The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The Simpsons are on Fox, is what I mean.
But we are separated geographically. So the meta-game for us is linguistic in the first instance, hence the "magazine" appearance of ET: writing words in such a way that they have effects in the world...word magic. I think building up a discourse around sustainability...what does it mean, what do we all HAVE to do if we are activists towards a sustainable Europe? (That's where I see the focus.)
So changing the game is changing the use and focus of language. We all post for different reasons, but if there is a focus on...well...I'd say a focus on getting away from the moneyman intermediary. Not that abstract exchange value (etc.. Chris/Jerome, I bow etc...)..ya know, money is sometimes useful and often necessary. But if my power if free, my food grows around me, my house is well insulated against excess heat/cold...and I have access to the latest information...the latest wisdom...
Not sure I'm helping here, but I think as Sven says, the game starts with our own intentions, desires...our own ability to step outside of our various boxes, take a look around...
(Sven can explain how us not having a homunculus affects this ;) Don't fight forces, use them R. Buckminster Fuller.
On Radio 4 this morning, the 8:10 topic was Nuclear Fusion. The conversation was between an expert from (I think) California and (in the "reactionary" postion) a guy from Friends of the Earth. The conversation went something like this.
Nuclear Guy: The technology isn't there yet, but we're working towards it.
Friend of the Earth Guy: The timescales are too long; we need to invest in renewables now.
Nuclear Guy: I agree. We have our funding (From the U.S., Europe, Russia, India, and China) to build and run an experimental fusion reactor. I also think we should invest in renewables now.
The individual...you have to start somewhere--with yourself? But individuals live in groups...they aren't found in isolation. That mix of group and individual...the stones on the Go board...the particle/wave strangeness...I think they're all connected. I think there is a way to map our knowledge of the intimacies of nature ("outside"?) to the human situation ("inside"?) I cannae do it because I know too little about the "outside" part...but I think mapping across, using the knowledge to greatest effect...
Therefore when an army is headstrong, it will lose in a battle. When a tree is hard, it will be cut down. The big and strong belong underneath. The gentle and weak belong at the top.
I don't think this is mumbo nonsense, I think it is another attempt to...to eff the ineffable, as melo put it. Yet if this is indeed how nature works, then we can update 2000+ year old attempts at talking to the human condition with our latest knowledge...
For me, these are all means, if used correctly, to closing the gap between self and other, between individual and community...but I'm too dim to make the connections (as my Go playing demonstrates!)
And I may have wandered off topic (moi? ;) so ignore, move on, I just wanted to say something along these lines to try and clarify my thinking somewhat--I thank ET for the space to do so! Don't fight forces, use them R. Buckminster Fuller.
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 17
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 10 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 1 6 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 3 32 comments
by Oui - Sep 6 3 comments
by gmoke - Aug 25 1 comment
by Oui - Sep 18
by Oui - Sep 1713 comments
by Oui - Sep 154 comments
by Oui - Sep 151 comment
by Oui - Sep 1315 comments
by Oui - Sep 13
by Oui - Sep 124 comments
by Oui - Sep 1010 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 103 comments
by Oui - Sep 10
by Oui - Sep 92 comments
by Oui - Sep 84 comments
by Oui - Sep 715 comments
by Oui - Sep 72 comments
by Oui - Sep 63 comments
by Oui - Sep 54 comments
by gmoke - Sep 5