Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Breeder reactors would extend the amount of useful fuel by (probably) about 100 years. It's not on the table for fear that it can be diverted to weapons use.

This is a stupid reason, we already have enough loose nukes that if this were a serious concern this problem would have been taken care of already.

Policies not Politics
---- Daily Landscape

by rdf (robert.feinman@gmail.com) on Wed Jun 7th, 2006 at 07:38:13 PM EST
I don't see the logic of your second paragraph. Weapons production at present is nowhere near as widespread as breeder reactors would have to be to play a significant role in supplying global energy needs.

There are other concerns with breeders BTW. I long owe a diary on new reactor types (but again abadoned it last weekend seeing Jérôme's darkened mood).

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Thu Jun 8th, 2006 at 03:18:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Oh, and for the benefit of the pro-nuclear folks here, breeders would in theory extend the time a lot more than 100 years.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Thu Jun 8th, 2006 at 03:19:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series