The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
by In Wales Tue Mar 27th, 2012 at 12:53:37 PM EST
Flying Robots Deliver Tacos To Your Location Our unmanned delivery agents are fast and work tirelessly.
I'm surprised the paps haven't discovered them yet - run a copter with a still camera up to a 6th floor window? Easy. You can have a wireless link to see the picture. It also flies nicely over police lines. A 20K investment. You can't be me, I'm taken
For many years, research has pointed to specific neural pathways as the presumed locus of spiritual thoughts, feelings, and experiences. Famously, studies have shown similar patterns of brain activation in Buddhist meditation and Christian contemplative prayer for example. The majority of this research relies on a simple correlation between observed neurological activity and reported experience. A new study adds to the emerging picture by comparing a measure of spirituality, self-transcendence, both before and after surgical manipulation of the complex architecture of the brain. In fact, for some cancer patients brain surgery led to a spiritual awakening. According to a new paper by Italian researchers Cosimo Urgesi, Salvatore M. Aglioti, Miran Skrap, and Franco Fabbro, selective damage to left and right inferior posterior parietal regions induced an increase in self-report scores on the self-transcendence (ST) scale of the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) (Cloninger et al., 1994). Twin studies have shown that the ST scale is associated with heritability estimates of 0.37 and 0.41 for male and female individuals, respectively (Kirk et al., 1999). Self-transcendence scores measure the extent to which subjects feel connected to or drawn toward an experience beyond their individual lives. People with high levels of self-transcendence often report frequent feelings of "boundlessness" or the loss of awareness of themselves as separate beings. Famously, these kind of "oceanic feelings" as Freud called them, are a common feature in the descriptions of many mystics. The extraordinary religious experience of "union" with God is a common example but increased sensitivity to and appreciation of unity, whether the natural kinship of all living things or the unifying power of human culture can also be associated with "self-transcendence."
For many years, research has pointed to specific neural pathways as the presumed locus of spiritual thoughts, feelings, and experiences. Famously, studies have shown similar patterns of brain activation in Buddhist meditation and Christian contemplative prayer for example. The majority of this research relies on a simple correlation between observed neurological activity and reported experience. A new study adds to the emerging picture by comparing a measure of spirituality, self-transcendence, both before and after surgical manipulation of the complex architecture of the brain. In fact, for some cancer patients brain surgery led to a spiritual awakening.
According to a new paper by Italian researchers Cosimo Urgesi, Salvatore M. Aglioti, Miran Skrap, and Franco Fabbro, selective damage to left and right inferior posterior parietal regions induced an increase in self-report scores on the self-transcendence (ST) scale of the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) (Cloninger et al., 1994). Twin studies have shown that the ST scale is associated with heritability estimates of 0.37 and 0.41 for male and female individuals, respectively (Kirk et al., 1999). Self-transcendence scores measure the extent to which subjects feel connected to or drawn toward an experience beyond their individual lives. People with high levels of self-transcendence often report frequent feelings of "boundlessness" or the loss of awareness of themselves as separate beings. Famously, these kind of "oceanic feelings" as Freud called them, are a common feature in the descriptions of many mystics. The extraordinary religious experience of "union" with God is a common example but increased sensitivity to and appreciation of unity, whether the natural kinship of all living things or the unifying power of human culture can also be associated with "self-transcendence."
:-þ
(lol)
Good catch melo, thanks. Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
:-) Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
Augustin: Ja, auf jeden Fall. Die FDP war mal liberal, ist jetzt neoliberal. Die Leute wollen aber das klassisch Liberale, und das sind wir.
Die Piraten sind eine neue Oppositionspartei - bei ihnen machten vor allem Nichtwähler und enttäuschte Linkenwähler ihr Kreuz, zeigt die Analyse. Aber auch im bürgerlichen Lager sammelten die Piraten Stimmen: Es kamen mehr Wähler von CDU und FDP zu den Landtagsneulingen als von SPD und Grünen.
Another article claims that they got more votes from ex-CDU and FDP voters than from the SPD and the Greens.
8000 from CDU (4000) and FDP (4000) combined 6000 from SPD (3000) and Grüne (3000) combined 7000 from Linke 8000 from non-voters 3000 from other parties
All according to the exits polls the article uses. So by that logic it can as easily be the new Linke (largest single capture from established party) or a party for voters who previously lacked anyone to vote for.
Looking at where the FDP voters went:
12000 CDU 9000 non-voters 8000 SPD etc (white text on yellow backgroud strains my eyes)
So I would say the data does not back Piraten as replacing FDP. A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!
Alternative party, hopes for more open politics, give youths a vote are descriptions many voters agree with. Young voters dominate with Piraten getting 23% of frist-time voters.
I am uncertain of what they have asked in the second question (most important issue?) and what the answer Soziale Gerechtigkeit translates to politically. Anyone who can enlighten me? A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!
Anyway, so social justice is the most important issue for Piraten voters, followed by net politics, education and labor market. A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!
(Swedish or German) Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
On the other hand social justice is fairly unambiguous in German, so the Pirate Party is positioning itself as a left-liberal party.
Whether they have thought it through is the question. Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
EU commissioner Maros Sefcovic, in charge of administration, says salaries for the commission are too low to be attractive to candidates from rich member states. "For some time we are facing quite a serious problem recruiting people from so-called high-wage economies," he said Monday (26 March). The problem goes across the board from entry-level salaries for policy officers (4,349.59 a month before tax) right up to the top bureaucratic posts in the commission.
"For some time we are facing quite a serious problem recruiting people from so-called high-wage economies," he said Monday (26 March).
The problem goes across the board from entry-level salaries for policy officers (4,349.59 a month before tax) right up to the top bureaucratic posts in the commission.
Ooooooor you can do evil shit in London or Frankfurt, but at least get paid a hell of a lot more money for it.
So what Brussels is left with is a small number of nutbags who are too talentless at bullshitting to hack it in the private sector.
Yeah, can't imagine why they're struggling there. Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
...but at least get paid a hell of a lot more money for it and know that your family won't ever have to want for anything.
Very few people are going to choose public service given a choice like that. It's hard enough to get good people into public service even when your organization lives up to the hype, morally. Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
Shovel a million euros or so at those economists and you'll have them crawling all over each other to work in Brussels.
Après avoir approuvé bruyamment la couverture douteuse du journal, qui le représente avec un casque à pointe (que les journalistes lui ont offert et qui trône maintenant dans son bureau), il a expliqué que « Nicolas Sarkozy a eu raison de dire que l'Europe a beaucoup à apprendre de l'Allemagne », que le modèle allemand était « le meilleur possible, parce qu'ils ont inventé un modèle de croissance sans dette excessive » ; que la meilleure chose que pouvaient faire les Allemands, c'était « de ne pas changer de politique » (donc voter Merkel) ; que « le modèle social européen était mort, parce qu'il ne pouvait se financer que par la dette publique » ; que « l'essentiel de la crise européenne est derrière nous, si chaque pays faisait le nécessaire pour rétablir l'équilibre » ; pour terminer par dire son hostilité aux eurobonds. D'abord, tout cela est historiquement faux, parce que l'Allemagne est aussi endettée que la France, et que ce sont des gouvernements conservateurs qui, en France comme en Italie, en Grèce ou ailleurs (aux Etats-Unis en particulier), ont fabriqué des dettes publiques insurmontables ; c'est aussi contraire à l'action de la BCE, qui a injecté en un mois mille milliards d'euros dans un système bancaire européen en crise de liquidité , pour lui permettre de rembourser ses dettes, installant un système de Ponzi à l'échelle du continent. La BCE n'a pas sauvé l'Union Européenne en décembre. Elle s'est juste sauvée elle-même par le maniement de la planche à billets. Cela ne lui donne pas le droit de tenter d'imposer à l'Union un modèle économique et politique. De fait, ces déclarations sont en violation à son mandat : la Banque Centrale Européenne n'est pas là pour choisir le meilleur dirigeant allemand, ni pour dénoncer la social-démocratie et encore moins pour faire l'apologie du libéralisme. Elle est là pour protéger les épargnants européens des dérives d'une inflation excessive, dans le cadre de la politique économique de l'Union, décidée par les instances de l'Union, et dans le respect des choix politiques de chaque pays.
D'abord, tout cela est historiquement faux, parce que l'Allemagne est aussi endettée que la France, et que ce sont des gouvernements conservateurs qui, en France comme en Italie, en Grèce ou ailleurs (aux Etats-Unis en particulier), ont fabriqué des dettes publiques insurmontables ; c'est aussi contraire à l'action de la BCE, qui a injecté en un mois mille milliards d'euros dans un système bancaire européen en crise de liquidité , pour lui permettre de rembourser ses dettes, installant un système de Ponzi à l'échelle du continent. La BCE n'a pas sauvé l'Union Européenne en décembre. Elle s'est juste sauvée elle-même par le maniement de la planche à billets. Cela ne lui donne pas le droit de tenter d'imposer à l'Union un modèle économique et politique.
De fait, ces déclarations sont en violation à son mandat : la Banque Centrale Européenne n'est pas là pour choisir le meilleur dirigeant allemand, ni pour dénoncer la social-démocratie et encore moins pour faire l'apologie du libéralisme. Elle est là pour protéger les épargnants européens des dérives d'une inflation excessive, dans le cadre de la politique économique de l'Union, décidée par les instances de l'Union, et dans le respect des choix politiques de chaque pays.
After aproving of the doubtful coverage of [Bild], which represents him with a spiked helmet (offered by the journalists and which now presides his office), he explained that «Nicolas Sarkozy is right to say that Europe has much to learn from Germany», that the German model was «the best one possible, because they have invented a model of growth without excessive debt»; that the best thing that the Germans could do was «to not change policy» (thus, to vote Merkel); that «the European social model was dead, because it could not be financed but by public debt»; that «the worst of the European crisis is behind us, if each country does the necessary to restore balance»; to end by stating his hostility to Eurobonds. To begin with, all that is historically false, because Germany is as indebted as France, and it is conservative governments that, in France as in Italy, in Greece or elsewhere (in particular in the USA) have manufactured public debts impossible to overcome; it's also contrary to the action of the ECB, which has injected in a month a trillion Euros into a banking system in a liquidity crisis, to allow it to repay its debts, installing a Ponzi scheme the size of the continent. The ECB hasn't saved the European Union in December. It has just saved itself by means of money printing. This doesn't give it the right to try to impose on the Union a political and economic model. In fact, there statements are a violation of its mandate: the ECB is not there to choose the best German leader, nor to denounce social democracy, and even less to make apology of liberalism. It's there to protect European savers from excessive inflation, in the framework of the Union's economic policy, decided by Union instances, and respecting the political choices of each country..
To begin with, all that is historically false, because Germany is as indebted as France, and it is conservative governments that, in France as in Italy, in Greece or elsewhere (in particular in the USA) have manufactured public debts impossible to overcome; it's also contrary to the action of the ECB, which has injected in a month a trillion Euros into a banking system in a liquidity crisis, to allow it to repay its debts, installing a Ponzi scheme the size of the continent. The ECB hasn't saved the European Union in December. It has just saved itself by means of money printing. This doesn't give it the right to try to impose on the Union a political and economic model.
In fact, there statements are a violation of its mandate: the ECB is not there to choose the best German leader, nor to denounce social democracy, and even less to make apology of liberalism. It's there to protect European savers from excessive inflation, in the framework of the Union's economic policy, decided by Union instances, and respecting the political choices of each country..
Please be patient while this page loads -- it takes several minutes. But it does include, after all, the entire universe. You may see a blank space below, then a gray box. Stick with it. When it's finished loading, prepare to be mesmerized. Click "Start," and then use the slider across the bottom, or the wheel on your mouse, to zoom in -- and in and in and in... or out and out and out... It will take you from the very smallest features postulated by scientists (the strings in string theory) to the very largest (the observable universe.)
Steve Keen has a new post up (with a link to a new paper) about Minksyan (Minskyite?) economics, and how people like me get it wrong. Good for him; debates like this are always productive, and I wish domestic responsibilities weren't keeping me from going to the Berlin conference. ... So, first of all, my basic reaction to discussions about What Minsky Really Meant -- and, similarly, to discussions about What Keynes Really Meant -- is, I Don't Care. I mean, intellectual history is a fine endeavor. But for working economists the reason to read old books is for insight, not authority; if something Keynes or Minsky said helps crystallize an idea in your mind -- and there's a lot of that in both mens' writing -- that's really good, but if where you take the idea is very different from what the great man said somewhere else in his book, so what? This is economics, not Talmudic scholarship. ... I always try to find the simplest representation I can of whatever story I'm trying to tell about the economy. ... Keen doesn't seem to be doing that. His paper contains a number of assertions about what is crucial, without much explanation of why these things are crucial. And I guess I just don't see it.
...
So, first of all, my basic reaction to discussions about What Minsky Really Meant -- and, similarly, to discussions about What Keynes Really Meant -- is, I Don't Care. I mean, intellectual history is a fine endeavor. But for working economists the reason to read old books is for insight, not authority; if something Keynes or Minsky said helps crystallize an idea in your mind -- and there's a lot of that in both mens' writing -- that's really good, but if where you take the idea is very different from what the great man said somewhere else in his book, so what? This is economics, not Talmudic scholarship.
I always try to find the simplest representation I can of whatever story I'm trying to tell about the economy. ...
Keen doesn't seem to be doing that. His paper contains a number of assertions about what is crucial, without much explanation of why these things are crucial. And I guess I just don't see it.
But the point is not what did Minsky really mean in a "Talmudic" sense but just to ask what was Minsky's overlooked insight. In that sense, Krugman is excusing the bastardization of Keynes. What matters is not what Keynes' insight was, but what inspiratin Hicks or Samuelson could get out of it for their own work, and so Keynes is justified by virtue of motivating Hicks and Samuelson to come up with the IS/LM model and similar bastardizations. There are three stories about the euro crisis: the Republican story, the German story, and the truth. -- Paul Krugman
The answer is: Because `Keynesianism' had, after Keynes had met his `long run', accepted the preposterous proposition that one can think of the macroeconomy as if it comprised of millions of clones of a single person; a genetically reproduced Robinson Crusoe whose clones think the same thoughts (plus or minus some random error). (Recall the disastrous Samuelsonian interpretation of Keynes.) And why did they make this concession? In order to put Keynes' thought into a closed mathematical model or, at the textbook level, to capture his `thought' in terms of some appealing, easy to explain geometry. To see that this concession destroyed whatever analytical value Keynes had to offer, consider again the little game I presented (in blue) in Section 2. Suppose that the players are clones and they think identical thoughts, plus or minus a random error. Suddenly, the game loses all its interest: The outcome becomes predicable (each will choose 0 and everyone will gain $1000) and the game's subtle point (that it is impossible even for the smartest player to know what to do; the result depending on the average degree of optimism) vanishes. Similarly, the moment Keynes' thought was imprisoned in these mathematical models, populated by telepathic clones of some Robinson Crusoe, Keynes was doomed to oblivion. ... At that point they latched on to something Keynes had said, misinterpreted it, and used it to concoct versions of their models that simulated some of Keynes' ideas. That `something' that Keynes had said was the famous `inflexibility' of wages. Keynes, it is true, had observed that the price of labour (wages) and some other commodities do not fall during a recession as quickly as economists had expected. One reason was that workers resist wage cuts because their reference point is the wages of their peers and not prices. Based on this observation, New Keynesians introduced into their mathematical models so-called wage rigidities: when some external shock reduced economic activity in the model (external, of course, because these silly models could not explain internally why such a reduction might occur), their Robinson Crusoe clones, for some unexplained by the model reason, would not work for wages below a certain point. Ergo, the New Keynesians concluded with shrieks of pleasure, this explains unemployment during a crisis: wages will not fall sufficiently to restore demand for labour. So, what should happen then? Perhaps, they answered meekly, government must stimulate the economy. ... The New Keynesians have a great deal to answer for, at least here in Europe. By misunderstanding spectacularly Keynes' point about the inflexibility of certain prices and wages, they have aided and abetted misanthropic, austerian policies that would make Keynes cringe. Since the only way they could squeeze some unemployment out of their models, as part of their equilibria, was to introduce wage rigidities, the obvious conclusion is that, if we want to get rid of the unemployment, we better liquidate these rigidities. Is this not what the troika is doing now in Greece, in Ireland, in Portugal? Is this not the pound of flesh that the ECB demands of Spain and Italy? The fact that some of the leading supporters, and indeed executors, of the current bailout-fiscal-adjustment programs that are eating away at the foundations of Europe today are New Keynesians, is not a coincidence. Their models were ripe for the picking by the powers-that-be in Frankfurt, in Berlin, in Brussels.
At that point they latched on to something Keynes had said, misinterpreted it, and used it to concoct versions of their models that simulated some of Keynes' ideas. That `something' that Keynes had said was the famous `inflexibility' of wages. Keynes, it is true, had observed that the price of labour (wages) and some other commodities do not fall during a recession as quickly as economists had expected. One reason was that workers resist wage cuts because their reference point is the wages of their peers and not prices. Based on this observation, New Keynesians introduced into their mathematical models so-called wage rigidities: when some external shock reduced economic activity in the model (external, of course, because these silly models could not explain internally why such a reduction might occur), their Robinson Crusoe clones, for some unexplained by the model reason, would not work for wages below a certain point. Ergo, the New Keynesians concluded with shrieks of pleasure, this explains unemployment during a crisis: wages will not fall sufficiently to restore demand for labour. So, what should happen then? Perhaps, they answered meekly, government must stimulate the economy.
The New Keynesians have a great deal to answer for, at least here in Europe. By misunderstanding spectacularly Keynes' point about the inflexibility of certain prices and wages, they have aided and abetted misanthropic, austerian policies that would make Keynes cringe. Since the only way they could squeeze some unemployment out of their models, as part of their equilibria, was to introduce wage rigidities, the obvious conclusion is that, if we want to get rid of the unemployment, we better liquidate these rigidities. Is this not what the troika is doing now in Greece, in Ireland, in Portugal? Is this not the pound of flesh that the ECB demands of Spain and Italy? The fact that some of the leading supporters, and indeed executors, of the current bailout-fiscal-adjustment programs that are eating away at the foundations of Europe today are New Keynesians, is not a coincidence. Their models were ripe for the picking by the powers-that-be in Frankfurt, in Berlin, in Brussels.
Doubt he'll take any notice.
However it reminds me that "Loanable Funds Fallacy" is a major assumption that makes it hard for people who drop by to understand our economic views here on ET...
@ProfSteveKeen I find it incredible that he can be a Keynesian AND read Minsky, but still have no clue about endogenous money
More than two years have passed since the big debate over the effect of budget deficits on interest rates in a liquidity trap. The original argument of the anti-stimulus types was that large-scale government borrowing would drive up interest rates even in the face of high unemployment, and that this would hurt the economy. At that time the argument was framed in terms of simple crowding out, not solvency. And I argued that the whole thing represented a failure to understand basic macroeconomics. ... But this was as close to a clean test of a proposition as history ever offers. And liquidity preference won, hands down.
But this was as close to a clean test of a proposition as history ever offers. And liquidity preference won, hands down.
Krugman's education fills him with instinctive reactions, that overwhelm even his own later analysis.
"Loanable Funds" is an axiom in mainstream economics, so if you make it through to Professor level, the odds are you've internalised it to the point where it's very hard to question it... now he manages to question it when he stops and focuses on it, but when it's just an axiom for thinking about other things, it's hard to remember to question it. It's such a perfect "just so" story...
And it plays into morality too - if "Loanable Funds" is a fallacy, then the only reason "saving" is virtuous is for individual reasons...
Some personalities (many of them present here on ET) probably would have rebelled against the lack of sense... but I don't think we should underestimate the indoctrination power of years of schooling in economics.
Even when all the evidence compels the more curious characters (e.g. Krugman) to start to look beyond the indoctrination, it still governs many of their instincts.
All of which is to say, perhaps, that if there is hope for humanity, it's not just in Steve Keen's model, but in putting the work in to make that level of inquiry the new mainstream of economics... and even then, it'll take a generation before it really improves things...
Also, the point here appears to be to avoid saying that Spain is being or has been "rescued" or admitting that policy is being dictated from Brussels/Frankfurt, even if it has and it is.
[Spain's Finance Minister Cristobal] Montoro warns that the budget will be "the most austere in [34 years of Spanish] democracy" There are three stories about the euro crisis: the Republican story, the German story, and the truth. -- Paul Krugman
A two-day European Union (EU) summit in Brussels concluded yesterday, announcing plans for an as-needed bailout package for Greece and tougher sanctions against eurozone countries whose deficits exceed European guidelines. The meeting caps weeks of rising tensions between the major European powers over how to deal with the Greek debt crisis. The plan was adopted late Thursday night, incorporating word-for-word a statement written by German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy a few hours earlier. It specifies that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the eurozone countries could jointly bail out Greece, if Greece adopted devastating austerity measures. The plan left maximum ambiguity over support available to Greece, so Greek Prime Minister Giorgios Papandreou could keep citing financial pressures to justify wage, job and pension cuts. However, reports cited estimates of a potential Greek bailout at 22 billion to 30 billion, two-thirds of which would come from the eurozone. Eurozone countries would contribute in proportion to their respective capital vested at the European Central Bank (ECB), which issues the common currency.
The plan was adopted late Thursday night, incorporating word-for-word a statement written by German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy a few hours earlier. It specifies that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the eurozone countries could jointly bail out Greece, if Greece adopted devastating austerity measures.
The plan left maximum ambiguity over support available to Greece, so Greek Prime Minister Giorgios Papandreou could keep citing financial pressures to justify wage, job and pension cuts. However, reports cited estimates of a potential Greek bailout at 22 billion to 30 billion, two-thirds of which would come from the eurozone. Eurozone countries would contribute in proportion to their respective capital vested at the European Central Bank (ECB), which issues the common currency.
Zbigniew Siemiatowski confirmed to Gazeta Wyborcza, a Polish newspaper, that prosecutors had charged him as part of their long-running investigation into a secret detention centre in eastern Poland used by the CIA from 2002 to 2003 for suspects in transit to Guantanamo Bay, but said he refused to co-operate. "While in the prosecutor's office I refused to answer questions and I shall continue to do so at every stage of the proceedings, including in court," Mr Siemiatowski told the paper. Investigators allege the spy boss exceeded his powers and breached international law through the use of "unlawful deprivation of liberty" and "corporal punishment" against prisoners of war. A spokesman for the prosecutor's office refused to confirm the charges owing to state secrecy.
Zbigniew Siemiatowski confirmed to Gazeta Wyborcza, a Polish newspaper, that prosecutors had charged him as part of their long-running investigation into a secret detention centre in eastern Poland used by the CIA from 2002 to 2003 for suspects in transit to Guantanamo Bay, but said he refused to co-operate.
"While in the prosecutor's office I refused to answer questions and I shall continue to do so at every stage of the proceedings, including in court," Mr Siemiatowski told the paper.
Investigators allege the spy boss exceeded his powers and breached international law through the use of "unlawful deprivation of liberty" and "corporal punishment" against prisoners of war.
A spokesman for the prosecutor's office refused to confirm the charges owing to state secrecy.
Media seem to be lax in that the North Sea is large enough to absorb this, forgetting that the damn rig is installed in only 70 (90?) meter water.
Evacuations are not only on the rig itself, but adjacent rigs, shutting them down as well, affecting about 3.5% of UK gas and 5% of UK oil in total.
If it comes to being untenable to drop the cement from the rig, it will take some six months to bore from another rig to the side.
the difference between the damage here and the Gulf spill is that these are very shallow waters, compared to very deep waters in the Gulf. There will likely be all manner of damage to fish, fowl and coral. Plus more pressure on fossil prices for the blind humans.
When i drily discuss the real cost of externalities, this is one that hurts. some of my best friends live in the sea.
building a society on fossil fuels is poison, and mad. "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
Hmm, like Ixtoc I? And the deepwater horizon blowout also quickly led to contamination of shallow coastal waters with all manner of damage to fish, fowl and coral. There are three stories about the euro crisis: the Republican story, the German story, and the truth. -- Paul Krugman
Guess i should have said this one is likely to be as bad, and much closer to Yurpeen fisheries. At least they evacuated before 167 people were killed on Piper Alpha.
All the companies are comparably bad, this one is Total. "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
Total's stock dropped more than 6% on the Paris Xchange today, reminding stockbrokers of externalities for a few minutes.
Since the explosion hasn't happened yet, it's not visual enough to make global news.
Humans will be inured to the damages when the next one blows in Malaysia or Brazil again. I guess until the stock in Sushi Joe's tanks.
OTOH, Norwegian environmental groups are taking this one seriously. Especially if it takes months to get it capped. "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
(But I've been working, not cruising the internets.) Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
According to reports, the gas cloud surrounding the platform and accompanying sheen contains between two and 23 tonnes of gas condensate, measuring six nautical miles in length.
During the drilling of Elgin/Franklin in 2003, world records for pressure and temperature were broken as engineers found reservoir pressures between 600 and 1100 bar and temperatures reaching 200 degree Celsius. By comparison, the Deepwater Horizon blowout occurred at 896 bar. The field on which the platform is located was discovered in 1991. Bellona has learned that there have been incidents at the well that have veered dangerously close to accidents, including a serious incident in 2005. Other grave safety shortcomings have also been revealed in this field. Total was, in fact, considering killing the well when the problems began over the weekend.
Bellona has learned that there have been incidents at the well that have veered dangerously close to accidents, including a serious incident in 2005. Other grave safety shortcomings have also been revealed in this field.
Total was, in fact, considering killing the well when the problems began over the weekend.
building a society on fossil fuels is poison, and mad.
word... It's a fine line between homage, parody, and consumer opportunism. Jess Walter
60 centimeters does not compare favorably to the 10 meters TEPCO reported covering the place where the already melted down fuel was supposed to be just last December.
Leaks were discovered which go to the surface and the sea.
Tell me again why we should be debating a half-cent Feed-In Tariff change, or the end of wind in Spain?
I am such a fan of the wisdom exhaled by this civilization. "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
because endoscope means device to look within. There are three stories about the euro crisis: the Republican story, the German story, and the truth. -- Paul Krugman
But in USian english, an endoscope is used to look into the body, and a boroscope is used to look into gearboxes and reactors and mechanical shit. "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
Because nonrenewable resource constraints mean we have to learn to live within our means and that means monetary austerity and no investment in new technology. Just ask Merkel, or any of a number of self-described environmental economists. There are three stories about the euro crisis: the Republican story, the German story, and the truth. -- Paul Krugman
Not so much exhaled as farted. There are three stories about the euro crisis: the Republican story, the German story, and the truth. -- Paul Krugman
because they Totally own the joint. shit and shaboodle...
but they do need our consent, and enough of these we'll withhold it in enough numbers to matter.
meanwhile back at the ranch, it's BAU. It's a fine line between homage, parody, and consumer opportunism. Jess Walter
Large portions of Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania shivered through a hard freeze (temperatures below 28°F ) this morning, and cold temperatures will cause widespread damage to flowering plants fooled into blooming by last week's unprecedented "Summer in March" heat wave. Growers of apples, pears, peaches, nectarines, plums, and cherries worked during the night and early morning to minimize the damage by running large fans and propane heaters in their orchards in an attempts to keep temperatures a few degrees warmer.
To quote Herr Drew von Tallahassee, "Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!" Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
but this civilization still doubts there are signs. "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
shrug that's the way it goes. Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
March. The normal high is 74F. Even granting that we're closing in on April, that's still a normal of 80F that we're blowing past.
By July it's gonna be fucking 160F. Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
Getting grim here in the Southwest. Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
We're several inches below normal here. We've had about 10 inches of precipitation so far.
Usual caveat applies: We've been going through a dry few years, and the South has always been prone to ridiculous swings in rainfall. Don't know what historical temperature swings look like, but it seems to be getting solidly hotter year after year. Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
The serious underlying problem is drought. (Repeat...)
my guess is we'll broil all summer, though.
by Migeru - Jun 15 69 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 17 20 comments
by Katrin - Jun 12 88 comments
by Jerome a Paris - Jun 9 68 comments
by DoDo - Jun 9 22 comments
by Zwackus - Jun 11 64 comments
by Metatone - Jun 8 4 comments
by Ted Welch - Jun 3 1 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 1720 comments
by Migeru - Jun 1569 comments
by Katrin - Jun 1288 comments
by DoDo - Jun 1126 comments
by Zwackus - Jun 1164 comments
by Jerome a Paris - Jun 968 comments
by DoDo - Jun 922 comments
by Metatone - Jun 84 comments
by DoDo - Jun 671 comments
by DoDo - Jun 418 comments
by Ted Welch - Jun 31 comment
by gmoke - Jun 211 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 3113 comments
by A swedish kind of death - May 3113 comments
by ceebs - May 2927 comments
by ARGeezer - May 2915 comments
by Zwackus - May 271 comment
by DoDo - May 2631 comments
by DoDo - May 2346 comments
by Metatone - May 1490 comments