Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Lovely!!!

But it does not contradict the principle of Mediocitry.. our universe does not have to be unique..and the fact that it is personal doe snot make it special... actually I can not know anything about a universe beyond the one a I perceive.. so this is the one we ca deal with...

SO either you think it has some existence independent of us and maths exists (our description exists independently...and we will eventually get to discover the maths that really describe the stuff out there... description and reality are the same...and both maths).. or we just describe what we see...wnever knowing really waht is going on....being among the many possible unvierses...our universe.. our description... our myths...existence is myths...our narrative of the world and ourselves exists...because they are narratives.. not because they are maths...

So time is a math variable or a myth....lately I ahve been thinking...and I can not join them in a single entity...time is out there or time is in the interface...a reality or a description...

a quark.. a real quantum field....or narrative that behaves as a quantum field.... the never ending question.....

reality is out there or at the interface...I do not see any other option....which one? I do not take bets.

A pleasure

A pleasure

I therefore claim to show, not how men think in myths, but how myths operate in men's minds without their being aware of the fact. Levi-Strauss, Claude

by kcurie on Sun May 28th, 2006 at 12:19:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]
lol, you sound like you eat the wrong mushrooms!

seriously, i think your post was lovely...it left everything in a deliciously aesthetic soft focus....myth and/or math, observer and/event....

peering over the edge of consensus reality has this enchanting effect on people sometimes, powerfully endearing...

like we're realising we may never know the answers to the so-called ultimate questions, that it's profoundly ok not to know everything, and may possibly be a blessing sometimes...

the best plots develop slowly

the mind tickles for knowledge like lungs breathe for air, and just like in permaculture, the most interesting and productive zones are at the edges.

great reply from sven below, as well.

well done migeru, for creating such a great tit of a thread.

'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Sun May 28th, 2006 at 01:24:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]
 these are not logically mutually exclusive:


 "SO either

 you think it has some existence independent of us and maths exists (our description exists independently...and we will eventually get to discover the maths that really describe the stuff out there... description and reality are the same...and both maths)..

or

we just describe what we see...never knowing really what is going on....

 We can at the same time hold that

existence is independent of "us"

and also

that "we just describe what we see...never knowing really what is going on...."

"In such an environment it is not surprising that the ills of technology should seem curable only through the application of more technology..." John W Aldridge

by proximity1 on Sun May 28th, 2006 at 01:34:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]
PRoximity.. love it.

I exactly thought this way for a long time...

but when I finished physics I realized that there was a strong connection... we change whatever we perceive as we measure. The universe .. the way we describe takes a loop form ..we can not explain what we see without making reference to someone measuring and something measured...physics links extremelly one with the other...universe can not be independent form us..so only the two options remained.

I came to the conclusion that if our present narrative of the world indeed is right and it has no self-contradictions.. then it is purely a narrative or is purely the reality...

So I convinced myself that independence+description  was not possible...may be I am wrong...I could certainly be wrong..Actually, new discoveries could change the narrative indeed.. and we could come back to have an independent universe and a narrative about it...As you may know some people are trying hard.

A pleasure

I therefore claim to show, not how men think in myths, but how myths operate in men's minds without their being aware of the fact. Levi-Strauss, Claude

by kcurie on Mon May 29th, 2006 at 10:03:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]

  "...So I convinced myself ..."

  Precisely.

  I remain to be convinced, however.

  By the way, your restatment of my views and your rebuttals offered show me that despite your claim:

  "I exactly thought this way for a long time..."

  you haven't in fact understood my point.

   To understand just how and why you've missed my point, I can only refer you to either ThatBritGuy or Migeru, who shall be better able to explain it than I.

"In such an environment it is not surprising that the ills of technology should seem curable only through the application of more technology..." John W Aldridge

by proximity1 on Mon May 29th, 2006 at 10:21:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You're going to have to explain it to me first, before I can relay it to kcurie. We need another ET meetup pronto! [Sorry, really can't make it to Toulouse]

A society committed to the notion that government is always bad will have bad government. And it doesn't have to be that way. — Paul Krugman
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue May 30th, 2006 at 04:51:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series