The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Now, of course, those issues are back.
So I guess the answer is yes and no. Certainly resource supplies are a constraint on living standards, but the constraint is not always binding. Or, maybe it's better to say that the binding is looser at some times and tighter at others. Resource supplies, at least in the short term, were just not an issue in the 1980s (when oil prices fell well below their 1970s levels) and 1990s.
Will Blancahrd's recommendations head off the impact of the next oil shock?
Maybe I'm just too tired right now, but it's not clear to me that his ideas explain how to deal with an oil shock whilst it is happening, (rather than after it is done with) and yet everything Jerome posts points to an "expensive-energy" future at the moment.
One answer to this, as Blanchard points out, is that if one set of costs (say resource costs) are rising, other costs have to be stabilized if employment levels are to be preserved.
This can mean "incomes policy," where business, labor, and government get together to make sure that wage deals do not exacerbate inflation. Countries such as Germany that had this kind of system in place got through the 1970s better than countries that didn't, like Britain for example.
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 18 16 comments
by gmoke - Jan 13 9 comments
by gmoke - Dec 22
by Oui - Feb 102 comments
by Oui - Feb 93 comments
by Oui - Feb 92 comments
by Oui - Feb 8
by Oui - Feb 81 comment
by Oui - Feb 74 comments
by Oui - Feb 7
by Oui - Feb 6
by Oui - Feb 5
by Oui - Feb 53 comments
by Oui - Feb 4
by Oui - Feb 3
by Oui - Feb 12 comments
by Oui - Feb 1
by Oui - Jan 31
by Oui - Jan 30
by Oui - Jan 29