Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
So will they recognize on DKos that you were right to say the Dems needed to take the lead on energy?

Or will those who said: before the elections is not the moment! and those who said: the Dems just won a mandate from the people, they can't change policy now, it's too late! now say: the fact that Bush is picking this up proves the Dems were right not to... ?

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Fri Nov 10th, 2006 at 10:42:11 AM EST
The "mandate" claim falls down on the fact that Energy Independence was part of Six for '06. Certainly in the House there are a number of newly elected Representatives that ran on it. And since it is a wedge issue for the radical right coalition, its a strong partisan advantage for the Democrats if they can portray the Republicans as proposing meaningless window dressing to disguise welfare for the rich.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Fri Nov 10th, 2006 at 11:18:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Maybe, but the "mandate" claim was on DKos the other day in Jerome's gas tax diary...
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Fri Nov 10th, 2006 at 12:19:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Lots of nonsense that doesn't stand close scrutiny is posed on dKos. The Democrats get to claim a mandate for the plan they announced before the election, and the more stink the Republicans raise about it, the more it publicizes the Six in '06 plan, and the more it undermines the pre-election talking point that the Democrats had no plan.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Fri Nov 10th, 2006 at 01:38:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series