The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The problem is, of course, that you can read the propaganda of the Iranian side and the IAEA's factual assesments only channelled through sources often sympathetic to the EU-3+US side. Which sets the terms of the debate.
Where did I do that?
Sorry, was cursory reading, I completely messed up. I misread your last sentence in that post as an implicit reference that you know the following info: that the US claims that Iran imported large quantities of beryllium were disproved by IAEA a year ago. That one is in line with a series of over-egged to false claims, but not what you were speaking about.
Regarding what you were speaking about, the yellowcake impurities, worth to read this and this. *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
Which is why I generally go back to the IAEA as the most reliable source... I take their factual assessment any time above the clamour of Iran or the USA.
Thanks for the links to the UF gas. That's indeed the issue I was looking confirmation for. Unfortunately, nothing is "official". Sources are among others anonymous IAEA diplomats - which at least gives it an appearance of credibility.
by gmoke - Jan 27
by Oui - Feb 14
by Oui - Feb 13
by Oui - Feb 12
by Oui - Feb 10
by Oui - Feb 102 comments
by Oui - Feb 93 comments
by Oui - Feb 92 comments
by Oui - Feb 8
by Oui - Feb 81 comment
by Oui - Feb 74 comments
by Oui - Feb 7
by Oui - Feb 6
by Oui - Feb 5
by Oui - Feb 53 comments
by Oui - Feb 4
by Oui - Feb 3
by Oui - Feb 12 comments