Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
I may agree with the analysis here but I have to note that all breaktrhough/disruptive technologies are less efficient than already mature ones.

You need dedicated "starry eyed" early adopters to make the economics work. And Maglev has significant potential advantages by the reduced friction especially if combined with wings in ground effect tunnels.

Orthodoxy is not a religion.

by BalkanIdentity (balkanid _ at _ google.com) on Tue Sep 26th, 2006 at 12:44:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
You need dedicated "starry eyed" early adopters to make the economics work.

But often even that is not enough. Some concepts just don't work economically. In that case, the starry-eyed waste money, often public money, which is really bad if it could have been spent on something else less impressive but still modern and sensible. A modern high-speed train, or a suburban train locomotive with the latest permanent-magnet synchronous motors under its hood, or a track-changing tramway, or a linear motor subway might cause less starry eyes, but they are no less modern and make much more sense.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 05:37:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]
And Maglev has significant potential advantages by the reduced friction

Actually, while mechanical friction is reduced, a larger magnetic friction takes its stead.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Wed Sep 27th, 2006 at 06:11:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series