Yes, that's why I didn't claim you actually made that claim, only that it can be read thus.

As long as the debate is on "what to build" (supply-side issues rather than demande side issues) and that wind is not seen as a reliable (nor, by many, cheap) baseload source, then politicians and utilities will choose between coal and nuclear.

That unnecessarily and unfairly constrains the debate to the narrowness of most politicians' views about wind power and load distribution today.

_{*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.}