Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.

Two NY Times stories

by das monde Mon Oct 10th, 2005 at 08:13:32 AM EST

Amidst the terrible news from Pakistan, there are other remarkable stories. I wish to bring attention to the following two articles from the NY Times of October 10th.

As Polar Ice Turns to Water, Dreams of Treasure Abound

Bush's Veil Over History

The first article considers environmental and economical implications of the Arctic ice cap melting. This issue was touched here at European Tribune a few times. .

The second article is written by Kitty Kelley, the author of the book "The Family: The Real Story of the Bush Dynasty." It is about the Executive Order 13233, signed by George W. Bush on November 1st, 2001.

The melting Arctic ice cap may offer striking opportunities: drastically shorter shipping routes, new oil fields and other natural resourses, new fisheries and tourist destinations. The meltic ice cap would also mean new troubles, in particular - border disputes.

Sheila Watt-Cloutier, the leader of a transnational Inuit group, put it this way:

As long as it's ice, nobody cares except us, because we hunt and fish and travel on that ice. However, the minute it starts to thaw and becomes water, then the whole world is interested.
Signs of world's interest are indeed getting abound. New research stations and icebreakers, port investments, development of natural gas fields, colloboration and disputes, interest from China and India... The Northwest passage between Europe and Asia atop Canada can be expected within 20 years with the present rate fo global warming. The Pentagon assesses viability of its weapons and navigational systems in the north. The lengthy NY Times article describes many aspects well.

Kitty Kelley's article describes a lucid expression of the secretive character of Bush's administration. The little known Executive Order 13233 allows a release of private papers of a former president only with the approval of both that former president (or his heirs) and the current one. Before the Executive Order, all papers, except those pertaining to national security, had to be made available 12 years after a president left office. Bush did the paperwork just in time to protect Reagan's papers. Bill Clinton objected the order and wanted his files open, but the Bush administration denies the access. The Order can be reversed by a future president, Congress' legislation or court's decision.

Unless one of these efforts succeeds, George W. Bush and his father can see to it that their administrations pass into history without examination. Their rationales for waging wars in the Middle East will go unchallenged. There will be no chance to weigh the arguments that led the administration to condone torture by our armed forces. The problems of federal agencies entrusted with public welfare during times of national disaster - 9/11 and Hurricane Katrina - will be unaddressed. Details on no-bid contracts awarded to politically connected corporations like Halliburton will escape scrutiny, as will the president's role in Environmental Protection Agency's policies on water and air polluters.

[Crossposted at Booman Tribune.]

A comment: each of these are noteworthy and worth a diary on their own. As far as the ice thawing...it saddens me that countries will start fighting over the area, and seemingly forget the disaster that is unfolding with the melting ice. Will we ever learn?

As for Bush 1 and 2...we can only hope we get a Spitzer type President in, who is willing to completely reveal the depth of the corruption of that Cartel. It will have to be someone outside the Club, who doesnt want to have a gig with Carlyle after their term is up...

"Once in awhile we get shown the light, in the strangest of places, if we look at it right" - Hunter/Garcia

by whataboutbob on Mon Oct 10th, 2005 at 11:14:35 AM EST
IMHO the next Democratic President would do well to use his first executive order for a blanket reversal of all of W's executive orders.

A society committed to the notion that government is always bad will have bad government. And it doesn't have to be that way. — Paul Krugman
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Oct 10th, 2005 at 12:04:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Go to: [ European Tribune Homepage : Top of page : Top of comments ]