The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
by dvx Mon Apr 23rd, 2012 at 11:27:58 AM EST
The fact is that what we're experiencing right now is a top-down disaster. -Paul Krugman
But at least I'll never mainline. You can't be me, I'm taken
It was unpleasant, but a long way from the worst I've had. (And certainly better than the occasional unbearable tooth ache I've had for the last few months.)
Count me in as one who prefers the needle and the numbing. I almost fell to the floor the first time the German dentist asked if I wanted the anesthetic, as if there were any other way to have dentistry. I answered something like "well, I don't know how you're going to work on my teeth if I'm biting on a frickin' bullet." 'tis strange I should be old and neither wise nor valiant. From "The Maid's Tragedy" by Beaumont & Fletcher
I was supposed to have jury duty today, but they cancelled the trial. I should have just gone back to bed....
We adore our dentists (father, daughter.) They live in our little neighborhood here in Bischofswiesen and their office is also in the neighborhood. We have their private numbers in case of emergencies. This is SO different from my USA experience, even though there is a dentist in Little Rock who's one of the best dentists in the world, I'm certain. 'tis strange I should be old and neither wise nor valiant. From "The Maid's Tragedy" by Beaumont & Fletcher
It must be dentistry day on ET.
I'm glad i still have some teeth. "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
But at least I'll never mainline either.
And, in Spanish only... The Socialists call on the citizenry to "defend themselves" against the government. guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
The Socialists call on the citizenry to "defend themselves" against the government.
Coming to a theater near you. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wp4O7v5320
I suspect that it is one of the defining issues that define left and right nowadays. If it's true that "mainstream" right wingers now openly own islamophobic sentiments, and if Sarkozy chooses this as his battlefield over the next ten days, there are dark days ahead.
But I also suspect that this will amplify Hollande's winning margin, and singularly complicate things for the UMP in the legislatives. Reaping the whirlwind. It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
If it were not for a little meeting in Paris later this week I'd probably be in Bamberg or Munich today, but I can wait. keep to the Fen Causeway
The Bavarian Rheinheitsgebot law is 23/4/1516 keep to the Fen Causeway
Governments across Europe have lost power in the past two years as German Chancellor Angela Merkel pushes for austerity to prevent the euro area from breaking up. Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte will meet his Cabinet today to discuss a strategy for passing a budget that meets European Union targets. Early elections will probably be called after the Freedom Party withdrew its support for the minority government on April 21. ... The Czech coalition broke up over Cabinet personnel decisions and trimming the deficit as Necas's 20-month-old administration prepares tax increases and a cut in spending on pensions to bring the fiscal gap to within the EU limit of 3 percent of gross domestic product next year. The fiscal goals have attracted investors into Czech bonds, pushing the government's borrowing costs to a record low.
Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte will meet his Cabinet today to discuss a strategy for passing a budget that meets European Union targets. Early elections will probably be called after the Freedom Party withdrew its support for the minority government on April 21.
...
The Czech coalition broke up over Cabinet personnel decisions and trimming the deficit as Necas's 20-month-old administration prepares tax increases and a cut in spending on pensions to bring the fiscal gap to within the EU limit of 3 percent of gross domestic product next year. The fiscal goals have attracted investors into Czech bonds, pushing the government's borrowing costs to a record low.
This looks like a bombshell announcement to me (I'm not aware of the internal politics behind the announcement, but I'm presuming that Robert Darnton's fingerprints are all over it). Discuss.We write to communicate an untenable situation facing the Harvard Library. ... The Faculty Advisory Council to the Library, representing university faculty in all schools and in consultation with the Harvard Library leadership, reached this conclusion: major periodical subscriptions, especially to electronic journals published by historically key providers, cannot be sustained: continuing these subscriptions on their current footing is financially untenable. ...
We write to communicate an untenable situation facing the Harvard Library. ... The Faculty Advisory Council to the Library, representing university faculty in all schools and in consultation with the Harvard Library leadership, reached this conclusion: major periodical subscriptions, especially to electronic journals published by historically key providers, cannot be sustained: continuing these subscriptions on their current footing is financially untenable. ...
The University of Florida announced this past week that it was dropping its computer science department, which will allow it to save about $1.7 million. The school is eliminating all funding for teaching assistants in computer science, cutting the graduate and research programs entirely, and moving the tattered remnants into other departments. Meanwhile, the athletic budget for the current year is $99 million, an increase of more than $2 million from last year. The increase alone would more than offset the savings supposedly gained by cutting computer science.
Meanwhile, the athletic budget for the current year is $99 million, an increase of more than $2 million from last year. The increase alone would more than offset the savings supposedly gained by cutting computer science.
Anyway, I responded below. I'm afraid Forbes bs'ed you guys on this one. Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
A few points:
(1) These are two separate budgets. Money isn't taken from the GR fund and put in the proprietary athletic fund. Especially not at a massive powerhouse football school like UF.
(2) Computer science is not being eliminated at UF. It's being merged into the engineering school.
(3) The Gators make obscene amounts of money on their athletics department -- so much so that they're a net contributor to the school's general revenue fund. The entire Dept of Athletics has a budget of $99m. UF makes a lot more than that on football alone via ticket sales and merchandise (and that's not getting into Booster cash).
The university just raised ticket prices -- not easy for a school whose football team (the main money-maker) is garbage right now -- and threw another $6m into the general revenue fund. They're thrown something like $60m into the general revenue fund over the last few decades.
The athletic department is a huge benefit to UF.
Note the source here: Forbes, whose darling governor is the one that slashed the CS budget. People should be ripping on Rick Scott for slashing the university budgets, not at the athletic department. There are plenty of good examples of wasteful athletic departments, but UF's ain't one of them. Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
Meanwhile, just two days ago, Florida governor Rick Scott approved the creation of a brand-new public university, Florida Polytechnic University, to be located near the city of Tampa. In an unintentionally ironic statement, Gov. Scott said"At a time when the number of graduates of Florida's universities in the STEM [science, technology, engineering, and mathematics] fields is not projected to meet workforce needs, the establishment of Florida Polytechnic University will help us move the needle in the right direction."Heads up, Gov. Scott: no one is going to believe that you're supporting technical education when your flagship university is eliminating its Computer Science Department. Since cutting support for universities seems to be a major agenda item for you and the legislature, why stop at 30%? With just a bit more cutting, you could get rid of those annoying universities entirely. Let the rest of the country worry about higher education! Florida can focus on orange groves and golf courses. Oh, and football.
"At a time when the number of graduates of Florida's universities in the STEM [science, technology, engineering, and mathematics] fields is not projected to meet workforce needs, the establishment of Florida Polytechnic University will help us move the needle in the right direction."
Also, don't blame us for the golf courses. The idiot Northerners and Lesser Southerners (ex: Alabamans) are the ones who like that crap.
As for orange groves and football, look, we have comparative advantages in both.
Also, too, Salzberg is a bitter Marylander. Stupid turtles can't balance their books, because their fanbase sucks. Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
Let me also point out that the very blog Forbes cites for its weasel paragraph has noted that Forbes is full of shit and places the blame where it's deserved. Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
Let me start by asking, what is your first association when somebody talks to you about 'the economy'? Is the image you get: factories working, supermarkets full of people, busy Wall St., or, what? For today's purpose, I would like you to think of the economic system, first, as a web of contracts, contracts and understandings among agents in the economy. Now, this is a web of contracts where, any given day, some of them are fulfilled, expired, others are renewed, the web is constantly renewed. The problem is, in this renewal of the web of contracts, the whole web can develop instability. The instabilities come in different sizes, if you want. So, we have first, of course, just an individual isolated default. It's taken care of, the law takes care of it and so on, it happens all the time. Some promises are broken. But if some promise is broken in the web, there's at any given time a probability that that will cause somebody else to default. So, in a reasonably robust credit system these chains of defaults will be very short. But the web can develop into a state where one default will trigger an avalanche of defaults and those avalanches differ in size, taking down as it were bigger or smaller portions of the web. You can think of some loose analogies of phenomena that have a similar dynamic structure, for example power grid blackouts may wipe out all the north eastern states or just a local community, or Per Bak's famous sandpiles. You may remember that mental experiment: you have sand running at a constant rate onto a pile and the pile keeps growing and at intervals, random intervals, you get avalanches in the pile and these differ in size and you have a given size distribution, and so on. So this is true of default avalanches in an economy as well, but a highly fragile economy, a Minsky-fragile system, has the possibility of crashing altogether.
Now, this is a web of contracts where, any given day, some of them are fulfilled, expired, others are renewed, the web is constantly renewed. The problem is, in this renewal of the web of contracts, the whole web can develop instability. The instabilities come in different sizes, if you want. So, we have first, of course, just an individual isolated default. It's taken care of, the law takes care of it and so on, it happens all the time. Some promises are broken. But if some promise is broken in the web, there's at any given time a probability that that will cause somebody else to default. So, in a reasonably robust credit system these chains of defaults will be very short. But the web can develop into a state where one default will trigger an avalanche of defaults and those avalanches differ in size, taking down as it were bigger or smaller portions of the web.
You can think of some loose analogies of phenomena that have a similar dynamic structure, for example power grid blackouts may wipe out all the north eastern states or just a local community, or Per Bak's famous sandpiles. You may remember that mental experiment: you have sand running at a constant rate onto a pile and the pile keeps growing and at intervals, random intervals, you get avalanches in the pile and these differ in size and you have a given size distribution, and so on. So this is true of default avalanches in an economy as well, but a highly fragile economy, a Minsky-fragile system, has the possibility of crashing altogether.
In a new CEPR Policy Insight, Axel Leijonhufvud argues that theories that assume that the economy is a stable general equilibrium system, albeit beset with some frictions and imperfections, do not hold true in general and that we need a new paradigm of economic thought.
The financial crisis and the ensuing recession have prompted reappraisals of the state of macroeconomic theory. This policy insight argues that we have to think of an economy as an "open system" in the ontological sense and adapt out methods to the nature of an economy - to change how we do economics.
Rational expectations envisage the economy as a train travelling through a Markovian switching yard. Everybody on board! All with the same mental baggage neatly packed. At predetermined, constant intervals the train switches - clickety-clack - onto a new track chosen by a draw from a fair lottery. The tracks have been laid once and for all (and there are no derailments). Not necessarily the most profound image of the human condition! Yet, giving up this conception of the nature of an economy would force us to modify our methods. Accepting that the future cannot be known with certainty, even as a probability distribution, means recognising that we are dealing with an open system. And then the usefulness of many tools of the trade comes into doubt. Agents in such a system have to adapt15 to events the probability of which they had not estimated correctly - or which they may not even have imagined. Obviously, intertemporal optimisation cannot then be a "true" representation of behaviour. The problem is that treating behaviour as adaptive opens the door to all sorts of non-linear behaviour and one would not like to see macro theory reduced to little else than rummaging in the toy box of complex system dynamics. Our accustomed analytical techniques may still have their uses in studying the open system. In periods of prolonged tranquillity, agents are apt to pay attention to the rates of intertemporal substitution that they see themselves as facing and to do so for some distance into the future. This will tend to dampen the economy's tendency to fluctuate. It will at least suppress high-frequency oscillations. This is captured by intertemporal optimisation models which may thus provide approximations of observed behaviour. In making such use of them, however, we had better remember that transversality conditions at an infinite time horizon are not to be taken seriously. Every bubble that ever burst proves transversality false. So, how far to trust these models becomes a question of judgment - and not an easy one.
Agents in such a system have to adapt15 to events the probability of which they had not estimated correctly - or which they may not even have imagined. Obviously, intertemporal optimisation cannot then be a "true" representation of behaviour. The problem is that treating behaviour as adaptive opens the door to all sorts of non-linear behaviour and one would not like to see macro theory reduced to little else than rummaging in the toy box of complex system dynamics.
Our accustomed analytical techniques may still have their uses in studying the open system. In periods of prolonged tranquillity, agents are apt to pay attention to the rates of intertemporal substitution that they see themselves as facing and to do so for some distance into the future. This will tend to dampen the economy's tendency to fluctuate. It will at least suppress high-frequency oscillations. This is captured by intertemporal optimisation models which may thus provide approximations of observed behaviour. In making such use of them, however, we had better remember that transversality conditions at an infinite time horizon are not to be taken seriously. Every bubble that ever burst proves transversality false. So, how far to trust these models becomes a question of judgment - and not an easy one.
Because if it were reasonable, it would have solved the problem before it turned into a serious depression. It is not at all difficult, from a technical perspective, to prevent depressions. All it requires is that you fuck over some creditors in a controlled manner before matters come to a head in a general collapse of the credit system.
- Jake If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.
Of course, when he speaks of the collapse of the reasonable centre, it must be remembered that the reason the quote-unquote "reasonable" centre collapses in a major depression is that it is not, in fact, reasonable. And has not been for quite some time.
HA!
Good one. Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
One of the guests took me aside and told me that two musicians would be arriving at 8.30, as a birthday surprise. BH was somewhat nonplussed when Rhoslan turned up with his violin case, claiming to be a "friend of Michel" (Russian mafia hit man?). He claimed that five more musicians and a sound system were on the way. In the end, Sergei turned up with his guitar, they tuned up and struck up. They played a variety of styles, but the overall effect was a Django Rheinhart / Stéphane Grappelli thing. Ties and collars were loosened, and the rythm of drinking adjusted to that of the musicians (no ethnic stereotyping intended, but you all know what I mean).
At around 11, there was a knock on the door, I opened to a vaguely familiar face, so I pulled him inside and kissed him on both cheeks. As you do. It turned out to be the neighbour from upstairs, come to complain about the noise. He ended up staying till after midnight.
Not bad for a Monday night. It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
by JakeS - May 15 7 comments
by Metatone - May 14 85 comments
by ARGeezer - May 16 13 comments
by Nomad - May 10 14 comments
by gmoke - May 17 1 comment
by DoDo - May 20 2 comments
by DoDo - May 12 10 comments
by Migeru - May 6 100 comments
by DoDo - May 202 comments
by gmoke - May 171 comment
by ARGeezer - May 1613 comments
by JakeS - May 157 comments
by Metatone - May 1485 comments
by DoDo - May 1210 comments
by Nomad - May 1014 comments
by Migeru - May 78 comments
by marco - May 782 comments
by Migeru - May 6100 comments
by Ted Welch - May 35 comments
by afew - May 340 comments
by ceebs - May 26 comments
by gmoke - Apr 301 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 3067 comments
by joelado - Apr 2954 comments
by Metatone - Apr 2854 comments
by ATinNM - Apr 275 comments
by ceebs - Apr 265 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2686 comments