The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Shouldn't it be me that feeling offended by your response? After all, you said that my comment was drying some well... and was not civil.
If you are honest, point out ONE reference in my original comment that lacked civility. One instance that I used anything but facts.
Did you disagree? Make your case. You disagreed with two consecutive posts without offering any counterarguments. At least explain what in particular offends you. We may come to agree or disagree which is what dialogue is supposed to do.
After calling me a child, you then proceeded to repeat the original poster's error of over-generalizing. Your words were:
Americans (and not just the govt) are not free of guilt. They've shown repeatedly that it takes but a small effort for them to accept other people as "enemies".
Please note that you did not say "some Americans" or even "most Americans." You said "Americans."
In your third post, you asked if I failed to understand what you wrote. No, in fact, it appears to be you who failed to understand what you wrote.
In short: I was objecting to the original poster's choice of words, not to the sentiment that she was expressing. You jumped in with a new set of insults. I then objected to your choice of words, not to the sentiment you were expressing.
You, however, seem awfully eager to believe that I have some problem with people criticizing my country, which would conveniently confirm all of your pre-conceived notions about me.
I can assure you, however, that if that were true, I would not live where I live.
I really suggest at this point that you should move on. There is nothing to be seen here.
You finally posted a coherent (but factually wrong) response but you feel like my side, my arguments do not deserve the same consideration as yours.
I think you just broke a lot of forum etiquete rules and demonstrated that you have little respect for differing opinions.
The only thing you did was ad hominem attacks based on some assumption that you chose to make.
Feel better now?
I wish you the best. Peace.
BTW, I once got a letter published in Newsweek in which I blasted them for generalising language. (And the crooks re-edited some words central to my points.) *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by Oui - Apr 17
by Oui - Apr 161 comment
by Oui - Apr 1612 comments
by Oui - Apr 156 comments
by Oui - Apr 14
by Oui - Apr 145 comments
by Oui - Apr 131 comment
by Oui - Apr 12
by Oui - Apr 112 comments
by Oui - Apr 10
by Oui - Apr 93 comments
by Oui - Apr 91 comment
by Oui - Apr 83 comments
by Oui - Apr 69 comments
by Oui - Apr 6
by Oui - Apr 55 comments
by Oui - Apr 56 comments
by Oui - Apr 43 comments