The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Pseudoreligious nonsense. If this SO2 sunscreen (or some other technology) proves that no fundamental change is necessary, you still won't even consider changing your opinion.
When the SO2 comes out of the stratophere after civilization collapses,...
...nobody will be around to give a fsck about it. So what?! Besides, read paragraph 3 of the post to understand just how much SO2 will come out.
There is a valid concern here, though I think that Gaianne gives it too much weight for several reasons:
So do I, but "it is our political ecomony that has to change" is a spoken thought and presented as a given, without factual support or room for a counter argument. Without an argument, why our economy has to change, it's religion and not science.
In the absence of change, we enter the scenerio implied by technopolitical's point 2). SO2 injected into the stratosphere keeps the Earth just barely cool enough. Making no change, we keep releasing CO2 into the lower atmosphere at an increasing rate, as a by-product of continuing and expanding industrial civilization. As a result, the amount of SO2 that needs to be injected into the stratosphere also increases, until the precipitating SO2 DOES become an environmental problem. We have then achieved a world that is just barely cool, and multiply polluted.
At what point do these extra problems add to the accelerating destruction of the biosphere to the extent that it ends human life support? That time comes.
Fundamental change is not only necessary, it is going to happen whether or not anybody likes it. The only question is whether there is a way to choose the better, rather than the worse, changes.
nobody will be around to give a fsck about it.
I don't favor policies of extinction.
The Fates are kind.
Am I still making your point for you? Most certainly not. This whole "but $TECHNOLOGY will not accelerate transitioning to $GREEN_PIPEDREAM and is therefore bad" argument is still religious in nature, off-topic anyway and prevents rational discussion of the proper course of action. Besides being just wrong, that is.
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 8 42 comments
by Oui - Dec 4 57 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 27 72 comments
by Oui - Dec 9 23 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 1 4 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 23 37 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 20 72 comments
by Oui - Nov 21 2 comments
by Oui - Dec 923 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 842 comments
by Oui - Dec 457 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 14 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 2772 comments
by gmoke - Nov 26
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 2337 comments
by Oui - Nov 212 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 2072 comments
by Oui - Nov 1510 comments
by ATinNM - Nov 135 comments
by Oui - Nov 134 comments
by Oui - Nov 124 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 10115 comments
by Oui - Nov 428 comments
by Oui - Oct 2916 comments