Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Initial reaction: Air is no fuel! So I had to go read the article. :)

Two things that stuck out:

  1. It is built in fibreglass to be very light. Good thing, but is really a seperate issue from the engine.

  2. It runs on compressed air, which might be a better form of storing energy then a battery (I really do not know) but just as batteries or fuelcells it moves the energy 'production' from the car to another place. In itself probably a good thing, but that other place needs to be included in the energy calculation.


Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
by A swedish kind of death on Fri Mar 31st, 2006 at 07:04:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The Air Car's engine runs on expansion not combustion. Unlike fuel cells, compressed air is not stored in a toxic environment so already it is more environmentally friendly than batteries. Also, the Air Car uses very little energy to refill itself. From the site:

The car's air tanks will be refilled thanks to the engine working in compressor mode. This will take about six hours. Otherwise the tanks can be refilled with high pressure in three minutes at an air station. The cost of refueling with the generator will be approximately 1.5 Euros.

Okay, it's going to cost more running the engine in compressor mode plugged into an adaptor at home, but no more than running your computer or TV (and a lot less than running an electric car or a hybrid).

Perhaps we have gone in the wrong direction with combustion engines. Why pay for fuel when air itself creates no pollution and is as free as ... the air?

A stylish French solution to a large part of our global pollution problem.


"When men yield up the privilege of thinking, the last shadow of liberty quits the horizon." Thomas Paine

by Noel Guinane (noel at bloodandtreasure.com) on Fri Mar 31st, 2006 at 10:29:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In terms of hysteresis, compressed air is definitely a better way to store energy than a battery.

But I'd have to do some calculations on the energy density, plus high-pressure gas is harder to control than a liquid or solid fuel tank or battery... except that in the case of a leak it's less dangerous.

A society committed to the notion that government is always bad will have bad government. And it doesn't have to be that way. — Paul Krugman

by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Mar 31st, 2006 at 10:33:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's a fair point and one they gave much consideration to with the result that they use the same tanks used by buses in Germany that run on natural gas which is highly explosive and needs to be carefully controlled coming out of the tank. Air of course is not.

"When men yield up the privilege of thinking, the last shadow of liberty quits the horizon." Thomas Paine
by Noel Guinane (noel at bloodandtreasure.com) on Fri Mar 31st, 2006 at 04:10:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series