The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
So the assymetry is supposed to be normal?
Perhaps the human civilisation is not grown up yet. Ancient wisdoms say: don't cause pain to the others; control your own desires and powers. Yet the prevailing economic ideologies explicitly say to follow only your own interests, disregard the others; and they glorify unlimited greed and firmly oppose any critique of it. Was this really what Adam Smith meant?
Whenever the legislature attempts to regulate the differences between masters and their workmen, its counsellors are always the masters. When the regulation, therefore, is in favour of the workmen, it is always just and equitable; but it is sometimes otherwise when in favour of the masters.
People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices.
The pretence that corporations are necessary for the better government of the trade, is without any foundation. The real and effectual discipline which is exercised over a workman, is not that of his corporation, but that of his customers. It is the fear of losing their employment which restrains his frauds and corrects his negligence. An exclusive corporation necessarily weakens the force of this discipline. A particular set of workmen must then be employed, let them behave well or ill. It is upon this account that, in many large incorporated towns, no tolerable workmen are to be found, even in some of the most necessary trades. If you would have your work tolerably executed, it must be done in the suburbs, where the workmen, having no exclusive privilege, have nothing but their character to depend upon, and you must then smuggle it into the town as well as you can.
The Wealth of Nations makes for some jaw-dropping reading (just like Macchiavelli's The Prince, by the way) because of how strongly and frequently it is misrepresented in the public discourse. For instace:
Such regulations may, no doubt, be considered as in some respect a violation of natural liberty. But those exertions of the natural liberty of a few individuals, which might endanger the security of the whole society, are, and ought to be, restrained by the laws of all governments; of the most free, as well as or the most despotical.
People copy reference lists from papers just so it looks like their work is properly referenced. That is a fact.
A society committed to the notion that government is always bad will have bad government. And it doesn't have to be that way. — Paul Krugman
by ARGeezer - Aug 20 13 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 16 46 comments
by Oui - Aug 18 31 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 13 13 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 8 125 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 6 26 comments
by Oui - Aug 8 16 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 1 115 comments
by ARGeezer - Aug 2013 comments
by Oui - Aug 198 comments
by Oui - Aug 1831 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 1646 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 1313 comments
by Oui - Aug 816 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 8125 comments
by Oui - Aug 75 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 626 comments
by Oui - Aug 431 comments
by Oui - Aug 34 comments
by gmoke - Aug 21 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 1115 comments
by Oui - Aug 19 comments
by Oui - Jul 3023 comments
by Oui - Jul 2823 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 2711 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jul 255 comments
by john_evans - Jul 2580 comments
by Oui - Jul 256 comments