by Ben P
Mon Feb 6th, 2006 at 04:05:55 AM EST
Juan Cole's latest two posts, which are quite extensive attempts - based on government documents and Arab media - to try to unravel the history of the controversy.
Three things stick out in particular:
- Saudi Arabia was not particularly involved. Cole posits that Egypt was a more important instigator, as he looks back at newspaper reports from last fall, in the context of Mubarak's parliamentary "campaign", throwing red meat to Islamic and anti-western sentiment.
- That the nature of the protests were actually quite limited and the vast majority of the protests were peaceful. Violence only occurred in Gaza, Syria, and Lebanon - and Cole thinks there are particular social and political reasons for this violence, which I won't elaborate here.
- All the Arab newspapers (mostly from Iraq) he quotes condemned the cartoons as unfortunate and offensive and the West's position as hypocrtical, but none of them advocated violence and only a few advocated boycotts and various measures involving diplomatic protocol.
I don't really have a point to make here other than that it is important to know the actual nature of what happened before pontificating further.