A video showing US soldiers in Iraq taunting thirsty children with a bottle of water has caused outrage.

The footage shows a group of children desperately chasing a truck so they can get a drink.

Today the US Department of Defense confirmed the video showed US soldiers and said the images were 'unfortunate'.

The faces of the two men in the vehicle are not revealed but they can be heard saying in American sounding accents: 'You want some water? Keep running.'

The video

The article

Let me start with taxes. Max and I have a philosophy: We believe that you know how to spend your money far better than the federal government does. (Applause.) We believe that when you have more of your own money in your pocket to save, spend or invest, the economy benefits. (Applause.) Democrats believe they can spend your money better than you can. So over the past five years we have acted on our philosophy and passed the largest tax relief since Ronald Reagan was in the White House. (Applause.)

In other words, we just didn't talk about philosophy --there's too many philosophers in Washington -- we acted.

As a philosophy professor in Washington, I am particularly concerned. May be if I stopped teaching there would peace in the Middle East and the Budget would be balanced and the poor would eat.

The again, in our defense:

1 -- Apparently philosophy is everywhere in the District.

2 -- This is not the first time we have been blamed. Forget Socrates' corruption of the youth and remember Gavroche:

Je suis tombé par terre, c'est la faute à Voltaire
Le nez dans le ruisseau, c'est la faute à Rousseau
Je ne suis pas notaire, c'est la faute à Voltaire
Je suis petit oiseau, c'est la faute à Rousseau

There was a great discussion about Hersh on Iran, initiated by Bob. Essentially, Hersh says that Lebanon was a test for a possible attack against Iran.

Here is Robert Fisk's take:

Iran, as Hizbollah's principal supporter, clearly thinks so too. President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who usually talks far more than he thinks, condemned the US for supplying Israel with the weapons it used on Lebanese civilians - perfectly true. But he did not say Hizbollah's missiles come from a new-generation Iranian arsenal that did not even exist during the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war. While the US will be keen to assess the effectiveness of its weapons - albeit largely used on civilians - no one should doubt that Iran will also be assessing the success of its new Fajr missiles - and their effect on the Israeli army.

What if both journalists are right?  What if each president deliberately tried to test its manhood by blowing up so many civilians in a proxy war? If that is the case, is there even room for a scandal? Or should we just live a aesthetic life of irony, of private giggles, and give up progressive hope and  public agendas?

(It's been a rough few weeks on my psyche...not this pessimistic in general...)

A brief history first:

In philosophy courses, we don't let students make ad hominem arguments. They have as much persuasive value as "yo moma jokes" (Ad Mominem?)

However you call it, it is low but seems to work in American politics these days.

Today's case: al-Mashhadani

The deaths of two CBS journalists on Monday means the Iraq conflict is now the deadliest war for reporters in the past century.

Since 2003, 71 journalists have been killed in Iraq, more than the 63 killed in Vietnam, 17 killed in Korea -- and now the 69 killed in World War II, according to Freedom Forum.

The Iraq numbers do not include the 26 members of media support staff who have also died, as counted by the Committee to Protect Journalists.

In this diary, I would like to present what I consider the worse scenario, my biggest fear, but also my only hope, coming from the international community.

Promoted by Colman

Now, in an exclusive interview, Miller reveals how the attack on the Cole spurred her reporting on Al Qaida and led her, in July 2001, to a still-anonymous top-level White House source, who shared top-secret NSA signals intelligence (SIGINT) concerning an even bigger impending Al Qaida attack, perhaps to be visited on the continental United States.

Ultimately, Miller never wrote that story either. But two months later -- on Sept. 11 -- Miller and her editor at the Times, Stephen Engelberg, both remembered and regretted the story they "didn't do."