The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Yes, you are. You started of by commenting my comment and that is fair enough, after all that is why we are here to exchange views.
You should really do some research before making statements like this one:
After all it ought to be possible to start a process of democratic reforms gradually while at the same time being able to uphold law and order. This has been done in the former eastern-block countries and ought to be possible in Russia even if it means reforms at a slower pace.
You don't need to abolish the right to election in order to get to the mafia you just have to beef up the justice system by employing more lawyers and introduce legislation that secures transparency. One possibility is to set up a directorate that audits and control the regions and their economical and political system and introduce criteria's that ensures the candidates elect ability like no double income, to business interests while in office, no favouring of business contracts and the likes. There is no guarantee at all that the appointments will not include mafia people as you are well aware of the Soviet apparatchik and the business mafia are very much infiltrated and often feed off each other.
There was, in my view, no need to tighten the control on the media either, he could have started an investigation, which he did, into the business dealings of the oligarchs and used anti-trust legislation to split the media conglomerate thus ensuring that there no domination of the media sector by a few powerful people that is perfectly legal and are being done when needed in most democratic countries, see the split of the Standard oil company in the US.
This statement leads me to believe you "get" it:
In case you haven't noticed, I understand the process in Russia quite well thank you and that is why I can debate you on this issue. We are just not in total agreement over the democratic process going on in Russia.
What is worth noting though is that some people tend to get all emotional when their country is debated. I can understand that if it had been slander and done in an abusive language but when it's done rationally and in a civil manner I shouldn't be to hard engaging in a debate based on facts and rational opinions.
As I have said before it is perfectly possible to continue the process of democratic reform and at the same time uphold law and order. In stead of shutting down democratic processes Putin could and indeed should use the legislation more because this is plausible and needed, but within the framework of the constitution and according to rule of law and not according to personal preferences.
I do think that Russia have to change gradually while at the same time not roll back the democratic process.
Bitsofnews.com Giving you the latest bits.
by Oui - Sep 24 4 comments
by gmoke - Sep 24
by Cat - Sep 19 28 comments
by IdiotSavant - Sep 15 13 comments
by Oui - Sep 20 30 comments
by IdiotSavant - Sep 16 10 comments
by gmoke - Sep 12
by gmoke - Sep 5 14 comments
by Oui - Sep 244 comments
by gmoke - Sep 24
by Oui - Sep 238 comments
by Oui - Sep 22
by Oui - Sep 2030 comments
by Cat - Sep 1928 comments
by gmoke - Sep 19
by Oui - Sep 183 comments
by Oui - Sep 1615 comments
by IdiotSavant - Sep 1610 comments
by Oui - Sep 1524 comments
by Oui - Sep 159 comments
by IdiotSavant - Sep 1513 comments
by Oui - Sep 1420 comments
by Oui - Sep 149 comments
by Oui - Sep 1319 comments
by gmoke - Sep 12
by Oui - Sep 916 comments
by gmoke - Sep 514 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 211 comments