The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
basically airplanes and airports have become tyranny zones, where the fear of TSA and being bumped off a flight or having it delayed makes everyone submit meekly to the bullying of petty functionaries. so the petty functionaries are having a field day, like teacher's pet made hall monitor for the week.
I flew to Canada and back last month, very irritably wishing for a decent rail service so I wouldn't have to go through all of this idiocy. they were not letting bottled water onto the plane even if it was purchased in the concourse post-security... you could not even buy water in a bottle on the concourse; no, it had to be decanted into a large paper cup, which of course was plastered with Coca Cola advertising. but they let me on with a niji waterbrush full of water, which had it been instead, say, dimethyl mercury, would have enabled me to condemn many/most of my fellow passengers (and myself of course) to an unpleasant end. the laptop passed security w/o even being opened. no, this week we are all afraid of bottled water and shampoo... somehow the Hollywood physics of the whole 2-part liquid explosive thing made all this even more offensive, i.e. the sheer stupidity.
I was thinking as I put my shoes back on and reassembled my luggage and pocket contents that the experience was strangely similar to being processed into and out of jail: one's personal effects all confiscated, then (maybe) returned; partial disrobing; being processed in a lineup like cattle, feeling rumpled and slightly humiliated, being treated like a n unwanted immigrant or a suspected disease vector. Ellis Island. do I feel more like a cow or a prisoner when approaching the gate? not sure.
a paranoid chunk of my brain says that inconsistent conditioning is more effective at behavioural modification than consistent conditioning. the very irrationality and looniness of the scare du jour and the designer-coloured alert levels may make the conditioning of air travellers to meek acceptance of arbitrary authority even more efficacious. a week of peaceful sanity in BC ended with my unwilling return -- interview with a US customs/immi officer who was downright scary: totally affectless, no human response whatsoever, intrusive questions droned at me from a dead blank visage, like fictional descriptions of the old Soviet border agents... a bored, hostile and paranoid bureaucratic underling who you pray will not decide to enliven his day by picking on you. a mischievous impulse urged me to refer chidingly to the signboard at his booth which listed "our promises to you", including "we will welcome you to the United States" -- "welcome" was certainly not among the words said to me -- but discretion was the better part of getting on the damn plane and I was just glad to get ny passport back and leave the eerily robotic young man behind.
at the baggage carousel in SFO the voice of the security announcements came over the Tannoy, syrupy and quaalude-calm, telling us to watch our baggage (as it has for 15 years or so) but adding that "the current national security alert level is Orange" ... and I had that sinking feeling of being back in the loonybin. the whole thing is like a vast intricate game of Simon Says, with (one feels) Kip Hawley rolling on the floor of his private office laughing his ass off as he watches on videotape the suckers lining up, taking their sandals off, draining their soft drinks, hurriedly stashing their lip gloss in the checked baggage. Simon Says give me your lip gloss. Simon Says take your jacket off. Simon Says hop on one foot. Simon Says step out of line...
oh yeah, I forgot, don't make fun of Kip Hawley, either.
agree with the poster upthread, it's a feeling in the air. the feeling of petty power unleashed, or starting to slip the leash. of petty sadists and bullies feeling that they have license to abuse -- in mild, irritating, stupid little ways for now, but how much worse it can get we already know.
so far the UK authorities scored the ultimate own goal, when they deprived a pilot of his contact lens solution. now that's what I call security! The difference between theory and practise in practise ...
Yes.
Randomness enhances disorientation. Disorientation enhances depersonalization.
And because you accept it--for the convenience of flying--it is self-betrayal as well. They are letting you assist in your own subservience training. How kind of them.
This is not paranoia, in the precise sense that this is a subject that has been well-studied. Originally it was studied for counter-brainwashing, but the knowledge is easily re-adapted for brainwashing simple. The Fates are kind.
For the measure sets forth clearly that the designation of an "enemy combatant" is left solely to the executive branch; neither Congress nor the courts have any say in the matter. When this new law is coupled with the existing "Executive Orders" authorizing "lethal force" against arbitrarily designated "enemy combatants," it becomes, quite literally, a license to kill - with the seal of Congressional approval. How arbitrary is this process by which all our lives and liberties are now governed? Dave Niewert at Orcinus has unearthed a remarkable admission of its totally capricious nature. In an December 2002 story in the Washington Post, then-Solicitor General Ted Olson described the anarchy at the heart of the process with admirable frankness: "[There is no] requirement that the executive branch spell out its criteria for determining who qualifies as an enemy combatant," Olson argues. "'There won't be 10 rules that trigger this or 10 rules that end this,' Olson said in the interview. 'There will be judgments and instincts and evaluations and implementations that have to be made by the executive that are probably going to be different from day to day, depending on the circumstances.'" In other words, what is safe to do or say today might imperil your freedom or your life tomorrow. You can never know if you are on the right side of the law, because the "law" is merely the whim of the Leader and his minions: their "instincts" determine your guilt or innocence, and these flutterings in the gut can change from day to day. This radical uncertainty is the very essence of despotism - and it is now, formally and officially, the guiding principle of the United States government.
How arbitrary is this process by which all our lives and liberties are now governed? Dave Niewert at Orcinus has unearthed a remarkable admission of its totally capricious nature. In an December 2002 story in the Washington Post, then-Solicitor General Ted Olson described the anarchy at the heart of the process with admirable frankness:
"[There is no] requirement that the executive branch spell out its criteria for determining who qualifies as an enemy combatant," Olson argues.
"'There won't be 10 rules that trigger this or 10 rules that end this,' Olson said in the interview. 'There will be judgments and instincts and evaluations and implementations that have to be made by the executive that are probably going to be different from day to day, depending on the circumstances.'"
In other words, what is safe to do or say today might imperil your freedom or your life tomorrow. You can never know if you are on the right side of the law, because the "law" is merely the whim of the Leader and his minions: their "instincts" determine your guilt or innocence, and these flutterings in the gut can change from day to day. This radical uncertainty is the very essence of despotism - and it is now, formally and officially, the guiding principle of the United States government.
Orwell would be grimly satisfied, one supposes, at seeing his predictions come true.
The US has been sliding steadily towards tinpot dictatorship for some years; now it appears to have qualified to join the club of tyrannies. The Executive Branch appoints itself judge, jury, and executioner. Don Giorgi can order a hit anywhere on the planet at his whim. "By my order and for the good of the State, the bearer has done what has been done."
I am not posting much lately due to despair. There was no meaningful opposition in the US legislature as Magna Carta was tossed out the window -- 800+ years of juridical precedent, byebye. The arbitrary bullyism of TSA is merely a symptom. The rot goes all the way to the top. The difference between theory and practise in practise ...
by gmoke - Jun 6
by gmoke - May 16 1 comment
by Oui - Jun 13
by Oui - Jun 12
by Oui - Jun 11
by Oui - Jun 104 comments
by Oui - Jun 101 comment
by Oui - Jun 99 comments
by Oui - Jun 93 comments
by Oui - Jun 86 comments
by Oui - Jun 717 comments
by Oui - Jun 62 comments
by Oui - Jun 58 comments
by Oui - Jun 421 comments
by Oui - Jun 3
by Oui - Jun 22 comments
by Oui - Jun 117 comments
by Oui - Jun 11 comment