The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Reform is in essence always necessary, as a country needs to adapt to changing demography, technology, and socio-economic contexts. And I think that, as I know this, it's somewhat unconsciously that I slip into the "things are not so bad" approach, more as a retaliation against an opposite argumentation which I find to be difficult to accept as being true, especially when hammered by the media, business representatives etc
If I were to reform France's economic structure, I'd start by finding a way to distribute shares to a majority of employees rather than to a majority of obscure share-holders, on a basis that can be discussed in another thread. I indeed believe that one of the main reasons why French companies are reluctant to recruit, is not necessarily, as we're brainstormed to think, because French employment contracts are rigid ... but probably more because companies are scared of taking risks in general, seeing as how the global context is unpredictable, local competition is often fierce, and most importantly because they are told by share-holders that immediate cost-reduction and profit-generation is more important that long-term planning.
In Airbus alone, there are currently 60 executive positions that have been unfilled for over a year, because the job descriptions ask, in language that I'll translate here, for someone who's available 24 hours a day, aged 25, with 40 years of experience. You can see where this is going ... On the opposite end of the scale, CEOs are given massive benefits when laid off and thus don't frankly give a damn where it all goes.
Now if employees held shares, wouldn't a new recruit be less likely to be a slacker, being motivated by the prospect of earning more for himself/herself? Wouldn't a majority of employee share-holders vote against, as much as is reasonably possible, layoffs and such? This is debatable, of course. It's just as equally possible that current employees would be power-hungry, want to keep all the shares to themselves, and be even more afraid of recruiting new people.
by paul spencer - Dec 6 4 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 26 4 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 25
by gmoke - Nov 19 6 comments
by Oui - Nov 20 16 comments
by paul spencer - Dec 64 comments
by Oui - Dec 47 comments
by Oui - Dec 32 comments
by Oui - Nov 3010 comments
by gmoke - Nov 30
by Oui - Nov 26
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 264 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 25
by Oui - Nov 2016 comments
by Oui - Nov 193 comments
by Oui - Nov 1913 comments
by gmoke - Nov 196 comments
by Oui - Nov 1711 comments
by Oui - Nov 1431 comments
by Oui - Nov 1316 comments
by Oui - Nov 107 comments
by Oui - Nov 830 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 781 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 711 comments
by Oui - Nov 697 comments