The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
As I wrote, not really - at their 'expense' only in the sense that politicians will excuse their lack of investment in that field with high-speed rail, i.e. "see there, I spent x billions on rail".
From this railwayman's perspective, both are needed, high-speed networks and investment into the old network (mainlines AND branchlines).
BTW, you might be interested, I wrote a diary about my view on rail 'reforms' in the EU. *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
Must have been the dark atmosphere.
Today's hyper-ugly Penn Station has 11+1 platforms with 21 parallel tracks. Köln Hbf only has 6 platforms (tough maybe wider ones) and 11 tracks.
Demolishing the old Penn Station is said to have been a first-order architectural crime - judging from the photos in the link, that appears to be true. *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
We did this with a friend in a small station, but on 1st of April.
You may also add to your diary that the State owned swiss railway (SBB/CFF/FFS) is not loosing money anymore : +24.0 mio CHF in 2003 +42.6 mio CHF in 2004
So all in all, I think you Swiss quite rightly spend as much money on both new and old railways as the Germans and French should have spent, too - yours is a model, the best model to follow. (To a lesser degree, Spain too.) *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 18 15 comments
by gmoke - Jan 13 8 comments
by gmoke - Dec 22
by Oui - Jan 22
by Oui - Jan 20
by Oui - Jan 19
by Oui - Jan 17
by Oui - Jan 16
by Oui - Jan 15
by Oui - Jan 151 comment
by Oui - Jan 14
by Oui - Jan 141 comment
by Oui - Jan 132 comments
by Oui - Jan 133 comments
by Oui - Jan 13
by gmoke - Jan 138 comments
by Oui - Jan 12
by Oui - Jan 122 comments
by Oui - Jan 11
by Oui - Jan 112 comments