Welcome to the new version of European Tribune. It's just a new layout, so everything should work as before - please report bugs here.

Economic Populist: Capping Bush Tax Cuts fixes over half of US fiscal problem

by BruceMcF Sat Nov 17th, 2012 at 01:45:48 PM EST

Burning the Midnight Oil for Economic Populism

Crossposted from Voices on the Square

Among the many things entirely lost in the mainstream US media coverage of the US "fiscal cliff" are the nature and magnitude of the country's fiscal challenge. The magnitude is why it is not a crisis, and the nature is why we would be better off "just doing nothing" ~ letting the whole Bush tax cuts expire and scrapping the zombie spending cuts ~ is better than the vast majority of "fixes" floating around in the mainstream media.


What is the Nature and Magnitude of the Country's Fiscal Challenge

What matters in debt is the size of the debt as a percentage of the Federal budget. Luckily the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities has run the numbers: under the status quo, the share is projected to rise from roughly 72.5 to roughly 82.5% over the coming decade. That is a challenge, but that magnitude of increase in the debt share is no crisis.

And the share will be dropping over the five years ahead, so the challenge is not an urgent challenge. Its something that allows us to pursue policies that require over a full Presidential term to yield fruit. Not only is the challenge not a crisis, neither is it urgent.

How Much Will Be Left After Capping The Bush Tax Cuts

The proposed Bush Tax Cut cap will yield about $1T in deficit reduction, so that's $1T to go, right?

Wrong: cutting $2T can be accomplished by a mix of $1.72T of tax revenues and spending cuts, because cutting the debt ratio will reduce the interest burden, and save $260b in interest payments.

Who has already contributed?

We have already had several years of austerity budgeting, with discretionary, non-defense spending cut by $1.5T.

A truly "balanced approach" of 1:1, that cut 1/3 of that from non-defense spending and 2/3 from defense spending, and matched that dollar for dollar with tax increases, would see $1.365b added in revenue, and $1.365b cut from spending, $0.455b from non-defense and the $0.91T from defense.

Achieving balance would involve the Bush Tax Cut cap, $365b in other tax revenue over the coming ten years ~ converting the biggest income tax deductions into tax credits at the tax rate of middle income taxpayers would likely accomplish that ~ $910b in defense cuts ...

... and $1.05T in increases in non-defense discretionary spending.

You will, of course, hear none of this in the corporate mess media.

But what if we can't do that?

If we can't get anything done except canceling the stupid thing Congress promised to do as a threat in case they didn't get anything done ... and the entire Bush Tax cuts expire ...

... obviously the Republicans will cave on letting the capped Bush Tax cuts get extended rather than getting nothing passed.

If they don't, and we just go back to the Clinton tax rates, that would mean there is even less that would need to be done to get to fiscal balance, so even less need to cut spending.

If they do cave, debt will still be on a track to decline as a share of GDP over the next four or five years, and we might want to do something about spending cuts in 2017.

But its no crisis either way.

Message from Marley: Every little thing, gonna be alright

Anyway, if people try to tell you that it will be a massive economic disaster if we do not urgently "do something, anything about the debt!!!" ...

Display:
This aint but a hilltop for the first three months or so.



I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Sat Nov 17th, 2012 at 01:54:03 PM EST
It isn't a fiscal cliff, it's a fiscal bluff, and it needs called.
by rifek on Sun Nov 18th, 2012 at 07:57:00 PM EST
Too true.

(To this european, the word has an Old West feel. Anyone up for heading them off at the pass?

Heh. MST3K voices in my head. "Quantitative Easing of the Old West." Was it Crow/Bill Corbett who used to do that? I'm sure it occurred before the SyFy era.)


-----
sapere aude

by Number 6 on Mon Nov 19th, 2012 at 12:07:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Way before SyFy, but it lives on.  My kids have decided that, in the Star Wars/Cops mash-up Troops, the storm troopers were perfectly justified in killing the Jawas because the Jawas had kidnapped Tom Servo.
by rifek on Tue Nov 20th, 2012 at 07:11:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Filthy creatures.

(Another early line made that much more uncomfortable by Jar-Jar.)


-----
sapere aude

by Number 6 on Thu Nov 22nd, 2012 at 04:38:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Display:
Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]

Top Diaries