The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
It really is a hit piece. One thing that struck me was how she uses the concept of "world": It is a world..., in this world, etc, like when the media is taking us for a trip to some really weird place which totally differs from anything normal and comfortably well-known. Of course it's a distorting device here, to accentuate a supposed huge difference between France and the rest of the Western world that doesn't in fact exist.
Oh, of course, France is stranded in some time warp from way back in an epoch when, would you believe it, people practised Keynesian economics, oh the humanity! The fact that both the UK and the US (you know, the tomorrow's world countries) have recently gone in for a considerable amount of Keynesianism (861,000 public-sector jobs created in the UK under New Labour, continual increase in public spending under Bush) just flies under the radar.
The killer factoid to prove the difference is, as usual, the poll in which the French only scored 36% when they should have scored at least 60% to be members of today's human race. That poll has been constantly quoted since The Economist put it into their leader the other week (see brunoken's diary here.) Three things I think about the poll (by GlobeScan and the Program on International Policy Attitudes of the University of Maryland, Jan 2006. Link here) :
The director of political analysis for the study said this:
Steven Kull, director of PIPA, comments: "In one sense we are indeed facing what has been called `the end of history,' in that there is now an extraordinary level of consensus about the best economic system. But this is not the victory of one side of the dialectic. While there is overwhelming support for free markets, there is also near-unanimous rejection of unbridled capitalism, with people around the world overwhelmingly favoring greater government regulation of large companies and more protection of workers and consumers."
Now, I don't see how this can be, if people are getting their economic education right and proper as they should -- not like those pesky French... ;)
I had some questions about the polling too, but now I'm invited out to brunch and have to leave. In any event, this article makes so many dubious assumptions that it's hard to know where to start.
Off to brunch...
by Oui - Jun 30 14 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 24 16 comments
by Oui - Jun 25 43 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 16 15 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 15 14 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 10 15 comments
by Bernard - Jun 6 23 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 6 4 comments
by gmoke - Jul 2
by Oui - Jun 3014 comments
by Oui - Jun 30
by Oui - Jun 296 comments
by Oui - Jun 2727 comments
by Oui - Jun 2543 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 2416 comments
by Oui - Jun 2310 comments
by Oui - Jun 23
by gmoke - Jun 22
by Oui - Jun 20
by Oui - Jun 1916 comments
by asdf - Jun 184 comments
by Oui - Jun 184 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 1615 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 1514 comments
by Oui - Jun 1311 comments
by Oui - Jun 1240 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 1015 comments
by Oui - Jun 95 comments