Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
So basically what we need is a slight adjustment in global regulations in order to make all shares tied to a minimum time of ownership - let's say 2 years ;-)

Shares would not be traded nor used as collateral during that time. The 2 year period would start from the purchase of the shares - to ensure an even volume on the market ;-)

Dividends would continue to be paid.

In one stroke we escape the quartal mentality, heavy liquidity, and bring some seriousness into investment.

It's a bit like owning a racehorse really. Or 'put your money where your mouth is and come back in 24 months'

You can't be me, I'm taken

by Sven Triloqvist on Sun Sep 10th, 2006 at 03:34:55 PM EST
Was Keynes referring to me?

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Sun Sep 10th, 2006 at 03:36:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The Tobin tax wouldn't be bad, either.

Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Sep 10th, 2006 at 03:41:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well I didn't want to mention that for fear J would call me a crackpot again....

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Sun Sep 10th, 2006 at 03:46:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The introduction  of a substantial overnment transfer tax on all transactions might prove the most serviceable reform available, with a view to mitigating the predominance of speculation over enterprise in the United States.
Tobin and Keynes agree.

Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Sep 10th, 2006 at 03:48:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Poor Tobin is a little discredited these days, but I still find merit in the idea that all financial transactions should be taxed at a fixed rate (which I have seen quoted as around 6%).

This would apply to all transactions, including right down to getting cash from an ATM.

This has to be set against having no other personal or corporate taxes on income. So it would be 6% flat.

The real benefit would be that a small footprint lifetsyle could lead you to feel great dignity.

You can't be me, I'm taken

by Sven Triloqvist on Sun Sep 10th, 2006 at 03:55:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]
6% !!!

I though the Tobin Tax was a minute amount, designed to slow down huge, frequent international finance transactions but to leave alone the individual investors.

Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Sep 10th, 2006 at 04:08:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]
You need the liquidity, otherwise people will just put their money in CDs (hoarding).

In Spain until at least a few years ago, there was no capital gains tax on shares which were kept for a sufficient number of years (maybe 10? 18?) I don't know whether that's still the case.

Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Sep 10th, 2006 at 03:46:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Now there's a decent compromise ;-)

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Sun Sep 10th, 2006 at 03:57:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Now I think we can get the music business behind this proposal...

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Sun Sep 10th, 2006 at 03:58:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Why is all comment text in italics?  Or I am I the only one to experience it <turns round suddenly in a paranoid kind of way>

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Sun Sep 10th, 2006 at 04:00:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Or I am I the only one to experience it

Yes

Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se

by A swedish kind of death on Sun Sep 10th, 2006 at 04:09:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Now it is back to normal with no intervention on my part - strange...

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Sun Sep 10th, 2006 at 05:51:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Don't know, me duck. Why, is this comment in italics too?
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Sun Sep 10th, 2006 at 04:13:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Now that's a bit sly o' yer, me duck

You can't be me, I'm taken
by Sven Triloqvist on Sun Sep 10th, 2006 at 05:52:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]
If you want to play with share definition, here are a few things that I would suggest:

  • right now when an individual buy shares indirectly (mutuals funds, retirement invested in stock, ...) two rights are transfered: the right to choose what stock to buy (let's say rightly so) and the right to vote at shareholder meetings. I would cancel this second right: your money manager does the stock picking, but you get to vote.

  • currently to get a dividend from a share, you just buy it at the right date five minute before closing and sell it the next day, you get the same dividend as someone who held the stock for a full quarter/year or more. I would link the dividend paid to a given to the time the holder hold on to the share.
by Laurent GUERBY on Sun Sep 10th, 2006 at 04:34:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Especially the first is extremely important. I'll put my thoughts on that together later.

Nothing is 'mere'. — Richard P. Feynman
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Sep 10th, 2006 at 04:38:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Thanks! Ping me if I don't react :)
by Laurent GUERBY on Mon Sep 11th, 2006 at 06:35:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
As for dividends the effect you are describing it is usually factored in to the price. So the day after the dividend is declared the price drops by an equivalent amount. If the dividend is only a few cents per share the effect may not be noticeable on a volatile stock.

Most bonds are traded so that interest is figured daily and the buyer has to pay the seller the proportionate amount of accrued interest which they get back along with the interest from the rest of the period at the next payment date.

Policies not Politics
---- Daily Landscape

by rdf (robert.feinman@gmail.com) on Sun Sep 10th, 2006 at 04:56:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The point was to encourage long term ownership. BTW I did an article in french on the  dividend ex date arbitrage
by Laurent GUERBY on Mon Sep 11th, 2006 at 02:53:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series