The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
by dvx Fri Jul 20th, 2012 at 11:16:28 AM EST
Slovenia's parliament postponed voting on reforms the government says are crucial for securing its financial stability, taking the country one step closer to seeking an international bailout. Lawmakers had been due to vote on Friday on one rule to enforce balanced budgets in coming years, and on another on setting up a state holding firm to take over bad loans in the state banking sector. ... The yield on Slovenia's 11-year sovereign bond reached 5.5 percent on Friday, according to Reuters data, above most of its euro zone peers but still well below equivalent debt yields for Spain, the other single currency state flirting with a full-blown bailout.
Lawmakers had been due to vote on Friday on one rule to enforce balanced budgets in coming years, and on another on setting up a state holding firm to take over bad loans in the state banking sector.
...
The yield on Slovenia's 11-year sovereign bond reached 5.5 percent on Friday, according to Reuters data, above most of its euro zone peers but still well below equivalent debt yields for Spain, the other single currency state flirting with a full-blown bailout.
Spain's risk premium shot to a new record high on Friday after officials in Valencia formally asked the central government for funds to help pay the region's surmounting bills, including the high prices of prescription drugs. ... Following Friday's weekly Cabinet meeting, Finance Minister Cristóbal Montoro announced that the government was cutting its economic growth forecasts for 2012 and 2013 based on the rise in interest rates Spain will have to pay for its debt, hikes in Social Security costs and increases in pensions. The minister said that public spending could rise by as much as 9.2 percent in 2013. Montoro said at first that he wasn't aware that Valencia government officials had announced about an hour earlier that they would be the first region to formally tap into the Regional Liquidity Fund (FLA), a system that was created just over a week ago which will allow cash-strapped regions to access financing but under stringent guidelines.
Following Friday's weekly Cabinet meeting, Finance Minister Cristóbal Montoro announced that the government was cutting its economic growth forecasts for 2012 and 2013 based on the rise in interest rates Spain will have to pay for its debt, hikes in Social Security costs and increases in pensions. The minister said that public spending could rise by as much as 9.2 percent in 2013.
Montoro said at first that he wasn't aware that Valencia government officials had announced about an hour earlier that they would be the first region to formally tap into the Regional Liquidity Fund (FLA), a system that was created just over a week ago which will allow cash-strapped regions to access financing but under stringent guidelines.
Some economists view the Eurozone crisis as driven by the deteriorating competitiveness of periphery countries (see Chen et al. 2012). Specifically, some analysts suggest that low competitiveness in the south is driven by exceptional growth of unit labour costs (Dadush and Stancil 2011). According to this view, increases of wage costs adjusted for productivity differences, or in short adjusted wage costs, made the exports of these countries uncompetitive. Policy prescriptions to improve competitiveness that are based on this view have therefore focused on how to regain lost export market shares (see, for example, Dadush and Wyne 2012). Structural reforms may help but they take time.1 In the shorter term, increasing market shares can be achieved by increasing price competitiveness. Typically this is done by depreciating the currency. Since Eurozone countries cannot devalue their currency, policymakers should instead try to restore competitiveness through internal devaluation, i.e. by reducing adjusted wage costs.2 One estimate for Greece, for example, is that adjusted wage costs need to be reduced by 31%, effectively reaching the level of Turkey (Sinn, 2012). ... A basic premise underpinning these prescriptions is that exporters from Eurozone crisis countries underperformed. In this article we argue that loss of export competitiveness is likely to be the main determinant of growing current account deficits only for France.3 In the Southern EZ countries current account deficits reflected an excessive increase in imports. In the run-up to the crisis, exporters from these countries could perform well on the international markets despite the rise in their countries' adjusted wage costs, because the bulk of the rise in wage costs occurred in the non-traded sector.
Policy prescriptions to improve competitiveness that are based on this view have therefore focused on how to regain lost export market shares (see, for example, Dadush and Wyne 2012). Structural reforms may help but they take time.1 In the shorter term, increasing market shares can be achieved by increasing price competitiveness. Typically this is done by depreciating the currency. Since Eurozone countries cannot devalue their currency, policymakers should instead try to restore competitiveness through internal devaluation, i.e. by reducing adjusted wage costs.2 One estimate for Greece, for example, is that adjusted wage costs need to be reduced by 31%, effectively reaching the level of Turkey (Sinn, 2012).
A basic premise underpinning these prescriptions is that exporters from Eurozone crisis countries underperformed. In this article we argue that loss of export competitiveness is likely to be the main determinant of growing current account deficits only for France.3 In the Southern EZ countries current account deficits reflected an excessive increase in imports. In the run-up to the crisis, exporters from these countries could perform well on the international markets despite the rise in their countries' adjusted wage costs, because the bulk of the rise in wage costs occurred in the non-traded sector.
Matt writes:And crucially the key test a purported effort to provide microfoundations for gravity must pass is that it has to explain gravity well. The trend in economics since the Lucas Critique seems to be the reverse. If a theory lacks adequate microfoundations, it's rejected out of hand while you get a lot of wriggle room in terms of accounting for the data properly... ... Gravity is different from macroeconomics in several ways. One way is that we don't actually know if there is any phenomenon "underlying" gravity. Gravity might not be explainable in terms of any broader, more general phenomenon. But we know for a fact that macroeconomics is the result of a whole bunch of little economic decisions by individuals and companies. This, not the Lucas Critique, is the real reason we look for microfoundations for macroeconomics. Now, maybe some macroeconomic phenomena don't have microfoundations; maybe they are emergent. But we don't know that yet. ... Once again, let me reiterate that the big problem with "microfounded" macro, as I see it, is that the "microfoundations" are bad: not credible, and generally not consistent with anything microeconomists have actually found. Bad microfoundations are worse than none at all.
And crucially the key test a purported effort to provide microfoundations for gravity must pass is that it has to explain gravity well. The trend in economics since the Lucas Critique seems to be the reverse. If a theory lacks adequate microfoundations, it's rejected out of hand while you get a lot of wriggle room in terms of accounting for the data properly...
Gravity is different from macroeconomics in several ways. One way is that we don't actually know if there is any phenomenon "underlying" gravity. Gravity might not be explainable in terms of any broader, more general phenomenon. But we know for a fact that macroeconomics is the result of a whole bunch of little economic decisions by individuals and companies. This, not the Lucas Critique, is the real reason we look for microfoundations for macroeconomics. Now, maybe some macroeconomic phenomena don't have microfoundations; maybe they are emergent. But we don't know that yet.
Once again, let me reiterate that the big problem with "microfounded" macro, as I see it, is that the "microfoundations" are bad: not credible, and generally not consistent with anything microeconomists have actually found. Bad microfoundations are worse than none at all.
Aside from discovering a couple of good pubs I'd not been to before, it was yet more evidence for Helen's Law which reads "Popular pubs may sell bad beer, but no pub selling good beer is unpopular".
There were a couple of pubs I went to that were deserted, yet seemed to have considerable potential, yet neither had any beer worth drinking. People blame supermarkets for selling cheap booze, but surely that should suggest that pubs offer products which can't be found in supermarkets, such as decent real ale. You can get Stella, fosters, Guinness etc perfectly well in a supermarket, but you can't get a decent real ale. keep to the Fen Causeway
Do you blog on European issues & cannot be in Brussels for #cy2012eublogs? Tweet me if interested in joining one of the G+ hangouts! RT plz
On 26 July the Cyprus Presidency of the Council of the European Union will organise an event in Brussels bringing together European bloggers. Starting from today those wishing to participate may register for the event.
I'm going to--of course--ignore the prequels. There's a great SMBC comic exploring the geopolitical consequences of having Superman turn a crank to provide an unlimited source of energy. We could imagine Yoda using the Force to run a similar generator. But how much power could he really supply?
I'm going to--of course--ignore the prequels.
There's a great SMBC comic exploring the geopolitical consequences of having Superman turn a crank to provide an unlimited source of energy. We could imagine Yoda using the Force to run a similar generator. But how much power could he really supply?
Brazil were running rings around the GB team, it was beyond awful. At least it doesn't hurt in the way that watching England be clueless hurts, but it's distressing to discover that, despite years of diminished expectations, I still had hopes of something better keep to the Fen Causeway
Or the cycling! Boardman/Froome roolz OK! It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
by JakeS - May 15 7 comments
by ARGeezer - May 16 10 comments
by Nomad - May 10 14 comments
by Metatone - May 14 85 comments
by gmoke - May 17
by DoDo - May 12 10 comments
by Migeru - May 6 100 comments
by Migeru - May 7 8 comments
by ARGeezer - May 1610 comments
by JakeS - May 157 comments
by Metatone - May 1485 comments
by DoDo - May 1210 comments
by Nomad - May 1014 comments
by Migeru - May 78 comments
by marco - May 782 comments
by Migeru - May 6100 comments
by Ted Welch - May 35 comments
by afew - May 340 comments
by ceebs - May 26 comments
by gmoke - Apr 301 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 3067 comments
by joelado - Apr 2954 comments
by Metatone - Apr 2854 comments
by ATinNM - Apr 275 comments
by ceebs - Apr 265 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2686 comments
by In Wales - Apr 2136 comments