Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
It's sufficient, efficient, but has chances of being too optimized. You could land on all sorts of other entries on the way:

[Nikers et al, 1983] , [NH4] etc

I know, I know, it's unlikely. But being a programmer, I tend to cover my bases. I'd rather waste afew milliseconds typing the extra 2 letters, than having the inconvenience of finding unecessary matches on the way.

This of course is not perfect, as I could just type [new] as much as I [new] want just to [new] throw all of [new] this off.

There is [no] ideal solution, but I certainly will [not] settle for a [non]-complete ma[nner] to look for [novel] entries.

by Alex in Toulouse on Fri Jan 27th, 2006 at 05:28:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Others have rated this comment as follows:


Occasional Series