The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Fashionable talk of a "European culture" is pointless and may even be damaging Ideals animate every endeavour worth its salt. Robert Musil, an Austrian novelist at the turn of the 20th century, wrote that each of us has a second country in which everything we do is innocent. For Americans, that second country is an idealised America, where every child can become president and through which runs the yellow brick road. In European nations, Europe is that second country. When Franco's dictatorship fell, Spaniards shouted in the streets that "we are Europeans now." To peoples little affected by the appeals of God or country, the EU has become (to borrow a favourite phrase of Senator John McCain), "a cause greater than themselves". But European leaders now want to go beyond idealism to assert particular qualities of Europeanness and make specific arguments about the EU. (...) It is true that, compared with Americans, Europeans spend much time thinking of, talking about and subsidising their high culture. But this does not mean they are inspired by it. Like the rest of the world, Europeans' cultural references are at least as populist and American--"Desperate Housewives", "Temptation Island"--as they are high-minded and European. Proxy measures of creativity, such as patent awards, the quality of universities, the numbers of films and videos, are all strongly in America's favour. It seems extremely unlikely that cultural vitality will somehow renew European ideals about the EU. For too many, it is America that is creative and exciting, not Europe. Even if Europe were more stirring than it is, this would still not impinge on the EU one way or the other. (...) At best, talking about culture is a distraction from the harder task of economic reform. It could also become an insidious way of stopping Turkey from joining the EU (Turkey might meet the formal conditions of entry but not count as culturally European). (...) Worst of all, talk of Europe's cultural distinctiveness can be a way of attacking globalisation.
Ideals animate every endeavour worth its salt. Robert Musil, an Austrian novelist at the turn of the 20th century, wrote that each of us has a second country in which everything we do is innocent. For Americans, that second country is an idealised America, where every child can become president and through which runs the yellow brick road. In European nations, Europe is that second country. When Franco's dictatorship fell, Spaniards shouted in the streets that "we are Europeans now." To peoples little affected by the appeals of God or country, the EU has become (to borrow a favourite phrase of Senator John McCain), "a cause greater than themselves".
But European leaders now want to go beyond idealism to assert particular qualities of Europeanness and make specific arguments about the EU.
(...)
It is true that, compared with Americans, Europeans spend much time thinking of, talking about and subsidising their high culture. But this does not mean they are inspired by it. Like the rest of the world, Europeans' cultural references are at least as populist and American--"Desperate Housewives", "Temptation Island"--as they are high-minded and European. Proxy measures of creativity, such as patent awards, the quality of universities, the numbers of films and videos, are all strongly in America's favour. It seems extremely unlikely that cultural vitality will somehow renew European ideals about the EU. For too many, it is America that is creative and exciting, not Europe.
Even if Europe were more stirring than it is, this would still not impinge on the EU one way or the other.
At best, talking about culture is a distraction from the harder task of economic reform. It could also become an insidious way of stopping Turkey from joining the EU (Turkey might meet the formal conditions of entry but not count as culturally European).
Worst of all, talk of Europe's cultural distinctiveness can be a way of attacking globalisation.
But Europe has its myth. Maybe it does not talk to you in Ireland, but it does work here on the continent: Europe is the reconciliation of France and Germany (and the relief of those squeezed in the middle). The problem of Europe is that it has brought in members that have not accepted this idea of reconciliation, and see intra-European stuff as a continuation of old fights in a new way. In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
Since attacking globalisation would be... a bad thing? Say hello, flat earth.
This doesn't help in stimulating me to pick an issue of The Economist...
Sure, the US dominates TV and movie output, but that is in part an artifact of language and economic circumstance. However, in the end, US programs are a certain kind of escapism. They represent fundamentally different things abroad than they do in the US.
(There is a diary hiding in this concept, but perhaps kcurie or someone is better qualified to write it than I?)
I really think the Economist is in danger of losing it's identity as an international magazine. It begins to sound more like a US magazine every day.
Action movies are not "culture", they are "entertainment". McDonalds is not culture, it's energy supply management (the unsustainable kind, of course). In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
About the only time I eat at a McDonald's is while travelling - desperate need for food, any food and little choice or desperate need for a bathroom and figuring I might as well eat something while I'm at it. As a result, most of my McDo spending comes in Europe and I believe I have never eaten at one in NYC (pizza and falafel shops serve the first requirement, Starbucks and other cafes the second one).
Not that I'm a junkfood-junkie anyway. After a youth of seeing a visit to MacDonalds or equivalent as something rare and special (probably the best way to start off), I've been phasing out, maximally visiting once a year, just to re-discover that teenage experience when the Mac was a shiny, exciting something. But when that shine wears off and you start tasting the food... MacDonalds can be a phase. I think Europeans have an advantage in this: they've a history with demanding high quality food.
But Europe has its myth. Maybe it does not talk to you in Ireland, but it does work here on the continent: Europe is the reconciliation of France and Germany (and the relief of those squeezed in the middle). The problem of Europe is that it has brought in members that have not accepted this idea of reconciliation, and see intra-European stuff as a continuation of old fights in a new way.
Not to mention that as generations go on, the war loses some of it's old mythical symbolic meaning. It will mean something different to kids born today, so it is perhaps an imperfect myth going forward.
For others, be it the UK, Ireland or Spain or Portugal it's logical to see there needs to be something more inclusive, more involving, I think.
But would you agree that thea "myth" that is German-French reconciliation is probably less compelling outside France and Germany?
And "avoiding the wars of the past" is probably less compelling for younger generations?
(My grandparents lived through WW2, but my youngest niece never knew them, so how can it have the same resonance for her?)
As to whether or not the myth should be "self-selling" ideally it would be, but it's hard to think of one that really is, anywhere...
I won't hazard to make a general point about my generation, but at least will mention one counter-trend: my generation has a renewed attention for just those personal stories of their WWII-surviving grandparents that our parents didn't have. The stories told can be manifold, but the not-heard-before horrors survived by a close relative could be the part making the most impression. (At least it is for me.) *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
When I was young, some 50% of movies made in the 20 years preceding my birth seemed to be war movies. I think this has changed also.
WW2 is not gone from our culture, but it is fading and changing. Anyway, perhaps this is a diary topic if I get time.
WW2 is not gone from our culture, but it is fading and changing.
And that's sad, because, personally, I've always found WWII to be the most interesting event in history. I love listening to my grandfather's stories from the South-Pacific. ("Once a Marine, always a Marine," as our family always jokes.) The battles of Britain and Stalingrad are two of my favorites -- the former being arguably the most critical battle of the war, as far as US involvement is concerned -- though I always have trouble finding decent books on the two. Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 18 16 comments
by gmoke - Jan 13 9 comments
by gmoke - Dec 22
by Oui - Feb 7
by Oui - Feb 6
by Oui - Feb 5
by Oui - Feb 52 comments
by Oui - Feb 4
by Oui - Feb 3
by Oui - Feb 1
by Oui - Jan 31
by Oui - Jan 30
by Oui - Jan 29
by Oui - Jan 28
by Oui - Jan 281 comment
by gmoke - Jan 27
by Oui - Jan 27