The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
by dvx Thu Jan 3rd, 2013 at 12:33:26 PM EST
Vatican Is 'Cash Only' As Bank Of Italy Blocks Electronic Payments Over Money Laundering Concerns
VATICAN CITY -- It's "cash only" now for tourists at the Vatican wanting to pay for museum tickets, souvenirs and other services after Italy's central bank decided to block electronic payments, including credit cards, at the tiny city-state. Deutsche Bank Italia, which for some 15 years had provided the Vatican with electronic payment services, said Thursday that the Bank of Italy had pulled its authorization to do so after Dec. 31. The Corriere della Sera newspaper reported that the Italian central bank took the action because the Holy See has not yet fully complied with European Union safeguards against money laundering. That means Italian banks are not authorized to operate within the Vatican, which is in the process of improving its mechanisms to combat laundering.
VATICAN CITY -- It's "cash only" now for tourists at the Vatican wanting to pay for museum tickets, souvenirs and other services after Italy's central bank decided to block electronic payments, including credit cards, at the tiny city-state.
Deutsche Bank Italia, which for some 15 years had provided the Vatican with electronic payment services, said Thursday that the Bank of Italy had pulled its authorization to do so after Dec. 31.
The Corriere della Sera newspaper reported that the Italian central bank took the action because the Holy See has not yet fully complied with European Union safeguards against money laundering. That means Italian banks are not authorized to operate within the Vatican, which is in the process of improving its mechanisms to combat laundering.
Maybe it's because I'm a Londoner - that I moved to Nice.
When Steven Vicinanza got a letter in the mail earlier this year informing him that he needed to pay $1,000 per employee for a license to some "distributed computer architecture" patents, he didn't quite believe it at first. The letter seemed to be saying anyone using a modern office scanner to scan documents to e-mail would have to pay--which is to say, just about any business, period.
There is regular commentary here that seeks to argue that Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) is flawed, bereft or worse because apparently it avoids any discussion of the natural environment. This apparently arises from the inherent conclusion in MMT that growth in aggregate demand (and real GDP) is required to maintain high levels of employment, which are considered both economically and socially desirable. This is the first part of a two-part blog on this topic. We will see that MMT is highly sympathetic to the challenges posed by anthropogenic global warming (a catch-all term) and central policy indications that follow from an understanding of MMT (for example, the superiority of employment buffer stocks) lead to an understanding of how MMT is a green paradigm as opposed to mainstream (neo-liberal) economics and much of Post Keynesian thinking, the latter which relies on generalised expansion as the solution to entrenched unemployment. We conclude that those who seek to dismiss MMT because it doesn't satisfy their particular pet solution to climate change issues have probably not read some of the earlier MMT literature nor understood fully what is required to develop and disseminate a new way of thinking about the economy. Further, MMT is not a theory about everything! What we will see is that when MMT advocates economic growth it does so with a very different view of what that economic growth might be comprised of and driven. ... But the point is that the early MMT work clearly recognised that economic growth and environment decay are intrinsically linked and an answer to the latter required a different approach than that offered by the mainstream economists (more about which later). ... These issues have occupied our research group for the last 15 years or so. What we argue is that full employment and the continuity and health of the social settlement are necessary conditions for achieving economic and social sustainability, which is the overarching aim. However, they are not sufficient conditions. Without a balance being achieved between these elements and the natural (physical) environment, the macroeconomic situation is not sustainable. Thus, a forward-looking, progressive macroeconomics - such as Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) - requires economic activity to be in balance with the natural environment. There are two aspects of this concept of `sustainability' that are relevant to macroeconomic policy design: (a) the level of production (and consumption) must be consistent with the demands of the physical environment; and (b) locally- or community-based production should be encouraged.
...
But the point is that the early MMT work clearly recognised that economic growth and environment decay are intrinsically linked and an answer to the latter required a different approach than that offered by the mainstream economists (more about which later).
These issues have occupied our research group for the last 15 years or so. What we argue is that full employment and the continuity and health of the social settlement are necessary conditions for achieving economic and social sustainability, which is the overarching aim.
However, they are not sufficient conditions. Without a balance being achieved between these elements and the natural (physical) environment, the macroeconomic situation is not sustainable.
Thus, a forward-looking, progressive macroeconomics - such as Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) - requires economic activity to be in balance with the natural environment. There are two aspects of this concept of `sustainability' that are relevant to macroeconomic policy design: (a) the level of production (and consumption) must be consistent with the demands of the physical environment; and (b) locally- or community-based production should be encouraged.
I think the key issue preventing MMT and Environmental Economics from being seen as compatible (which I think they ultimately are) is that it is extremely easy for Environmental Economics to fall into the position that what we need is thermodynamic accounting and that the fiat money system, which is by and large conflated with the fractional reserve banking system, is unable to properly incorporate thermodynamic accounting because money values are arbitrary (fiat). Therefore, a theromodynamic standard (energy, thermodynamic free energy, entropy, ore some similar quantity) for money is often proposed as the solution to all our economic woes. Anyone who takes MMT seriously will recognise that an energy standard is just as deflationary in terms of employment as a gold standard or any other commodity standard. The resolution of the dilemma is to point out that employment does not need to mean high-environmental-impact employment. Clearly employing people in personal services has a much lower environmental impact than employing the same people in resource extraction, energy-intensive manufacturing, etc. And the economy can "grow in nominal terms' while not growing in environmental impact by an adjustment in the mix of goods and services consumed, in the direction of lower resource intensity goods and services. A lot of people come into Environmental Economics from engineering or natural science, and such a background predisposes one against social convention ("fiat" money, nominal accounting) and for objective measures (real accounting, hence commodity money, gold standards, and thermodynamic money standards). "Money as a thing" is one of the most engrained concepts in our culture and it dovetails with the engineer/scientist tendency to prefer a commodity standard for money. At present, monetary austerity is being used as an argument for environmental business as usual ("we cannot afford the investment needed to transition to a green energy economy"). This is a conceptual mistake of mixing resource austerity with money austerity, but if you believe money should map resources, you can't break the link between money austerity and resource austerity. The fact is that MMT through "functional finance" provides a way to justify that yes, we do (if only we have the political will) have the money to mobilize the resources necessary for the massive investment involved in a wholesale transition to a green energy future. This is akin to Keynes' quip that "Thus we are so sensible, have schooled ourselves to so close a semblance of prudent financiers, taking careful thought before we add to the 'financial' burdens of posterity by building them houses to live in, that we have no such easy escape from the sufferings of unemployment". We may in fact paraphrase Keynes: "Thus we are so sensible taking careful thought before we add to the financial burdens of posterity by building them windfarms to power their society, that we have no escape from the sufferings of environmental destruction". To be sure, I personally agree that "a forward-looking, progressive macroeconomics - such as Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) - requires economic activity to be in balance with the natural environment", but I think it is really important, to address and break the easy conceptual link between Environmental Economics and Commodity Money.
A lot of people come into Environmental Economics from engineering or natural science, and such a background predisposes one against social convention ("fiat" money, nominal accounting) and for objective measures (real accounting, hence commodity money, gold standards, and thermodynamic money standards). "Money as a thing" is one of the most engrained concepts in our culture and it dovetails with the engineer/scientist tendency to prefer a commodity standard for money.
At present, monetary austerity is being used as an argument for environmental business as usual ("we cannot afford the investment needed to transition to a green energy economy"). This is a conceptual mistake of mixing resource austerity with money austerity, but if you believe money should map resources, you can't break the link between money austerity and resource austerity. The fact is that MMT through "functional finance" provides a way to justify that yes, we do (if only we have the political will) have the money to mobilize the resources necessary for the massive investment involved in a wholesale transition to a green energy future. This is akin to Keynes' quip that
"Thus we are so sensible, have schooled ourselves to so close a semblance of prudent financiers, taking careful thought before we add to the 'financial' burdens of posterity by building them houses to live in, that we have no such easy escape from the sufferings of unemployment".
We may in fact paraphrase Keynes: "Thus we are so sensible taking careful thought before we add to the financial burdens of posterity by building them windfarms to power their society, that we have no escape from the sufferings of environmental destruction".
To be sure, I personally agree that "a forward-looking, progressive macroeconomics - such as Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) - requires economic activity to be in balance with the natural environment", but I think it is really important, to address and break the easy conceptual link between Environmental Economics and Commodity Money.
The Keynes paraphrase is new, though. I distribute. You re-distribute. He gives your hard-earned money to lazy scroungers. -- JakeS
At an early Centre of Full Employment and Equity Conference (CofFEE) held in 1999 in Newcastle, Australia, I presented a paper, which probed the question of the "Future of Work" and the environmental constraints facing capitalist economies. This conference paper was subsequently published as W.F. Mitchell (2000) `The Job Guarantee in a Small Open Economy'. Economic and Labour Relations Review, Vol. 11, supplement). A scanned copy is available - The Job Guarantee in a Small Open Economy. At the same conference, UMKC MMT colleague Mat Forstater gave an exceptional paper - Full Employment and Environmental Sustainability - where he outlined the way in which the central themes of MMT (with respect to policy implications) were consistent with the goal of environmental sustainability.
At the same conference, UMKC MMT colleague Mat Forstater gave an exceptional paper - Full Employment and Environmental Sustainability - where he outlined the way in which the central themes of MMT (with respect to policy implications) were consistent with the goal of environmental sustainability.
Another was Bill Domhoff. Mirta and I are driving south in April to try to catch the Canyonlands area in Spring bloom, and I am working on a lunch date with him in Santa Clara. I want to discuss the next phase of trying to recapture the Democratic Party. paul spencer
I want to discuss the next phase of trying to recapture the Democratic Party.
I also recall presenting on at your conferences on how often the cause of environmental degradation is unemployment. When the govt. doesn't spend enough to cover its tax liabilities and residual `savings desires' the economy will cut down trees, pollute the air and water, and in general do whatever it takes to avoid the non payment penalties. ... Also, let me suggest the only reason we are mmt and not pk [postkeynesian] is because the remaining pk's failed to ingest `the currency is a public monopoly' and run with it as we did. Also interesting is how the only progressives left standing are mmt. All the `out of paradigm progressives'/deficit doves/logically deficient/etc. have turned regressive, supporting US FICA tax hikes and cap and trade, VAT, and other highly regressive taxation, as well as `entitlement cuts' and export led growth policy.
Also, let me suggest the only reason we are mmt and not pk [postkeynesian] is because the remaining pk's failed to ingest `the currency is a public monopoly' and run with it as we did.
Also interesting is how the only progressives left standing are mmt. All the `out of paradigm progressives'/deficit doves/logically deficient/etc. have turned regressive, supporting US FICA tax hikes and cap and trade, VAT, and other highly regressive taxation, as well as `entitlement cuts' and export led growth policy.
Yes, DNC probably all think that way but leave it to the designated attack-dogs to say it. Out here in the WA state sticks, though, our Progressive Caucus is supported by about 40% of the State Party organization on almost any subject and often can field a majority. Same in California and Oregon. paul spencer
@ Warren Mosler: You write I also recall presenting on at your conferences on how often the cause of environmental degradation is unemployment. When the govt. doesn't spend enough to cover its tax liabilities and residual `savings desires' the economy will cut down trees, pollute the air and water, and in general do whatever it takes to avoid the non payment penalties.and today I read The environmental impact of austerityThe Greek state without any real understanding of the needs of its people, without any understanding of the consequences of its actions imposed another tax on heating oil which increased its price by 48%. The consequences? A lot of fuel businesses will close which will result in further unemployment People are freezing in their homes with disastrous consequences for vulnerable groups like the elderly, the disabled and the sick School students in the north of the country are freezing The smog in urban areas is reaching dangerous levels (scientists at the University of Athens are talking about a further 5,000 premature deaths per year in the area of Athens alone) The few remaining woodlands of Greece are being looted by illegal logging. The irony is that the state has been unable to collect even 1/5 of the projected tax revenues. So, what has come out of this initiative that is endangering the health of the population and is an ecological disaster? Nothing. Another blunder that is making the Greek people suffer, another blunder of the incompetent people that govern us. Where will it all end?I am also reminded that one of the many themes of David Graeber's recent book on Debt is that indebted people are prone to committing atrocities in a flight forward as they raise the stakes trying to get out of debt by striking it lucky. Graeber's dramatic example is the Spanish conquistadors in Central and South America, but obviously "environmental destruction for the purpose of avoiding the penalties of debt nonpayment" reflects the same social and (a)moral dynamics.
You write
I also recall presenting on at your conferences on how often the cause of environmental degradation is unemployment. When the govt. doesn't spend enough to cover its tax liabilities and residual `savings desires' the economy will cut down trees, pollute the air and water, and in general do whatever it takes to avoid the non payment penalties.
The Greek state without any real understanding of the needs of its people, without any understanding of the consequences of its actions imposed another tax on heating oil which increased its price by 48%. The consequences? A lot of fuel businesses will close which will result in further unemployment People are freezing in their homes with disastrous consequences for vulnerable groups like the elderly, the disabled and the sick School students in the north of the country are freezing The smog in urban areas is reaching dangerous levels (scientists at the University of Athens are talking about a further 5,000 premature deaths per year in the area of Athens alone) The few remaining woodlands of Greece are being looted by illegal logging. The irony is that the state has been unable to collect even 1/5 of the projected tax revenues. So, what has come out of this initiative that is endangering the health of the population and is an ecological disaster? Nothing. Another blunder that is making the Greek people suffer, another blunder of the incompetent people that govern us. Where will it all end?
A lot of fuel businesses will close which will result in further unemployment People are freezing in their homes with disastrous consequences for vulnerable groups like the elderly, the disabled and the sick
School students in the north of the country are freezing
The smog in urban areas is reaching dangerous levels (scientists at the University of Athens are talking about a further 5,000 premature deaths per year in the area of Athens alone)
The few remaining woodlands of Greece are being looted by illegal logging.
The irony is that the state has been unable to collect even 1/5 of the projected tax revenues. So, what has come out of this initiative that is endangering the health of the population and is an ecological disaster? Nothing. Another blunder that is making the Greek people suffer, another blunder of the incompetent people that govern us. Where will it all end?
The Keynes paraphrase is new, though.
that's the jewel in the lotus! It's a fine line between homage, parody, and consumer opportunism. Jess Walter
Boehner re-elected as House speaker John Boehner was re-elected Speaker of the House of Representatives Thursday with 220 votes, just a few more than he needed. The Ohio Republican began his second term as speaker by warning of the "anchor of debt" hanging over the nation. And he urged the House to be humble, remembering that "We're standing here not to be something, but do something." There had been some thought that conservatives might challenge Boehner, but in the end, no serious opponent emerged. Democrats voted for Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, but no Republican other than Boehner got more than three votes.
John Boehner was re-elected Speaker of the House of Representatives Thursday with 220 votes, just a few more than he needed.
The Ohio Republican began his second term as speaker by warning of the "anchor of debt" hanging over the nation.
And he urged the House to be humble, remembering that "We're standing here not to be something, but do something."
There had been some thought that conservatives might challenge Boehner, but in the end, no serious opponent emerged. Democrats voted for Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, but no Republican other than Boehner got more than three votes.
But the drama of this Kabuki Theater show served admirably as cover for the renewal of tax breaks for Goldman-Sachs, NASCAR, et cetera ad nauseum. That has got to please our political class from the center-right, Obama, to the far right, Tea Party Caucus. As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
Forget about the divisions between saltwater and freshwater economists. The hottest debate in economics right now is about Smaug, the dragon nemesis in J.R.R. Tolkein's novel "The Hobbit."
by JakeS - May 15 7 comments
by Metatone - May 14 85 comments
by ARGeezer - May 16 13 comments
by Nomad - May 10 14 comments
by gmoke - May 17 1 comment
by DoDo - May 20 1 comment
by DoDo - May 12 10 comments
by Migeru - May 6 100 comments
by DoDo - May 201 comment
by gmoke - May 171 comment
by ARGeezer - May 1613 comments
by JakeS - May 157 comments
by Metatone - May 1485 comments
by DoDo - May 1210 comments
by Nomad - May 1014 comments
by Migeru - May 78 comments
by marco - May 782 comments
by Migeru - May 6100 comments
by Ted Welch - May 35 comments
by afew - May 340 comments
by ceebs - May 26 comments
by gmoke - Apr 301 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 3067 comments
by joelado - Apr 2954 comments
by Metatone - Apr 2854 comments
by ATinNM - Apr 275 comments
by ceebs - Apr 265 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2686 comments