The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Notice that the press and politicians see this as a problem with not having enough workers to make "stuff". What is it going to take to get people to realize that this is an opportunity to transform society into one less dependent on non-renewable resources?
What is it going to take to get people to realize that this is an opportunity to transform society into one less dependent on non-renewable resources?
Any people in areas where these demographic changes are happening interested in making some remarks on how things are changing?
This is exactly the problem, the elites continue to think of the people as cannon fodder or cheap unqualified labour. With a declining, more experienced population (where people over the age of 60 won't be "elderly" but active) you can improve the standard of living even if GDP stops growing.
I was having a discussion with friends last night about the US. In the US, there's a significant group that has sufficient private pension funds to retire, but is unable to because they are unable to get health coverage.
I would love to see the universal coverage that Americans over 65 are now eligible for (Medicare) expanded on a pay for play basis to those who are 55 and over. Doing that could remove a large number of employees who have delayed retirement plans and have blocked the upward mobility of younger workers, that in turn would shrink the labor supply. And we know that where the supply of labor is reduced and demand is constant, one of two things will happen. Either wages will increase, or employers will substitute capital investement for labor..
That I believe is one vital distiction between Europe and America. In Europe where the relative minimum wage is higher inefficient positions have been eliminated and employers either substitute captial (ie machines) for labor, or invest in human capital (ie education) to make their workers more productive. In the end both employer and employee survive the better for it.
In particular, the cheap labor conservatives deny America the full use of its investment in human capital because the capital investments to create skilled positions that are more productive doesn't exist when employers can cheat and pay their workers less than they are worth through market manipulation (ie encouraging workers with no legal right who ae supsectible to private coercion to emigrate without permit.)
As for the aging of Spain, right now would be a good time to invest in nursing homes (aka old age homes) The force at work here is gender equality, as women leave the home for the workplace they can no longer care for the grandparents. So first, families try to do at home with a nurse, and then later they end up in a state or church run facility. The question for the long term is whether the provinces will create nursing homes, or whether they will leave that to the private sector. With the federal nature of healthcare in Spain you could see a patchwork arise. And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg
by Oui - Dec 5 9 comments
by gmoke - Nov 28
by Oui - Dec 9
by Oui - Dec 95 comments
by Oui - Dec 815 comments
by Oui - Dec 620 comments
by Oui - Dec 612 comments
by Oui - Dec 59 comments
by Oui - Dec 44 comments
by Oui - Dec 21 comment
by Oui - Dec 168 comments
by Oui - Dec 16 comments
by gmoke - Nov 303 comments
by Oui - Nov 3012 comments
by Oui - Nov 2838 comments
by Oui - Nov 2713 comments
by Oui - Nov 2511 comments
by Oui - Nov 243 comments
by Oui - Nov 221 comment
by Oui - Nov 22
by Oui - Nov 2119 comments