Well, we have come full circle. A couple of days back Kcurie mentioned the case of a computer programmer who had been indicted for creating a game where the goal was to shoot at Easter processions. Here is a news story (in Spanish) from last September, when the trial was about to take place. (I managed to find an English story after composing this message)

The game in question was called Matanza Cofrade (Brotherhood Massacre) and in it the cofrades (members of Easter Brotherhoods) of three major Sevilla brotherhoods were replaced by zombies which had to be shot. The three powerful brotherhoods sued him for trademark violation (as the game used the trademarked emblems of the brotherhoods without permission) and "offending the religious feelings of a group by scorn of their ceremonies". The prosecution asked for 1 year imprisonment (for trademark violation) and a nearly €8000 fine.

According to the Spanish Wikipedia article on Matanza Cofrade,

charges were dropped when the author apologized to those he might have offended, asserting that "it was just a game". The public prosecutor stated that the deeds did not "fulfil all necessary conditions" as "there had not been a sufficient degree of trademark or product confusion". The judge, in her turn, issued a "not guilty" sentence..

So, that was that. In the Spanish news item linked above, it says that the programmer declared to the Guardia Civil (presumably as the complaint was first investigated) that he "acted without malice" and "didn't make any money" off the game.

A society committed to the notion that government is always bad will have bad government. And it doesn't have to be that way. — Paul Krugman

You do realize this comment of yours could be used as evidence to throw out the case?

A society committed to the notion that government is always bad will have bad government. And it doesn't have to be that way. — Paul Krugman