The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 From: "Paul Starobin" <PStarobin@nationaljournal.com> I wonder if followers of JRL would agree that, as I sense, we are at the dawn of a new era of Russo-phobia in the West? I take the Ukraine gas episode as a case in point. Yes, it can be argued that this is an instance of Kremlin bullying. But it can also be argued that surely a West-leaning Ukraine cannot expect Russia to subsidize its gas supplies. That point, however, is mostly glossed over in Western coverage. My own particular concern is that Kremlin-phobia or Putin-phobiaa measure of which iis justified, given the track record of the Putin regime"is in danger of turning into Russo-phobia. Thus Edward Lucas, in JRL #2006, is not content with saying that Putin "increasingly looks like a monster." He goes on to say that Putin has unleashed "the imperialist urge that lies deep in the Russian psyche." I don't know quite what to make of this kind of political-Jungian analysis. If something like a collective "imperialist urge" can be said to exist, is it absent from other nations' psyches? (The Germans? The British? The Americans?) Whatever might be said of the Russian national psyche it strikes me that we are back at a familiar and unsatisfying place for Western observers of the Russians: We want to like '"them," and we would like them, if they were more like us, but they somehow insist on being more like themselves. And so "they" provoke our fear. When it comes to our view of Russia, must we always be looking through the glass, darkly? Best, Paul Starobin Contributing editor, Atlantic Monthly Moscow bureau chief, Business Week, 1999-2003
I wonder if followers of JRL would agree that, as I sense, we are at the dawn of a new era of Russo-phobia in the West? I take the Ukraine gas episode as a case in point. Yes, it can be argued that this is an instance of Kremlin bullying. But it can also be argued that surely a West-leaning Ukraine cannot expect Russia to subsidize its gas supplies. That point, however, is mostly glossed over in Western coverage. My own particular concern is that Kremlin-phobia or Putin-phobiaa measure of which iis justified, given the track record of the Putin regime"is in danger of turning into Russo-phobia. Thus Edward Lucas, in JRL #2006, is not content with saying that Putin "increasingly looks like a monster." He goes on to say that Putin has unleashed "the imperialist urge that lies deep in the Russian psyche." I don't know quite what to make of this kind of political-Jungian analysis. If something like a collective "imperialist urge" can be said to exist, is it absent from other nations' psyches? (The Germans? The British? The Americans?) Whatever might be said of the Russian national psyche it strikes me that we are back at a familiar and unsatisfying place for Western observers of the Russians: We want to like '"them," and we would like them, if they were more like us, but they somehow insist on being more like themselves. And so "they" provoke our fear. When it comes to our view of Russia, must we always be looking through the glass, darkly?
Best, Paul Starobin Contributing editor, Atlantic Monthly Moscow bureau chief, Business Week, 1999-2003
From: "Robert Harneis" <r.harneis@wanadoo.fr> Subject: VLADIMIR PUTIN MAGICIAN MOUSE OR MONSTER? Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 Permit me to comment on 'Vladimir Putin. Magician, Mouse or Monster' by Edward Lucas, who ought to know his Russia. He writes,"Mr Putin is the first Russian leader since Peter the Great to have thesimple advantages of being punctual, efficient, fit, sober and concise." He seems to have overlooked Catherine the Great, who did pretty well and reportedly often walked ten miles a day. As I understand it Peter the Great was not terrible famous for sobriety. More serioulsy he seems unable to grasp that attempting to re-establish strategic positions recklessly abandoned by his predecessors is not only normal but inevitable. The Russians are agressive he says but it is the United States that now entirely funds the Georgian army and is desperate to rush the Ukraine into NATO. How does he think the USA would react if the Russians constantly stirred up trouble in the former Mexican possessions in the south west of the United States? In addition it would help if he and others did not consistently refer to the Soviet Union and Russia as if they were one and the same thing. Robert Harneis European Correspondent
Permit me to comment on 'Vladimir Putin. Magician, Mouse or Monster' by Edward Lucas, who ought to know his Russia. He writes,"Mr Putin is the first Russian leader since Peter the Great to have thesimple advantages of being punctual, efficient, fit, sober and concise."
He seems to have overlooked Catherine the Great, who did pretty well and reportedly often walked ten miles a day. As I understand it Peter the Great was not terrible famous for sobriety. More serioulsy he seems unable to grasp that attempting to re-establish strategic positions recklessly abandoned by his predecessors is not only normal but inevitable. The Russians are agressive he says but it is the United States that now entirely funds the Georgian army and is desperate to rush the Ukraine into NATO. How does he think the USA would react if the Russians constantly stirred up trouble in the former Mexican possessions in the south west of the United States? In addition it would help if he and others did not consistently refer to the Soviet Union and Russia as if they were one and the same thing.
Robert Harneis European Correspondent
(Has he been reading ET?)
BTW, there was an interesting (and admittedly quite anti-Putin) article in the last Atlantic about Kasparov (yes, the chess player) mounting some opposition movement to challenge Putin. Worth a read, but I don't think it is online yet. Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. -Voltaire
Russia Is Finished: The unstoppable descent of a once great power into social catastrophe and strategic irrelevance, by Jeffrey Tayler, Atlantic Monthly, May 2001.
If Starobin is serious about his position, he should arrange to put one the sharpest ctitiques of Russia, published by his own magazine, in front of the firewall where it's been for years. Or arrange for permission to publish it where the world can still see it.
----- ----- The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter. W. Churchill
Also noted downthread.
by Oui - Jun 25 38 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 24 2 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 16 12 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 15 12 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 10 15 comments
by Bernard - Jun 6 23 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 6 4 comments
by Oui - Jun 8 104 comments
by Oui - Jun 2538 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 242 comments
by Oui - Jun 232 comments
by Oui - Jun 23
by gmoke - Jun 22
by Oui - Jun 20
by Oui - Jun 1915 comments
by asdf - Jun 183 comments
by Oui - Jun 184 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 1612 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 1512 comments
by Oui - Jun 1310 comments
by Oui - Jun 1240 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 1015 comments
by Oui - Jun 95 comments
by Oui - Jun 8104 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 64 comments
by Bernard - Jun 623 comments
by Oui - Jun 6
by Oui - Jun 524 comments