Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
I'll leave the issues of "used financial assets", "real" assets to the text books.  When does a company like Intel, originally a small company developing and manufacturing products, turn from a "real" company into a "used financial asset".  Today's Intel still develops and manufacutes products--is it a "used fiancial asset" because it is a publicly traded company, or because it is big?  It seems to do the same things, only on bigger scale.  And it has chosen to be a public company so ownership can be diversified to the public, and so it can raise money to grow more quickly and easily.  
by wchurchill on Mon Dec 4th, 2006 at 03:36:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
You'd be best off dusting off one of those textbooks. The majority of financial transactions in share markets are sales of existing stock, and are not new equity investment into the company.

New equity investment into the company is investment in real assets, precisely when it is used to acquire real assets.

However, most "investment" does not finance the acquisition of new real assets ... most nets out inside the financial sector, with a holder of a financial assets swapping with a holder of money: neither an increase in financial assets nor an increase in liquidity, just a change in the distribution of an existing stock.

These are all neoliberal fantasies, repeated to provide ideological cover for the "promotion of saving", and to distract attention from the fact that on average, those that have money to save have more money than those that do not have money to save, and that "inducements to save" are a fancy way of saying welfare for the rich.

The Japanese acquire the services of very clever people to perform their financial capital allocation, just as the pommies and we yanks acquire the service of very clever people to perform our financial capital allocation. However, rather than paying them a slice off the top of the sums they are managing, they pay them a comfortable upper middle class income working in a Ministry, and they get that clever capital allocation for a small fraction of the cost that we pay for a casino system that allocates capital with a minority of its time and effort.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Mon Dec 4th, 2006 at 05:26:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series