The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The thing is that this is not a primary, it is an internal process of an european party.
Because we are in general not restricted to choose between two parties, choosing the candidates is seen as a legitimate internal process. If the parties choose the wrong candidates you can simply vote for another party.
In the french presidential election round one of the elections is more like your primaries as it is (generally, though I assume that you win it all if you get more then 50% in round one) there the two main competitors are elected. Of course, this has it drawbacks too (need I mention Le Pen?). Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
There is always a risk of a 'breakthrough'. An equivalent of Ross Perot anno MCMXCII would earn 20% of the parliamentary representation in most of Europe. And hang on to it for up to four years. This is sort of what happened with Pim Fortuyn in the Netherlands in 2002. Keeps politicians on their toes.
(Except Fortuyn was murdered and his party subsequently ousted after barely a year. But had he lived he might have hung on to those seats).
A system of proportional representation makes open primaries largely redundant, and maybe even dangerous.
This is an internal party primary in which card-carrying members of the party choose the party's candidate. To be a member, you pay a membership fee. You also don't just show up and take out a card to be able to vote. You have to be a member from before (I don't remember which date) and to have met and introduced yourself to your local party section so you are known in the party as a member.
Why? *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
Well, actually, a very big difference. Primaries are "free" for voters, but they are hardly free for the contestants. In addition to which, in the US, actually getting the central party blessing requires a combination of money-generating prowess and ass-kissing, toe the corporate line behavior, demonstrated over a significant period of time. US federal candidates, if they want to stand a chance, bascially have to take a catamite aptitude test, pass it, then hope no one else passed it better.
What's more, this is just the PS internal selection. Nothing stops a candidate from the PS to present himself in the presidential even if they lose here, there's been especially worries about Fabius in this regard. And running as an independent (ie non PS, UMP or a la limite the PCF, the Greens or the UDF) of modest means in France does not mean you are consigned to the dustbin of electoral hopes. Speaking for the left, in the first round in '02, the PS standard bearer got 16% of the vote, PCF and Greens another 7 or 8, and left splinters (Laguiller, Chevenement, et c) got actually like 20%. And that vote, the "real" left primary, was indeed free.
Additionally, you don't have to be a millionaire to get into the Senate in France, though it doesn't necessarily hurt. In the US, being a regular guy, as opposed to wealthy, is the exception, not the rule at nearly all levels of Federal politics.
Unsurprisingly no one has represented the poor in the US since roughly 1968. The Hun is always either at your throat or at your feet. Winston Churchill
Now seriously, can you explain the difference between
If you want the Socialist [or any other] Party candidate to represent you, you join the party [which may or may not include paying dues]. If none of the parties' candidates represents you, you can form your own party. Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
That bothers me, too. Also, it semi-institutionalises the two-party system. *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
I think it is insane that you have to pay a party money to be able to vote. Insane.
You don't pay to vote. You pay to be a member of a party, and then yo uget to participate in that party's internal decisions.
Voting for candidates is free. You don't need to be supported by a big party to get votes. In 2002, the two candidates from the 2 big parties got 36% of all the votes. In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
We also had "primaries" in the Socialist Party in Spain a few years ago. They were only for party members. The PSOE considered opening a register of "sympathisers" but I don't think they ever did.
By the way, why should a primary in the US be restricted by voter registration, and moreover why should people's voter registration be in the election roster? Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
It's not an election, it's just one party choosing its candidate via an internal choice. There are plenty of parties in France, and plenty of candidates to vote for in the presidential election (6 or 7 already announced on the left, for instance).
Using the word "primary" was just a way to make it understandable as a concept, but it's not exactly the same process as in the USA. The roles of the various institutions are just so different form country to country, even (especially) in Europe, that it's hard to compare at times. In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
And I don't think it's strange that only party members in good standing pick a party candidate rather than have "primary election" open to anyone. Some states in the US do that by having a caucus system rather than a primary system. My state used to. In some ways it was better. You actually had to show up at party meetings and stand up and support someone. I'm not sure that they checked to make sure you'd payed your dues though. But I wouldn't have objected if they had.
by Frank Schnittger - May 27 2 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 5 22 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 23 1 comment
by Oui - May 13 64 comments
by Carrie - Apr 30 7 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 272 comments
by Oui - May 2712 comments
by Oui - May 24
by Frank Schnittger - May 231 comment
by Oui - May 1364 comments
by Oui - May 910 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 522 comments
by Oui - May 449 comments
by Oui - May 312 comments
by Oui - May 29 comments
by gmoke - May 1
by Oui - Apr 30256 comments
by Carrie - Apr 307 comments
by Oui - Apr 2644 comments
by Oui - Apr 879 comments
by Oui - Mar 19143 comments