Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
your last sentence says it all.

You finally posted a coherent (but factually wrong) response but you feel like my side, my arguments do not deserve the same consideration as yours.

I think you just broke a lot of forum etiquete rules and demonstrated that you have little respect for differing opinions.

by Euroliberal on Fri Feb 3rd, 2006 at 11:24:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I have said nothing, not one word, about the opinions expressed by either you or by Gaianne.  I have objected to the fact that you both insist on over-generalizing.  I do not expect that kind of intellectual laziness in this forum.
by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Fri Feb 3rd, 2006 at 11:37:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]
but.... but you never asked me to qualify, clarify or otherwise explain my positions.

The only thing you did was ad hominem attacks based on some assumption that you chose to make.

by Euroliberal on Fri Feb 3rd, 2006 at 12:04:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
OK, fine, be my guest.  Pull up a chair, have a cup of tea, and qualify, clarify or otherwise explain to your heart's content.

Feel better now?

by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Fri Feb 3rd, 2006 at 12:40:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]
thank you anyway.

I wish you the best. Peace.

by Euroliberal on Fri Feb 3rd, 2006 at 01:58:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]
BTW, stormy, the irony of this spat of yours is that Gaianne, who set this off, is American herself.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Fri Feb 3rd, 2006 at 04:32:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
:)  Hehe.  I do realize that....  But Americans don't get a free pass when it comes to making generalizations, even about ourselves.  It doesn't matter if we're from Michigan, Madrid or Mars!
by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Fri Feb 3rd, 2006 at 04:55:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't think she meant to make a generalisation (because I don't think she includes herself in that characterisation of behaviour), just used generalising language, which can be misunderstood all too easily.

BTW, I once got a letter published in Newsweek in which I blasted them for generalising language. (And the crooks re-edited some words central to my points.)

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Fri Feb 3rd, 2006 at 05:16:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I think the media should be taken to task for it a lot more often.  But then, I guess on the list of things we have to complain about regarding the media, that may not even be in the top five...
by the stormy present (stormypresent aaaaaaat gmail etc) on Fri Feb 3rd, 2006 at 06:04:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display: