It's a lot easier to read in Auto Format, but I'll also take the opportunity to correct a couple of mistakes:

"Not everybody agrees with this count"

More "he said, she said" in action.

I think it is possible to make a [good] critique of the study's methodology, but no-one has so far. They [the researchers publishing in the Lancet] have used the standard methodology for estimation in disaster zones, which was used for the Pakistan earthquake, the tsunami etc. Mr. Cordesman specialises in high-level strategic analysis and has no visible credentials to analyse death estimates...