Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
I don't agree.

The problem is that you can't tax people off car use if you don't give them an alternative. If there is no alternative, they'll simply pay more. This may raise revenue in the short term, but it also has the effect of introducing a rather random car-use tax with random social effects.

While you'll catch the gas guzzlers with this, some people who have to use cars - for example nurses, especially in rural areas - will be unfairly penalised.

A petrol tax only makes sense as part of a wider social transport strategy. Otherwise it's an example of believing in marketism, and the mistaken notion that if you can link a single variable to a single policy factor the wider social effects don't need to be thought through because the invisible hand will magically solve the problem for you.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Sun Oct 8th, 2006 at 12:54:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]
If you want to protect rural nurses, pay them more. If you reduce fuel taxes you reward fuel consumption.

Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Oct 8th, 2006 at 01:51:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Occasional Series