by Ted Welch - May 35 comments
by afew - May 340 comments
by ceebs - May 26 comments
by gmoke - Apr 301 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 3067 comments
by joelado - Apr 2954 comments
by Metatone - Apr 2854 comments
by ATinNM - Apr 275 comments
by ceebs - Apr 265 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2686 comments