The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Another brilliant contribution to the advancement of civil dialogue.
Shouldn't it be me that feeling offended by your response? After all, you said that my comment was drying some well... and was not civil.
If you are honest, point out ONE reference in my original comment that lacked civility. One instance that I used anything but facts.
Did you disagree? Make your case. You disagreed with two consecutive posts without offering any counterarguments. At least explain what in particular offends you. We may come to agree or disagree which is what dialogue is supposed to do.
After calling me a child, you then proceeded to repeat the original poster's error of over-generalizing. Your words were:
Americans (and not just the govt) are not free of guilt. They've shown repeatedly that it takes but a small effort for them to accept other people as "enemies".
Please note that you did not say "some Americans" or even "most Americans." You said "Americans."
In your third post, you asked if I failed to understand what you wrote. No, in fact, it appears to be you who failed to understand what you wrote.
In short: I was objecting to the original poster's choice of words, not to the sentiment that she was expressing. You jumped in with a new set of insults. I then objected to your choice of words, not to the sentiment you were expressing.
You, however, seem awfully eager to believe that I have some problem with people criticizing my country, which would conveniently confirm all of your pre-conceived notions about me.
I can assure you, however, that if that were true, I would not live where I live.
I really suggest at this point that you should move on. There is nothing to be seen here.
You finally posted a coherent (but factually wrong) response but you feel like my side, my arguments do not deserve the same consideration as yours.
I think you just broke a lot of forum etiquete rules and demonstrated that you have little respect for differing opinions.
The only thing you did was ad hominem attacks based on some assumption that you chose to make.
Feel better now?
I wish you the best. Peace.
BTW, I once got a letter published in Newsweek in which I blasted them for generalising language. (And the crooks re-edited some words central to my points.) *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by gmoke - May 16
by gmoke - Apr 22 5 comments
by gmoke - Apr 30
by Oui - May 24
by Oui - May 23
by Oui - May 2123 comments
by Oui - May 2011 comments
by Oui - May 20
by Oui - May 19
by Oui - May 1818 comments
by Oui - May 18
by Oui - May 1717 comments
by Oui - May 15
by Oui - May 1512 comments
by Oui - May 14
by Oui - May 136 comments
by gmoke - May 13
by Oui - May 1326 comments
by Oui - May 12
by Oui - May 119 comments
by Oui - May 111 comment