The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
by afew Fri Dec 28th, 2012 at 11:54:07 AM EST
The departing head of Belgium's nuclear watchdog Willy De Roovere has courted controversy by making a remarkable pronouncement as he prepares to leave the industry. Mr De Roovere says that he does not think that the risks linked to nuclear energy are acceptable today. Willy De Roovere worked for Electrabel, Belgium's main energy generator for many years before he went on to head the FANC, the Federal Agency for Nuclear Control, the nuclear industry's watchdog. He leaves the FANC at the end of the year. 2012 has been an important year for the nuclear industry both at home and abroad. Minute cracks were uncovered in the nuclear reactors at Doel and Tihange and two reactors were taken out of service. In January the FANC is expected to advise the government that the reactors that have stood idle for over six months can be restarted. Against the backdrop of the Fukushima disaster in Japan Mr De Roovere makes a number of remarkable pronouncement for a man who has spent most of his working life in the nuclear sector: "We have to live with the fact that there is always some risk attached to nuclear energy. We should also ask ourselves whether this risk is acceptable for our society. I believe today that it is no longer acceptable." "When we see the risk of nuclear energy, then I would prefer other forms of energy, but the issue must be debated: if we drop nuclear and China does not, then of course this will have an economic impact."
The departing head of Belgium's nuclear watchdog Willy De Roovere has courted controversy by making a remarkable pronouncement as he prepares to leave the industry. Mr De Roovere says that he does not think that the risks linked to nuclear energy are acceptable today.
Willy De Roovere worked for Electrabel, Belgium's main energy generator for many years before he went on to head the FANC, the Federal Agency for Nuclear Control, the nuclear industry's watchdog. He leaves the FANC at the end of the year.
2012 has been an important year for the nuclear industry both at home and abroad. Minute cracks were uncovered in the nuclear reactors at Doel and Tihange and two reactors were taken out of service. In January the FANC is expected to advise the government that the reactors that have stood idle for over six months can be restarted.
Against the backdrop of the Fukushima disaster in Japan Mr De Roovere makes a number of remarkable pronouncement for a man who has spent most of his working life in the nuclear sector: "We have to live with the fact that there is always some risk attached to nuclear energy. We should also ask ourselves whether this risk is acceptable for our society. I believe today that it is no longer acceptable."
"When we see the risk of nuclear energy, then I would prefer other forms of energy, but the issue must be debated: if we drop nuclear and China does not, then of course this will have an economic impact."
I guess my cynicism comes from a feeling that we're a few years past the point where gestures alone are laudable. The world is going to hell and everyone is just wringing their hands keep to the Fen Causeway
"A private company puts mainly its priorities on the high risks it could be involved in. At FANC-AFCN all risks, even the smallest ones need to be addressed because otherwise parliamentary questions will push you to do something about those smaller risk items. Perception that people might have is also an element to be considered by the FANC-AFCN." Then recent events have also caused him to reassess his views and his comments come as a major report by the FANC-AFCN is about to be published: "Design was made sometimes 30 or 40 years ago, when the conditions were quite different from now. Thinking about the terrorist attack on the Twin Towers, we will now have a lot of conditions for new plants and also for the existing plants related to the required robustness against terrorist attacks. After the Fukushima event, we try to add extra protections not taking into account probabilities anymore. Initial design was mainly linked to probabilities. If the probability of an occurrence was low, then nothing was required about protecting against that. Nowadays, after the Fukushima event or the Twin Towers attack, the philosophy has changed. We assume a probability equal to one, we focus on what could happen to the plant and see whether we will be able to sustain cooling and avoid a big problem impacting people and the environment." ... Fukushima was a consequence of electricity grid and cooling losses. As a result, the purpose of the Stress Tests is not to look at the damages done at a nuclear power station by an aircraft crash but is more focused on the effect of such events (natural or man-made) on the internal electricity grid or cooling systems. In other terms, the purpose is to keep cooling systems operational even if the reactor building has been significantly damaged. The Stress Tests report was given by the operators to the FANC-AFCN on 28st of October and the agency will comment and make the report definitive on December 31st of this year. There will finally be a Peer Review process at the European level during the first four months of 2012." http://www.bnsorg.eu/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=147:willy-deroovere&ca tid=37:interviews&Itemid=109
"A private company puts mainly its priorities on the high risks it could be involved in. At FANC-AFCN all risks, even the smallest ones need to be addressed because otherwise parliamentary questions will push you to do something about those smaller risk items. Perception that people might have is also an element to be considered by the FANC-AFCN."
Then recent events have also caused him to reassess his views and his comments come as a major report by the FANC-AFCN is about to be published:
"Design was made sometimes 30 or 40 years ago, when the conditions were quite different from now. Thinking about the terrorist attack on the Twin Towers, we will now have a lot of conditions for new plants and also for the existing plants related to the required robustness against terrorist attacks. After the Fukushima event, we try to add extra protections not taking into account probabilities anymore. Initial design was mainly linked to probabilities. If the probability of an occurrence was low, then nothing was required about protecting against that. Nowadays, after the Fukushima event or the Twin Towers attack, the philosophy has changed. We assume a probability equal to one, we focus on what could happen to the plant and see whether we will be able to sustain cooling and avoid a big problem impacting people and the environment."
... Fukushima was a consequence of electricity grid and cooling losses. As a result, the purpose of the Stress Tests is not to look at the damages done at a nuclear power station by an aircraft crash but is more focused on the effect of such events (natural or man-made) on the internal electricity grid or cooling systems. In other terms, the purpose is to keep cooling systems operational even if the reactor building has been significantly damaged. The Stress Tests report was given by the operators to the FANC-AFCN on 28st of October and the agency will comment and make the report definitive on December 31st of this year. There will finally be a Peer Review process at the European level during the first four months of 2012."
http://www.bnsorg.eu/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=147:willy-deroovere&ca tid=37:interviews&Itemid=109
amnesia, it's the new black(out). It's a fine line between homage, parody, and consumer opportunism. Jess Walter
the small differences are driving me crazy, when I'm doing a message everything is in the wrong place. and I transferred half my contacts manually because of some glitch. When i'd finished i realised what the problem was and could have solved it quite easily....Doh !!!!!
now the colour on the telly is playing up and so have to get a new one. thank god for the sales keep to the Fen Causeway
;) Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
All our problems are down to sociopaths down through the ages.
Here endeth the Gospel of Sven the Oversimplifier. You can't be me, I'm taken
I can never work out how why people think the media is accurate outside their realm of expertise when they know how crap it is on matters they have knowledge of.
"Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
I always like the effect you get of sunlight caught low on catenary wires in hazy autumn light, but I've not got the camera smarts to catch it keep to the Fen Causeway
Lots more at the link:
Man Walks All Day to Create Massive Snow Patterns (Part 2) "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
Listen to a masterwork by a Mob accessory. And read how Watertown came to be. You can't be me, I'm taken
They were Kings, They knew it, with Grace.
PS. You all are aware i've met a fair amount of famous people in my dissolute life, and even kissed a few, but i never met a Beatle. I did have a carpenter friend who worked on John's apartment, but he never took me up there to see the White Room Piano. (yeah ok, Ringo shook my hand once, and thanked me for coming, but that was thirty years later, when i was beginning to wise up. Still...)
Mr. Sinatra, i'll see your drunken attempt at Berlin, and raise you some Spirit. "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
The second set of three songs set it all in motion.
And then there's another geezer's music, a few months ago.
"finding my religion, i might be a pagan" "i used to dig picasso, then the big tech giant turned him into wallpaper." "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
by JakeS - May 15 7 comments
by ARGeezer - May 16 10 comments
by Nomad - May 10 14 comments
by Metatone - May 14 85 comments
by gmoke - May 17
by DoDo - May 12 10 comments
by Migeru - May 6 100 comments
by Migeru - May 7 8 comments
by ARGeezer - May 1610 comments
by JakeS - May 157 comments
by Metatone - May 1485 comments
by DoDo - May 1210 comments
by Nomad - May 1014 comments
by Migeru - May 78 comments
by marco - May 782 comments
by Migeru - May 6100 comments
by Ted Welch - May 35 comments
by afew - May 340 comments
by ceebs - May 26 comments
by gmoke - Apr 301 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 3067 comments
by joelado - Apr 2954 comments
by Metatone - Apr 2854 comments
by ATinNM - Apr 275 comments
by ceebs - Apr 265 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2686 comments
by In Wales - Apr 2136 comments