The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
it'd be fun to do something like this in europe too!
if the energy policy is an 800 pound gorilla, then an awakened and activated public is surely an 8000 pound one.
iraq runup sure brought out a lot of people.
plan 9, i respect your tenacity and conviction, but why do you assume we can nuke-power our way to anything sustainable?
it may only take up a square mile or so, but what about the high--security that will have to encircle it, complete with sinister night-time deliveries and thug-goon armies?
even if the alternative is 40 sq miles per equivalent output, you could have park or farmland underneath, no need for draconian security, NO POLLUTION, and no fears for our children!
so if you think of the QUALITITIVE factors, how can you argue for a solution that only solves the problem QUANTITIVELY, and actually only pretends to, as there are no insurance companies that will touch this industry, and the hidden costs of security, downwind health problems, and good land being cut off from other uses, conducive to public health and safety, (such as recreational or nutritional) are lost to the plutocracy, who will continue to screw the customers through centralised control, price-fixing, and all the other costly shenanigans one can predictably expect from these profiteers.
they have a history of lying to the public, and not only about safety.
they always cost w-a-y more than projected and are butt-ugly.
last but not least!
bechtel boondoggles=greed and evil passed on to unwitting generations, just so we can keep our bright shiny lie going a little longer, with ever-diminishing civil liberties.
and we have the nerve to castigate iran!
this nuclear option is the real koolaide, and if we don't show a better way to 'make' energy, then how do we expect the arab street to stop hating us for our hypocrisy, as we ramp up our nuclear industry, while fobidding them theirs.
i find it staggering (and deeply suspicious) that ecologists of note have taken this option to trumpet about.
it is so wrong-headed, it makes me despair that we are really on a 'ship of fools'
why is there no mention of (terrorism-free) conservation in plan 9's post, when intelligent approaches to that alone would probably halve our reckless consumption, starting with CAFE and moving right along sharpish to eco-building design, ans swiftly over to solar rooftops and greener fuels for home heating, be it methane, biodiesel, or coppiced woodland?
so many megawatts, so little time...
'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 3 27 comments
by eurogreen - Jun 28 24 comments
by gmoke - Jun 28
by Oui - Jul 5 11 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 27 1 comment
by Oui - Jun 25 12 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 16 10 comments
by Oui - Jun 17 70 comments
by Oui - Jul 74 comments
by Oui - Jul 7
by Oui - Jul 511 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 327 comments
by gmoke - Jun 29
by eurogreen - Jun 2824 comments
by gmoke - Jun 28
by Oui - Jun 2714 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 271 comment
by Oui - Jun 2512 comments
by Oui - Jun 1770 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 1610 comments
by Oui - Jun 158 comments
by Oui - Jun 1210 comments
by Oui - Jun 89 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 79 comments
by Oui - Jun 781 comments
by Oui - May 29164 comments
by Oui - May 22130 comments