The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
He makes the following points: The roots of the European unemployment problem lie in the productivity slowdown and commodity price inflation of the 1970s. The rise in unemployment led to changes in government policy to protect workers -- more employment protection and more generous unemployment insurance. In the 1980s, the unemployment problem was compounded by declining business profits and investment, which reduced labor demand, and conflicts between "insiders" and "outsiders" in the labor market. Most countries have partially reversed the labor market policy changes of the 1970s, but only partially, and sometimes with perverse consequences. European labor market institutions are still less employment friendly than they were prior to the 1970s. National differences in institutions matter. Countries with well-developed institutions of social partnership, including centralized government-business-labor wage bargaining, seem to have done better than others.
It's not like you are ever going to be able to "prove" these things to everybody's full satisfaction anyway. This is not rocket science. It's harder.
The question is, are the conclusions plausible, and can we make reasonably rational policy recommendations from them? I think so.
In fact, the policy recommendations he comes to -- basically coordinated expansionary fiscal, monetary, and incomes policy -- do not seem all that far off from what the Alternative Economic Policy for Europe people are arguing for.
Blanchard would add some job-friendly institutional reforms of employment regulations, unemployment insurance, and so forth.
It seems like these could be the seeds of a traditional European business-labor-government grand bargain that mobilizes the whole society to combat unemployment.
Business would get some regulatory relief and wage restraint; workers would get guarantees from the government to create more jobs with macroeconomic policy and public sector employment, and active labor market policy to ease insecurity caused by the deregulation.
All negotiated among the social partners rather than imposed from the top, of course.
Sorry, I try to be very careful to be precise about how reliable things like that are.
As for your other diary: I never read it properly as I wasn't well. My loss. I'll have to read it now.
And now I'm taking a break: I cannot believe I just constructed that sentence.
by gmoke - Jan 27
by Oui - Feb 14
by Oui - Feb 13
by Oui - Feb 12
by Oui - Feb 10
by Oui - Feb 102 comments
by Oui - Feb 93 comments
by Oui - Feb 92 comments
by Oui - Feb 8
by Oui - Feb 81 comment
by Oui - Feb 74 comments
by Oui - Feb 7
by Oui - Feb 6
by Oui - Feb 5
by Oui - Feb 53 comments
by Oui - Feb 4
by Oui - Feb 3
by Oui - Feb 12 comments