The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
"In Islam, as elsewhere, women are doing it for themselves...cos the men aren't helping."
Did you study at the Sven school of sweeping generalizations ? I assume this isn't really meant to be serious. This is on a par with "Tony Blair ... stereotyping the Muslim community". There are, of course, plenty of men within Islam, as elsewhere, who are opposed to fundamentalism and who support the emancipation of women and they deserve recognition and support. Men also benefit from emancipation and education (which didn't do much for Mrs Thatcher), and it's likely that their children would too. Given that they also grew up in modern British society, many young Muslim men are likely to be quite different from their fathers.
In Britain there are organisations like Mpacuk. It tries to encourage Muslims to take an active role in politics and not to just follow their elders, e.g. in continuing to support Labour, even after Iraq. When a young Muslim woman wrote about how she refused to obey her father who wanted her to abandon her involvement with Mpacuk and focus on her studies, some guys told her to do what her father said. But some were very supportive:
Abdul: "Are you guys serious? Are both of you men by any chance? If you are then I feel sorry for your daughters who wish to help the Ummah.
Both of you should be ashamed of yourselves..."
Muhammed:
"...Instead of applauding this sister for her bravery and firm stance to continue to perservere for the Ummah for the sake of Allah SWT (Jihad - a FARD) despite what obstacles she may come across, 'Lab' & 'outlook' just shun her actions! Typical backward muslim men! Women like this fight to do Jihad whilst you guys hide behind your PC's mumbling and shunning those that put Allah's Jihad first. [Mpak is for peaceful struggle "jihad"]
Mali: "I think this girl father should be proud of his daughter, not stop her of doing good things, instead he should encourage her."
http://www.mpacuk.org/content/view/451/35/
These guys should be supported as well as the girl.
Frankly I don't think that to "peel off the hijab, put on make-up, and head down the pub to get pissed" represents progress, but rather surrender to the corporations which want us all to be passive consumers - preferably drunk much of the time. Otherwise we might actually start thinking and changing things ! Maybe it's because I'm a Londoner - that I moved to Nice.
You don't have to use ones which, quite illogically, condemn, not only Muslim men, but all men:
You continue: " seems to be making an attempt to dismiss my entire argument as invalid."
No, it's just rejecting your sweeping conclusion.
"Well actually, I do think there is an issue with religion being used as a bludgeon to justify wicked misogynistic practice. This time it's islam, but hang around, I'll have a go at a few others in time."
Of course there is an issue - but it doesn't entitle you to condemn all Muslim men, let alone men in general. The fact that you might attack others (I hope more logically) does not excuse your unwarranted generalisations, especially as conclusions. Maybe it's because I'm a Londoner - that I moved to Nice.
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 2 7 comments
by gmoke - Sep 27
by Oui - Oct 15
by Oui - Oct 14
by Oui - Oct 133 comments
by Oui - Oct 131 comment
by Oui - Oct 1210 comments
by Oui - Oct 121 comment
by Oui - Oct 118 comments
by Oui - Oct 11
by Oui - Oct 105 comments
by Oui - Oct 101 comment
by Oui - Oct 9
by Oui - Oct 91 comment
by Oui - Oct 81 comment
by Oui - Oct 8
by Oui - Oct 74 comments
by Oui - Oct 67 comments
by Oui - Oct 56 comments
by Oui - Oct 4
by Oui - Oct 42 comments