The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
But it's quite daunting to tackle issues and hope to solve them that are as large as poverty, and healthcare. Sure it's disturbing to hear 45 million people are uninsured. But it's also disturbing to know that nationalized healthcare systems ration healthcare through waiting lists, and many are far, far behind the US in terms of healthcare technology. I have lived in an nationalized healthcare system, and the American system. Each has +/-'s. If I have a serious healthcare problem, there is no question that I would want to be treated in the US.
And there is so much discussion to have around each one of those statements--45 million uninsured, waiting lists, lag in technology. Each of those requires a pretty indepth knowledge of the various systems, and the tradeoffs between the various systems. Do the 45 million not receive healthcare? Some of them are 20's and 30's working in high tech startups, choosing not to pay for health insurance. Some of them get healthcare at hospitals as they can not be turned away legally--all hospitals have indigent care budgets, recognizing their need to care for the uninsured--is that an efficient way to handle them--of course not. But is a one year waiting list for hip replacements for the elderly an efficient way? Of course not. Every one of the above comments can be debated, shown to be true some place, not others. So I guess my answer to your questions on the 45 million, or on bashing, is that often it seems the pot calling the kettle black. It's interesting because when I first came on this site, someone from Europe was basically making this last point about the "free marketers", I believed they called them--in that they were just on the attack against the more socialist European models. So I think they were also complaining about bashing. The lack of a fact base we can agree on probably condemns us to this feeling--because someone arguing the opposite side as you, will have a mental framework they are relying on, and you don't know their framework--and if you did, you might challenge it.
So sorry for the disorganized nature of the above thoughts. But I guess I'm supporting both your and Coleman's efforts to lead an effort to develop, or more hopefully, find existing data bases that we can use. Let me close this, and drop you a second note on the WSJ article.
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 14 8 comments
by Oui - Jan 17
by ARGeezer - Jan 17 8 comments
by Oui - Jan 10 91 comments
by Oui - Jan 13 4 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jan 6 7 comments
by Oui - Jan 4 91 comments
by Oui - Jan 9 31 comments
by Oui - Jan 195 comments
by Oui - Jan 17
by ARGeezer - Jan 178 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 148 comments
by Oui - Jan 134 comments
by Oui - Jan 131 comment
by Oui - Jan 1091 comments
by Oui - Jan 931 comments
by Oui - Jan 812 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jan 67 comments
by Oui - Jan 6115 comments
by ARGeezer - Jan 541 comments
by Oui - Jan 491 comments
by Oui - Jan 382 comments
by Oui - Jan 211 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 3118 comments
by Oui - Dec 2913 comments
by asdf - Dec 285 comments
by Oui - Dec 28
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 2612 comments