The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
I prefer Dean Baker's take on this (with a hat tip to Laurent G for pointing me in the direction of the excellent Mr Baker):
The Stock Market is Not the Home Team One infuriating feature of business reporting is the constant cheering for a higher stock market. I have nothing against a higher market, but I know of no general public interest in a high stock market. In principle, the stock market represents the discounted value of the future profits of corporate America. If the value rises because the economy can now be seen as growing more rapidly, then this is certainly good news. But, if future profits are projected to be higher because of lower wages or lower corporate taxes (e.g. a higher tax burden on workers or fewer public services), why should the mass of the population, who own little or no stock celebrate? Of course, the higher stock market may just be due to the irrational exuberance of people who control lots of money, as happened in the nineties. This is also not obviously good news. In this case, a higher stock market will shift wealth to those smart enough to get out, from those stupid enough to get in. In short, there is no general public interest in a higher stock market. When reporters celebrate a run-up in the market, their class bias is showing.
One infuriating feature of business reporting is the constant cheering for a higher stock market. I have nothing against a higher market, but I know of no general public interest in a high stock market.
In principle, the stock market represents the discounted value of the future profits of corporate America. If the value rises because the economy can now be seen as growing more rapidly, then this is certainly good news. But, if future profits are projected to be higher because of lower wages or lower corporate taxes (e.g. a higher tax burden on workers or fewer public services), why should the mass of the population, who own little or no stock celebrate?
Of course, the higher stock market may just be due to the irrational exuberance of people who control lots of money, as happened in the nineties. This is also not obviously good news. In this case, a higher stock market will shift wealth to those smart enough to get out, from those stupid enough to get in.
In short, there is no general public interest in a higher stock market. When reporters celebrate a run-up in the market, their class bias is showing.
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 23 7 comments
by Oui - Feb 22 8 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 20 4 comments
by gmoke - Feb 14 2 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 19 13 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 15 23 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 14 13 comments
by Oui - Feb 17 39 comments
by Oui - Feb 25
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 237 comments
by Oui - Feb 228 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 204 comments
by Oui - Feb 2018 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 1913 comments
by Oui - Feb 196 comments
by Oui - Feb 18
by Oui - Feb 1739 comments
by Oui - Feb 168 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 1523 comments
by gmoke - Feb 142 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 1413 comments
by Oui - Feb 144 comments
by Oui - Feb 1239 comments
by Oui - Feb 774 comments
by Oui - Feb 666 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 518 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 412 comments
by Oui - Feb 136 comments