The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
It amounts to self-serving self-suggestion: keep on spending money (to our profit) you don't have, all will be well. In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
It amounts to self-serving self-suggestion: keep on spending money (to our profit) you don't have, all will be well.
The facts don't matter, only consumer and investor confidence matter.
And those investors, CEO's who call the trends correctly, are invariably the winners.
It's about understanding reality,,,,,it always has been--IMHO.
Is it because of the fundamentals, or because whether the landing is soft or hard depends on some sort of consensus? Can a consensus of opinion drive the fundamentals? That is basically what I meant by The facts don't matter, only consumer and investor confidence matter, which is a facetiously naarrow rendering of Keynes, by the way. Those whom the Gods wish to destroy They first make mad. -- Euripides
A simple example, let's say I own the Coco Cola Company and you want to buy it. I look at my sales and profit projections and calculate NPV's, risks, etc, and I think the value of the company and its future earning stream is $10 billion. And I think that basically because I see sales growth at 3%. you do the same analysis and think that young people in China are going to go crazy over coke, and you use all the same numbers I do to calculate value, except that you see sales growing at 15% per year--you value the company at $20 billion. So you offer me $12, I take it thinking you are a fool. Some say we have different perceptions--perhaps true right now today. But 2 years down the road, sales have grown 15%, not 3%, you are a genius and have a company that can likely be sold for your $20 billion.
Both of us had an understanding of the current reality, but you understood a trend better than I, and you capitalized on it. The consensus of opinion was likely with me, the owner of the business. sales had been growing 3% per year for years, why should it change? You went against my opinion and the consensus, and you were right. The winner often bets against the consensus of opinion. he may look wrong in the present period,,,,but in time the trends play out, and we see who was right.
Often the best way to make money is to bet against the consensus. When people are so depressed about a falling stock price that it's hard to get anyone to buy the shares you hold, that often means prices have fallen to rock bottom, and the market is very undervalued. If you can see that moment, and act on it, fortunes can be made.
Obviously a very simple example holding all kinds of variables constant, which economists love to do.
I'm interested in how corporate earnings can be packaged and/or sold BEFORE the management gets its hands on them.
The entire Canadian Capital market has gone down this road - through the "Income Trust" phenomenon - which demonstrates quite how attractive such a "pre-distributive" model is to investors, particularly pension funds.
My thesis is that a "Capital Partnership" - ie the selling of proportional shares (through a partnership between "Capital User" and Investor in LLP or LLC vehicles) in revenues or production - is possibly an optimal asset class.
And of course, the valuation of such "Equity Shares" - as I call them for want of anything better - is entirely in line with the approach you set out with such clarity. "The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson
I don't know the Canadian tax laws, but it appears that the vehicle allows the penalty of double taxation to be avoided. That would be a very large benefit, if the tax rates on corporations, and then a second tax on distributions to shareholders in Canada are particularly high. This double taxation is a foolish idea in a capitalist system, imho, because it just creates unintended consequences, in the sense that corporations take other alternatives to avoid this double taxation. Unfortunately, to those that react to sound bites on the news (rather than understanding the economics), something like "only the rich get dividends, so they should pay high taxes on their dividends" is very appealing. But right now, in the US, we have lowered taxes on dividends to 15%, rather than taxing them at the higher ordinary income tax rates. So though it is still a problem, it is less so,,,and corporations are starting to pay dividends at higher levels now.
I'm hoping to go through your diary, which looks very interesting, but I need some time to spend on it. I started, but it requires some thought--ie. is not a quick read. So I'm putting it off until I can spend some time with it, and absorb it. Thanks for writing it.
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 2 1 comment
by Oui - Nov 26 56 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 30 4 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 23 17 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 20 20 comments
by epochepoque - Nov 16 32 comments
by gmoke - Nov 15
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 13 43 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 21 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 304 comments
by Oui - Nov 2656 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 2317 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 2020 comments
by epochepoque - Nov 1632 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 1343 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 9125 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 5139 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 3215 comments