The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
by dvx Sat Dec 29th, 2012 at 11:15:19 AM EST
THE collapse of John Boehner's "Plan B" reveals the Republican Party to be in a politically disastrous position. The media narrative is shaping up to pin the full blame for sending the country over the fiscal cliff on the Republicans. News coverage of Mr Boehner is characterised by a mixture of disdain and pity. The tea-party congressmen who have sabotaged his position are portrayed as delusional zealots unable to connect their professed goals to their actions in a rational fashion.
The media narrative is shaping up to pin the full blame for sending the country over the fiscal cliff on the Republicans. News coverage of Mr Boehner is characterised by a mixture of disdain and pity. The tea-party congressmen who have sabotaged his position are portrayed as delusional zealots unable to connect their professed goals to their actions in a rational fashion.
O/T.
This diary is why I still read dKos:
What is the economic value of trust? The old saying goes that a liar doesn't trust anyone. Another old saying is that there is no honor among thieves. What happens when liars and thieves run the entire show? When liars and thieves are in all the positions of economic and political power? Eventually the honest and trusting public will catch on. The rules have changed, and now there aren't any rules. That's when society starts changing.
The old saying goes that a liar doesn't trust anyone. Another old saying is that there is no honor among thieves.
What happens when liars and thieves run the entire show? When liars and thieves are in all the positions of economic and political power?
Eventually the honest and trusting public will catch on. The rules have changed, and now there aren't any rules.
That's when society starts changing.
Worth a read. Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
if you take the view that the rule of law and a functioning property register are some of the key institutional factors explaining the success of capitalism in the last couple hundred years, you're potentially looking at the end of capitalism as we know it in the US. The alternative is a complete rout of the US financial system, which is another way for capitalism as we know it in the US to, if not end, at least get reset to a tabula rasa.
But more people will read it on dKos. Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
the status quo is too far to the right in favour of parasitic and rapacious financialism. There is currently no sign of a corrective leftist sentiment in either Europe or the USA. And so we will carry on towards the precipice and I fear what happens after that keep to the Fen Causeway
Via a regular reader Wind power
Guns = clean as a whistle (and more of them than we want to see).
Cheeses = dirty and forbidden (and a bum rap in a trade war).
University builds cheap supercomputer with Raspberry Pi and Legos:
Inspired by the low-cost computing power of the Raspberry Pi, a team at the University of Southampton has used the ARM-based Linux computer-on-a-board as a building block for a low-cost supercomputer--racked and stacked using Lego blocks. And they've published a step-by-step guide for anyone interested in creating their own Raspberry Pi high-performance computing "bramble."
Why they would build something this cool and then shove a 43 year old bloat-ware, conceptually obsolete, O/S on it is a bit of a crime but that's the way it goes. Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
Software Watson's software was written in various languages, including at least Java, C++, and Prolog and uses Apache Hadoop framework for distributed computing, Apache UIMA (Unstructured Information Management Architecture) framework, IBM's DeepQA software and SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 operating system.[8][17][18] "[...] more than 100 different techniques are used to analyze natural language, identify sources, find and generate hypotheses, find and score evidence, and merge and rank hypotheses." [19]
Watson's software was written in various languages, including at least Java, C++, and Prolog and uses Apache Hadoop framework for distributed computing, Apache UIMA (Unstructured Information Management Architecture) framework, IBM's DeepQA software and SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 operating system.[8][17][18] "[...] more than 100 different techniques are used to analyze natural language, identify sources, find and generate hypotheses, find and score evidence, and merge and rank hypotheses." [19]
Emphasis mine. Now where are we going and what's with the handbasket?
Has anyone a satisfactory explanation for the fact that the cerebellum (in general) is wired left to left with the rest of its CNS, while the cerebrum is left to right? You can't be me, I'm taken
My guess is the cerebellum was the original "brain" with the other structures evolving when the cerebellum ran out of room. Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
I learned a long time ago:
a.) I'm not omniscient b.) Not to get my ego 100% wrapped-up in an opinion, view, conclusion, etc. Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
Maricopa County, AZ's notorious Sheriff Joe Arpaio announced Thursday that he will deploy an armed "posse" to guard about 50 local grade schools, middle schools, and high schools, following the NRA's controversial playbook for limiting gun violence. "I have the authority to mobilize private citizens and fight crime in this county," Arpaio said. "We're not talking about placing the posse in the schools right now but in the outlying -- the perimeters of the school -- to detect any criminal activity," he added.
"I have the authority to mobilize private citizens and fight crime in this county," Arpaio said.
"We're not talking about placing the posse in the schools right now but in the outlying -- the perimeters of the school -- to detect any criminal activity," he added.
Groovy. Nothing like a gang of untrained, gun-crazed, psychopaths wandering around to create the proper educational environment. Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
One hundred years ago, in the autumn of 1912, an African-American musician by the name of WC Handy published a song that would take the US by storm - Memphis Blues. It launched the blues as a mass entertainment genre that would transform popular music worldwide.
"Our aging population is making it necessary to keep older people as autonomous as possible for as long as possible, which means caring for aged people is likely to be an important area for the deployment of service robots," the researchers wrote on their website.
And so it begins.... You can't be me, I'm taken
i guess a robot could function for similar things like get you a cup of tea or give you a foot rub even-
i ain't skeered of em basically! bring on our (not particularly) brave new world-
taking care of the elderly can be quite grueling as well as the good parts so if robots can help with that it leaves more time for enjoying human company without feeling bad for others having to inconvenience themselves too much compensating for one's infirmity
friend's keyboard no full stops or commas working sorry! It's a fine line between homage, parody, and consumer opportunism. Jess Walter
Consumers are thus embracing machines to consume content but not replacing their machines to create content. And part of this is that consumers and businesses alike may not want to jump to a new operating system After the debacle that was Windows Vista, Microsoft rebounded with Windows 7. But now with a radically different interface consumers are standoffish.
After the debacle that was Windows Vista, Microsoft rebounded with Windows 7. But now with a radically different interface consumers are standoffish.
I would gladly pay $100 for an operating system that commits to maintaining, to the extent possible, the previous modes of interface while continually improving security and streamlining code. We need a better solution that does not cost a whole lot more. It would be a pleasure to never have to use MS products again in my remaining life. As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
We all know that, however much desired, no s/w company is ever just gonna make annual 30% ROI just fixing the faults of their last bodge. So we have to buy "new improved wonderware, with extra added bs" keep to the Fen Causeway
Secondly, the computer industry is driven by an American assumption Change = Progress.
Combine and you get, well, MicroSoft.
Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
What's weird is their insistence on breaking security to download fixes, patches, applications, etc., ensuring a healthy environment for malware, customer frustration, and "computer rage." It's also dumb since they could sell more product if people had to come into a Point of Sale (RW store) to upgrade, get fixes, purchase applications, get training, & so forth. Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
Windows security holes
It's because (a) security is not part of the basic O/S design, (b) they breach their own security by allowing 'hooks' to enable them to download into program memory, and (c) the hardware boards themselves are insecure.
I've been fighting working with MicroSoft products since 1976 and they've always been intellectually lazy. They find a first approximation of an answer, apply it, and skip the test-and-redesign phases. Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
And the bathroom ceiling had fallen off. Apparently, a leak from the watertank cause that.
Like I needed that... Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's need, but not every man's greed. Gandhi
Or I didn't have 3 people coming over Wednesday night. Well, come to think of it it could have been worse : it would have been four if the two adults had not split at the beginning of the month. Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's need, but not every man's greed. Gandhi
I hope that the insurance will cover us well. Whether it's ours, or the development's one (if the problem comes from a communal part it should be the development's, which would mean they'd pay the franchise, but I doubt it). Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's need, but not every man's greed. Gandhi
:((((
David Blunkett, a man who befouled several Cabinet positions during this period, is now moaning in the Guardian that people aren't on the streets over the current government's cuts.
so some people have taken him to the woodshed. A sample.....
David Blunkett wonders why there is no 1980s-style "revolutionary fervour" in the face of the current deluge of cuts to local government and services (The hidden truth of local cuts will soon be revealed, 28 December). The answer is staring him in the face. New Labour's determination to collude with the neoliberal experiment begun under Margaret Thatcher (Thatcher's role in plan to dismantle welfare state revealed, 28 December) progressively deprived mainstream politics of the language and experience of non-marketised provision for the public good. One result is the cuts to local authority funding that Blunkett bemoans - but in whose ideological underpinning he and his colleagues colluded. Where was the New Labour equivalent of the cabinet "riot" that apparently put a temporary brake on welfare state dismantling in the early days of the Thatcher government? If recent pronouncements are anything to go by, "one nation" Labour seems equally unlikely to change the political weather. Ed Miliband wants to head a party "as much of the private sector as the public sector" (Report, 28 December). The order of words is important - Labour is still on the defensive in the face of the market assault initiated by Thatcher. The signs are that the persuasive counter-commentary you ask for (Editorial, 28 December) will have to come from outside the political mainstream. [xxxx] * David Blunkett asks: "So why isn't there the revolutionary fervour that there was back in the 1980s?" One could extend his question to cover the general lack of resistance to the stream of ideological hatred spewed out by the government. Does it occur to the former home secretary that 13 years of a privatising Labour administration that laid the foundations of academy schools and PFI in the NHS may be part of the answer? [xxxx]
Where was the New Labour equivalent of the cabinet "riot" that apparently put a temporary brake on welfare state dismantling in the early days of the Thatcher government? If recent pronouncements are anything to go by, "one nation" Labour seems equally unlikely to change the political weather. Ed Miliband wants to head a party "as much of the private sector as the public sector" (Report, 28 December). The order of words is important - Labour is still on the defensive in the face of the market assault initiated by Thatcher. The signs are that the persuasive counter-commentary you ask for (Editorial, 28 December) will have to come from outside the political mainstream. [xxxx]
* David Blunkett asks: "So why isn't there the revolutionary fervour that there was back in the 1980s?" One could extend his question to cover the general lack of resistance to the stream of ideological hatred spewed out by the government. Does it occur to the former home secretary that 13 years of a privatising Labour administration that laid the foundations of academy schools and PFI in the NHS may be part of the answer? [xxxx]
who? Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
who?
but what has really got everyone's attention was the apparent plan to assassinate the OWS leadership. Some of the people there who took part have had a bit of a meltdown, which is natural, and are calling for a discussion about what the heck they're doing electing governments which try to kill them keep to the Fen Causeway
that's when it becomes very scary keep to the Fen Causeway
I'm still in kind of a state of shock, but facts matter, and there's a lot of wild speculation flying around. So let me point out what we know, and what we know that we don't know. First: We do not know who "they" are. The FBI document does not tell us. This might be a lone actor, a terrorist organization, or a private security contractor. "If Deemed Necessary" seems to imply one of the latter two, because there was a decision making process that would potentially deem assassination necessary. "Suppressed sniper rifles" seems to suggest multiple shooters, and thus an organized group. We do not know any of this. It could be any of these. This could have been a single actor, and an FBI agent who doesn't write very clearly. Bad writing happens. What is clear, though, is that we need more information. We need answers. We shouldn't jump to conclusions about any of this. What we know is bad enough. What we know is this: "They" were planning an assassination of Occupy leaders. The FBI knew of the plans, and did nothing to warn us, ignoring their own policies. Anything more than that is conjecture."
I'm still in kind of a state of shock, but facts matter, and there's a lot of wild speculation flying around. So let me point out what we know, and what we know that we don't know.
First: We do not know who "they" are. The FBI document does not tell us. This might be a lone actor, a terrorist organization, or a private security contractor. "If Deemed Necessary" seems to imply one of the latter two, because there was a decision making process that would potentially deem assassination necessary. "Suppressed sniper rifles" seems to suggest multiple shooters, and thus an organized group.
We do not know any of this. It could be any of these. This could have been a single actor, and an FBI agent who doesn't write very clearly. Bad writing happens.
What is clear, though, is that we need more information. We need answers.
We shouldn't jump to conclusions about any of this. What we know is bad enough. What we know is this:
Quite, and a reasonable conjecture is that the FBI didn't inform OWS (who ? as pointed out, there were no official leaders) because they didn't find the threats plausible or had seen that the "plan" was just tough talk by some fringe group.
Or maybe not (and I'm no friend of the FBI), but as said above: "facts matter" and as also pointed out, there aren't many at the moment. Maybe it's because I'm a Londoner - that I moved to Nice.
Of course the US has shootings aplenty, and not a few critical and very public assassinations in its history.
So I'm not sure what 'not plausible' means in this context.
In any case, previous 'not plausible' threats by so-called Islamic fundamentalists, which were led and inspired by FBI agents, have resulted in decades of jail time.
But presumably that's different. No one serious cares about OWS protesters.
The fact that there have been shootings does not mean that all threats to do so are equally valid, I'm sure the FBI gets lots of reports of threats and decides some of them are not serious. Not every bar-room boast is serious.
Obviously I'm not defending everything the FBI has done. Like the article's update, I'm noting that there are a lot of unknowns about this case and little has been established as fact:
What is clear, though, is that we need more information. We need answers. We shouldn't jump to conclusions about any of this.
We shouldn't jump to conclusions about any of this.
I'm upset about it but I'm not surprised. Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
by Migeru - Jun 15 39 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 17 20 comments
by Katrin - Jun 12 88 comments
by Jerome a Paris - Jun 9 68 comments
by DoDo - Jun 9 22 comments
by Zwackus - Jun 11 64 comments
by Metatone - Jun 8 4 comments
by Ted Welch - Jun 3 1 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 1720 comments
by Migeru - Jun 1539 comments
by Katrin - Jun 1288 comments
by DoDo - Jun 1126 comments
by Zwackus - Jun 1164 comments
by Jerome a Paris - Jun 968 comments
by DoDo - Jun 922 comments
by Metatone - Jun 84 comments
by DoDo - Jun 671 comments
by DoDo - Jun 417 comments
by Ted Welch - Jun 31 comment
by gmoke - Jun 211 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 3113 comments
by A swedish kind of death - May 3113 comments
by ceebs - May 2927 comments
by ARGeezer - May 2915 comments
by Zwackus - May 271 comment
by DoDo - May 2631 comments
by DoDo - May 2346 comments
by Metatone - May 1490 comments