Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Great post. We have
  1. a refutation of Division of Labour and Comparative Advantage because specialization due to trade leads to loss of resilience of local economies
    Many of these small towns are crippled by economies that are not diversified.
    And
  2. a call for government spending in education and infrastructures
    No, what we need to do is build on the educational base, and expand it (that includes adult education and training).  We also need to rebuild infrastructure, because, at least in America, infrastructure spending has been woefully inadequate for thirty years, and counting.
    Maybe we need to rethink the free movement of capital, goods, services and workers, given that (as Adam Smith said: always back to the good old guru of liberalism) labour is the least easily transported of all factors of production.


A society committed to the notion that government is always bad will have bad government. And it doesn't have to be that way. — Paul Krugman
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jan 25th, 2006 at 12:30:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Labor also thinks for itself, unlike capital.  Capital is a planned input, one-way.  Labor requires negotiation and conscious decision making on the part of the input.

Services, as a practical matter, are also not moved very easily, in many cases.  An Indian operator may be able to take over the job of Dell's customer service, but he can't put your money in the cash register at Wal-Mart, or sell you a phone at Nextel, or fix your iPod at the Apple store, or whatever else you may need.  You can't, for example, outsource the work of a locksmith.

I don't see what you mean by a refutation of the Division of Labor and Comparative Advantage.  Both are largely true, in my opinion.  In many cases, the economic losses in these small towns are the result of the citizens having elected a state or local government made up of total fools.  Rural states have skewed their policies, usually in favor of agriculture, and, today, they wonder why all they can produce is heavily-subsidized agriculture.  (Gosh, that's just shocking, "in'nit"?)  Hence why I've made it a habit to attack rural, Red-Staters as being the true "welfare queens" (to use Ronald Reagan's words), because they're completely dependent upon the tax dollars of urban, coastal cities (the Blue States, or the Blue areas of Red States).

Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.

by Drew J Jones (pedobear@pennstatefootball.com) on Wed Jan 25th, 2006 at 01:38:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I mean, division of labour and comparative advantage lead to specialization which leads to loss of resilience. Since Labour is the least mobile of the factors of production it is also the one that bears the brunt of the consequences of lack of resilience when the conditions change. Labour is people which means it is the one factor of production where ethical considerations are most important. You can't have resilient local economies and, at the same time, global pressures towards specialization.

I could try to write a diary about this, but it would be exclusionary.

A society committed to the notion that government is always bad will have bad government. And it doesn't have to be that way. — Paul Krugman

by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Wed Jan 25th, 2006 at 01:51:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series