The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
You also misread me because you equate 'peace' with 'fair peace' (rather than end of armed conflict). And 'Milosevic treatment' may sound a good retort towards hypocrites, but personally I am not too fond of such talk, given what I saw of the results of this 'Milosevic treatment'. *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
no. i do not misread you. we all know what "peace at any price" means to the old white boys who have first been terrorists themselves under the british occupation and then either continued their careers in the military or in politics. these old boys will not learn anything new, they should be sent into retirement, or, in the case of 'special' people - incorregible war criminals - like sharon, mofaz and some others, given the 'milosevic treatment' and sent off to a jail somewhere in the hague. (and i dont confuse this with what nato did to yugoslavia, what was a crime no less than the iraq invasion).
gush shalom and the refuseniks are more than comendable - IMO they deserved the nobel for peace rather than IAEA - but they are a minority in a country with a bad case of criminal leadership and deluded masses. to suggest that either movement is representative of public opinion would be wishful thinking at best. the current govt of sharons likud, as extremist as it may appear to us, or even the settler movement, are far more representative of public opinion in israel than either gush shalom or seruv.
also, i stand by my other formulation: in israel, everybody goes to the military for 3 (girls 2) years, so it is not like anybody over the age of 18 can reasonably deny knowledge of the atrocities in the territories. let that sink in: we are speaking here of a nation of 5-6 million where everybody knows or has heared of crimes against humanity being perpetrated by their nation against defenseless people, where everybody takes part and where everybody save a small minority chose to applaud, justify, or at least ignore these crimes and return to business as usual after helping to commit them. there you have 5 million people who know but dont care, who could have done or said something but chose not to, whose leaders actually state that their moral categories are so different from ours that we would never understand them and should thus refrain from criticizing their acts. this is a stark contrast to the 3rd reich, where many, many people not directly involved in the war effort could reasonably deny knowledge of the atrocities being perpetrated by their government.
since we are trying to repair the world, i'll state that my favorite solution for the israel/palestine problem would be the one nation model, where everybody gets the same rights under the law and where all palestinians are given full citizenship, where religious kooks are relegated to the status of curiosities, where reparations are paid to all palestinians, where the palestinian diaspora is given the right to return plus ample opportunities at least unto the 4th generation, where nakhba-denial and zionism prohibition laws are passed modeled after the current holocaust denial and NS prohibition laws here in germany and austria. the place should be occupied by the international community and all weapons in excess of what is needed for reasonable self-defense should be destroyed (that would include their nukes and chem and bio stuff) until the situation has stabilized enough to be confident that both sides will not start killing each other again. i see the israeli political class as essentially irresponsible and incapable or unwilling of managing their country in a constructive way without causing problems, this is straightforward.
i am realist enough to understand that most of this is politically impossible, but it is important that the troubles cease once and for all, and in terms and conditions very different from the "peace at any price (to them)" favored by the politicasters in power. the public discussion has until now been too influenced by people who should have no say in it because they are part of the problem. the first step towards a livable solution to the current troubles in palestine should take the form of a healthy discussion without taboos, just this time without those unwilling to concede to a just and equitable peace.
ok, i suppose that will put me at risk of being extradited to israel for 'hateful statements', or, god forbid, pissing off jerome or bernhard.
let the flamewars ensue !
Well, Uri Avnery was one of those old boys - yet he managed to change. As for some other old boys, you continue to misread me: I indeed don't expect anything good from Sharon (and not much good anymore from ousted Labour leader Perez), the change of strategy I posit is not a quality improvement (see also my reply to Marek). Meanwhile, a number of others who push the agenda in Israel are not old boys, at least not old enough to have been pre-Israel terrorists - Netanyahu, Barak, a lot of others.
As for the refuseniks and Gush Shalom, I did not say they 'represent public opinion' - I know they are a minority (and hope some day they will be majority), but the thing you fail to contemplate is my rejection of blanket statements. If you say "Israelis this Israelis that", you denounce the Gush Shalom people too. This is like if I said that "Austrians are Nazi apologists", based on very broadly held (extending well into the SPÖ) false views about the nature of and Austrians' role in the Third Reich.
Your point about widely held hypocrisy and guilt in connection to the draft would again be a very good argument, had you not overstated it. For, not everyone goes to the military (older immigrants - the impact of the Russian immigration on the level of the Israeli public's ignorance is rarely discussed - and religious people don't), and (by far) not everyone in the IDF goes on active duty in the occupied territories, and not everyone who does will have a full oversight over what's going on - in fact, youngsters ignorant of even recent history and not personally witnessing the clear war crimes (or having insight into decisionmaking behind the parading-as-security-measures ones) can soldier through their time in full conviction of righteousness - i.e, be part of the self-deluded masses. (Of course, one might say such lack of critical thinking has implicit racism behind it.)
On your next two paragraphs, I am in almost perfect agreement, tough I add that such an ideal solution has mass opposition and to be suppressed political movements on the Palestinian side, too. (I suspect you do see this just weren't explicit.)
Your last was unnecessary tough: on one hand, Bernhard has no admin rights here - his is Moon of Alabama, on the other, I suspect it is much harder to pis of Jérôme than for example me - as yet no one was banned on this site. *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
One more point I forgot: given that recent nation-building efforts have a meagre record, including non-US ones, to believe that this can be done practically seems rather close to (the more naive) neocons' delusions about remaking the Middle East. *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 17
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 10 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 1 6 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 3 32 comments
by Oui - Sep 6 3 comments
by gmoke - Aug 25 1 comment
by Oui - Sep 18
by Oui - Sep 171 comment
by Oui - Sep 154 comments
by Oui - Sep 151 comment
by Oui - Sep 1315 comments
by Oui - Sep 13
by Oui - Sep 124 comments
by Oui - Sep 1010 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 103 comments
by Oui - Sep 10
by Oui - Sep 92 comments
by Oui - Sep 84 comments
by Oui - Sep 715 comments
by Oui - Sep 72 comments
by Oui - Sep 63 comments
by Oui - Sep 54 comments
by gmoke - Sep 5
by Oui - Sep 47 comments